地表过程研究

喀斯特石漠化小流域景观的空间因子分析——以贵州清镇王家寨小流域为例

展开
  • 1. 中国科学院地球化学研究所环境地球化学国家重点实验室,贵阳 550002;
    2. 中国科学院研究生院,北京 100049;
    3. 贵州师范大学地理与生命科学学院,贵阳 550001;
    4. 中国科学院遥感应用研究所遥感科学国家重点实验室,北京 100101
周梦维(1982-), 女, 湖北监利人, 博士研究生。从事岩溶环境和地理信息系统研究。

收稿日期: 2006-09-07

  修回日期: 2007-03-27

  网络出版日期: 2007-09-25

基金资助

国家重点基础研究发展计划项目(2006CB403201)、中科院科技支黔工程项目、中科院知识创新前沿领域项目和贵州省最高科学成就奖科技匹配项目联合资助。

Spatial factor analysis of karst rocky desertification landscape patterns in Wangjiazhai catchment, Guizhou

Expand
  • 1. State Key Laboratory of Environmental Geochemistry, Institute of Geochemistry, CAS, Guiyang 550002, China;
    2. Graduate University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
    3. Department of Resource and Environmental Science, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang 550002, China;
    4. State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science,Institute of Remote Sensing Applications,CAS,Beijing 100101, China

Received date: 2006-09-07

  Revised date: 2007-03-27

  Online published: 2007-09-25

Supported by

国家重点基础研究发展计划项目(2006CB403201)、中科院科技支黔工程项目、中科院知识创新前沿领域项目和贵州省最高科学成就奖科技匹配项目联合资助。

摘要

以贵州喀斯特地区的王家寨小流域为研究对象,基于多源信息,依托RS和GIS技术获取2005年该流域石漠化景观格局信息,以此为基础进行石漠化景观分布指数、石漠化综合指数、 -s平面分析模型以及三次曲线拟合等分析,旨在从小流域尺度上探讨石漠化景观在坡度、坡向、高程和与村庄距离等空间因子上的分布规律。结果表明:潜在、轻度石漠化景观受坡度影响最显著;其他类型石漠化景观受坡向影响最明显。石漠化程度先随坡度的增大而加重,27°后呈缓解趋势;各坡向中南、东南坡石漠化最严重;随高程增加石漠化加剧;距村庄越远石漠化越严重。初步推断各空间因子对石漠化程度的影响由强至弱的顺序为:坡度、坡向、高程、与村庄的距离。

本文引用格式

周梦维, 王世杰, 李阳兵 . 喀斯特石漠化小流域景观的空间因子分析——以贵州清镇王家寨小流域为例[J]. 地理研究, 2007 , 26(5) : 897 -906 . DOI: 10.11821/yj2007050005

Abstract

The impact of spatial factors on karst rocky desertification landscape was studied in Wangjiazhai catchment.Based on the image of SPOT5 in 2005, with the support of the geographic information system (GIS) and remote sensing (RS) software, karst rocky desertification landscape patterns in the studied area was classified as: no, latent, slight, moderate, strong, and extremely strong karst rocky desertification types. Meanwhile, four spatial factors (slope, slope aspect, elevation and distance to the village) were derived from the digital elevation model. Quasi-quantitative analysis was made on the relationships between the above four factors with karst rocky desertification landscape distribution index (RLDI) and karst rocky desertification comprehensive index (RCI), respectively. Results indicate that: (1)The distribution of various rocky desertification landscapes along the spatial gradient is different. For example, the latent and slight rocky desertification is affected by slope aspect more greatly than that on other spatial factors; while the moderate, strong and extremely strong rocky desertification is highly correlated with the slope gradient. (2)The four spatial factors affect rocky desertification in different ways. For example, 27° is a critical angle for rocky desertification intensity which becomes severer firstly, and then becomes slighter around the turning point. As to the effects of slope aspect, due to the aspect of terrane and exogenic forces including solar radiation and precipitation, the severest rocky desertification occurs in regions of south or southeast slope aspect; and less for north, northeast and east cases, while it is slight in other cases. Moreover, with the increase of elevation, the intensity of rocky desertification is in a deteriorative trend. The regulation of rocky desertification along the distance to the village reveals the mode of human activities on rocky desertification process. (3) The fittings between RCI values and four factors, using the cubic curve estimation method, are obviously different in the descending order: slope>slope aspects>elevation>the distance to the village. The order, in a sense, shows the intensities of those spatial factors on RCI values. Though influences of each spatial factor on RCI could be evaluated by using single-factor correlation analysis, it also should notice that those factors affected RCI mutually.

参考文献



[1] Wang S J, Li R L, Sun C X, et al. How types of carbonate rock assemblages constrain the distribution of karst rocky desertified land in Guizhou province, China: Phenomena and mechanisms. Land Degradation & Development, 2004,15,123~131.



[2] 李瑞玲,王世杰.喀斯特石漠化评价指标体系探讨.热带地理,2004,24(12):145~149.



[3] 王德炉,朱守谦,黄宝龙.贵州喀斯特石漠化类型及程度评价.生态学报,2005,25(5):1057~1063.



[4] 王世杰,李阳兵.生态建设中的喀斯特石漠化分级问题.中国岩溶,2005,24(3):192~195.



[5] 王世杰.喀斯特石漠化——中国西南最严重的生态地质环境问题.矿物岩石化学通报,2003,22(2):120~126.



[6] 白晓永,熊康宁,苏孝良.喀斯特石漠化景观及其土地生态效应——以贵州贞丰县为例.中国岩溶,2005,24(4):276~281.



[7] Wang S J, Zhang D F, Li R L, Mechanism of rocky desertification in the Karst Mountain Areas of Guizhou, Southwest China. International Review For Environmental Strategies, 2002, 3(1):123~135.



[8] 张竹如,李燕,王林均.贵州岩溶石漠化地区生态环境恢复的初步研究——贵阳黔灵山的启示.中国岩溶,2001,20(4):310~314.



[9] 龙健,邓启琼,江新荣.贵州喀斯特石漠化地区土地利用方式对土壤质量恢复能力的影响.生态学报,2005,25(12):3188~3195.



[10] Wang S J, Liu Q M, Zhang D F.Karst rocky desertification in southwestern China: geomorphology, landuse, impact and rehabilitation. Land Degradation & Development, 2004, 15:115~121.



[11] 李勉,李占斌,刘普灵. 中国土壤侵蚀定量研究进展. 水土保持研究, 2002, 9(3):243~248.



[12] 喻红,曾辉,江子瀛.快速城市化地区景观组分在地形梯度上的分布特征研究.地理科学,2001,21(1):64~69.



[13] 张增祥,赵晓丽,陈晓峰. 基于遥感和地理信息系统(GIS)的山区土壤侵蚀强度数值分析.农业工程学报,1998,14(3): 77~83.



[14] 李阳兵,王世杰,容丽.不同石漠化程度岩溶峰丛洼地系统景观格局的比较.地理研究,2005,24(3):371~378.



[15] 吴秀芹,蔡运龙,蒙吉军. 喀斯特山区土壤侵蚀与土地利用关系研究——以贵州省关岭县石板桥流域为例.水土保持研究, 2002, 12(4): 46~48; 77.



[16] Huang L J.Rainfall and aspect-related differences in Erosion Intensity. Geographical Research on the Topical and Sub-tropical Area of South China. Beijing: Science Press, 1990.



[17] 《贵州省农业地貌区划》编写组.贵州省农业地貌区划.贵阳:人民出版社,1989.23~48.
文章导航

/