城市与乡村

IT产业研发枢纽形成条件研究及其应用

展开
  • 1. 华东师范大学地理信息科学教育部重点实验室,上海 200062;
    2. 中国科学院科技政策与管理科学研究所,北京100080;
    3. 中国科技大学管理学院,合肥 230026
王铮(1954-),云南陆良人,研究员,博士生导师。

收稿日期: 2006-12-05

  修回日期: 2007-03-31

  网络出版日期: 2007-07-25

基金资助

国家自然科学基金资助项目(70673099)

Analysis on the condition of formation of ITindustrial R&D hub and its application

Expand
  • 1. Key Laboratory of Geographic Information Science, Ministry of Education of China,East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China;
    2. Institute of Politics and Management Science, CAS, Beijing 100080, China;
    3. School of Management, University of the Chinese Sciences and Technology, Hefei 230026, China

Received date: 2006-12-05

  Revised date: 2007-03-31

  Online published: 2007-07-25

Supported by

国家自然科学基金资助项目(70673099)

摘要

研发活动是创新过程中最重要的一个环节,能对技术创新产生重要影响。研发枢纽是研发组织与活动的聚集区域,其形成是20世纪90年代以来的发展趋势。研发枢纽不仅对位于其中的企业和组织十分重要,对区域经济的发展也能起到促进作用。本文分析了哪些因素对研发枢纽的形成具有重要意义。首先将影响研发枢纽建设的区域基础条件分为:资本基础和创新环境,进而将资本基础细分为产业基础、人力资本和社会资本;将创新环境细分为:基础设施、服务业发展状况和制度环境。在理论分析的基础上,从信息化设施水平、高技术产业区位商、人力和社会资本条件几个方面比较了京、沪研发枢纽建设的基础条件。结论认为,北京适合发展成混合型的研发枢纽,但在商贸人才培养、服务业建设方面还有许多工作要做。上海适合发展成为自主创新型的研发枢纽,但是需要进一步解决社会资本的问题。

关键词: 研发枢纽; IT产业; 中国

本文引用格式

王 铮, 杨 念, 何 琼, 姚梓璇 . IT产业研发枢纽形成条件研究及其应用[J]. 地理研究, 2007 , 26(4) : 651 -661 . DOI: 10.11821/yj2007040002

Abstract

R&D activities are the most important parts in the progress of innovation, and play a crucial role in the technological innovation. R&D hub, which is a cluster of R&D organizations, firstly appeared in the 1990's. It is not only important to the firms and organizations attached to it, but also may make great contributions to the development of regional economy. The basic conditions which are of great importance to the formation of R&D hubs are analyzed here. This paper classifies the regional conditions which will contribute to the formation of R&D hubs into two types: capital basis and innovative environment. Furthermore, capital basis is divided into industrial base, human capital and social capital; while innovation environment is divided into infrastructure, service sector and institutional circumstances. On the basis of theoretical analysis, the paper compares the basic conditions of Beijing with Shanghai. The indexes chosen include: level of informatization infrastructure, location quotient of high-tech industry, human capital condition and social capital condition. Finally, it comes to the following conclusions: Beijing, which has advantages in human capital, could grow into R&D hub of mixed form, however, it still needs to make great efforts to develop the service industry. Compared with Beijing, Shanghai is not only good at human capital, but also good at commercial elitists and culture. So Shanghai could develop into an innovative R&D hub.

Key words: R&D hub; IT industry; China

参考文献



[1] 方新,连燕华.迎接知识经济时代.重建国家创新系统,国际技术经济研究,1998,1(4):44~50.



[2] 刘燕华,李秀彬.国家创新系统研究中地理学的视角.地理研究,1998,17(3):225~228.



[3] 王铮,邓悦,等.理论经济地理学.北京:科学出版社,2002. 76~118.



[4] Gassmann, von Zedtwitz M.New concepts and trends in international R&D organization .Research Policy, 1999,28(2):231~250.



[5] Pearce R D, Decentralised R&D and strategic competitiveness:Globalised approaches to generation and use of technology in multinational enterprises (MNEs) . Research Policy, 1999, 28(2-3):157~178.



[6] Wonglimpiyarat J. What are the mechanisms driving the success of the US Silicon Valley?Technology Policy and Management, 2005,5(2):200~213.



[7] Audretsch D B, Lehmannb E E, Susanne Warning. University spillovers and new firm location. Research Policy,2005,34:1113~1122.



[8] Alcouffe A, Kuhn T.Schumpeterian endogenous growth theory and evolutionary economics. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 2004,14(2):223~236.



[9] 张方华,林仁方,陈劲.企业的社会资本与隐性知识.研究与发展管理,2003,15(6):67~72.



[10] Motohashi K.University-industry collaborations in Japan:The role of new technology-based firms in transforming the National Innovation System. Research Policy,2005,34(5):583~594.



[11] Feldman M P, Florida R.The geographic sources of innovation: Technological infrastructure and product innovation in the United States.Annals of the Association of American Geographers,1994,84(2):210~229.



[12] 刘筱,王铮,赵晶媛.政府在高技术产业集群中的作用:以深圳为例.科研管理,2006,24(4):36~43.



[13] Eswaran M, Kotwal A.The role of the service sector in the process of industrialization.Journal of Development Economics,2002,68:401~420.



[14] 陈德宁,沈玉芳.研究与开发全球化对广州科技创新影响初探.广东商学院学报,2004,(3):78~82.



[15] 刘伟,盖文启.从区域创新环境视角看北京市高新技术产业的竞争力.北京社会科学,2003,(3):12.



[16] 王建华.跨国公司海外研发投资的内在动因与区位选择.中国科技论坛,2004, (4):136~139.



[17] Cohen W A, Goto A, Nagata R. Nelson, et al.R&D Spillovers, Patents and the Incentives to Innovate in Japan and the United States.working paper. 2001.



[18] 张文忠,李业锦.区域创新环境与企业发展研究.软科学,2003,17(6):25~28.



[19] 滕丽,王铮,庞丽,李刚强.信息化对区域经济的影响.人文地理,2006,21(1):72~75.



[20] Moineddin R, Beyene J.On the location quotient confidence interval.Geographical Analysis,2003,35(3):2~2.



[21] Jeong B.Measurement of human capital input across countries: A method based on the laborer’s income. Journal of Development Economics,2002,67:333~349.



[22] 吴兵,王铮.中国各省区人力资本测算研究.科研管理,2004,25(4):60~65.



[23] 曾路. 跨国公司在华研发与我国的科技进步——兼对京、沪、粤三地比较研究.科技管理研究,2004,24(6):10~15.
文章导航

/