SWAT在干旱半干旱地区的应用——以窟野河流域为例
收稿日期: 2008-02-28
修回日期: 2008-07-27
网络出版日期: 2010-11-20
基金资助
国家自然科学基金 (50579003)和"十一五"国家科技支撑计划资助项目 (2006BAB06B01-09-01)。
SWAT application in arid and semi-arid region: A case study in the Kuye River Basin
Received date: 2008-02-28
Revised date: 2008-07-27
Online published: 2010-11-20
Supported by
国家自然科学基金 (50579003)和"十一五"国家科技支撑计划资助项目 (2006BAB06B01-09-01)。
SWAT是一个基于物理机制的分布式流域水文模型,其产流机制中对于地表径流、壤中流、浅层地下径流和深层地下径流的模拟方法比较实用,能够适用于不同气候条件和下垫面条件下的产汇流情况。本文将SWAT应用到黄河中游干旱半干旱区多沙粗沙典型流域之一窟野河流域,模拟了1980~1985年的日流量和月平均流量过程,分析并探讨了SWAT产流机制对水源划分和径流形成过程的影响。结果表明,水量平衡相对误差在10%~20%左右,但Nash-Sutticliffe效率系数都较低。本文对模拟结果进行了初步分析,认为SWAT产流机制不能有效模拟干旱半干旱地区的窟野河流域的壤中流、基流和春汛流量过程,并探讨了SWAT在干旱半干旱地区产流模拟可能存在的问题和值得深入研究的方向。
程 磊, 徐宗学, 罗 睿, 米艳娇 . SWAT在干旱半干旱地区的应用——以窟野河流域为例[J]. 地理研究, 2009 , 28(1) : 65 -73 . DOI: 10.11821/yj2009010009
The SWAT is a physically-based distributed hydrological model. Its runoff generation mechanism is more practical. The methods adopted in the process of runoff including surface runoff, interflow and groundwater flow are applicable to various conditions of climate and underlying surface. In this study, the SWAT (Version 2005) is applied to the Kuye River basin, one of typical watersheds with plentiful and coarse sand in the middle reaches of the Yellow River with arid and semi-arid climate. When the model in the Kuye River basin was developed, automatic calibration method within the SWAT Version 2005 was used to calibrate the model. According to the stream flow hydrograph at Wenjiachuan station, the mouth of the river, the parameters were further adjusted. Then, daily and monthly discharges from 1980 to 1985 have been simulated in the study area, and observed data series of three hydrological stations (Wenjiachuan, Xinmiao and Wangdaohengta) are used to evaluate the simulated discharge series of SWAT. The effects of physical mechanism for streamflow generation processes have been analyzed and discussed. The result shows that the relative error of water budget is about 10%-20%, while the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency coefficient (Ens) is relatively low, with Ens of daily series being about 0.2 and monthly Ens around 0.6. Preliminary analysis of simulation results showed that the SWAT is not effective to simulate the discharge of interflow, baseflow and spring flood in the Kuye River basin. In addition, it is proposed that the SWAT runoff generation mechanism in arid and semi-arid regions need to be further investigated.
Key words： SWAT; runoff generation; Kuye River; arid and semi-arid region
[1] 刘昌明, 陈志恺. 中国水资源现状评价和供需发展趋势分析. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社, 2001.
[2] 张建云, 王国庆,等. 气候变化对水文水资源影响研究. 北京: 科技出版社,2007. 68~70.
[3] 张光辉. 全球气候变化对黄河流域天然径流量影响的情景分析. 地理研究,2006, 25(2): 268~275.
[4] 冉圣宏, 李秀彬, 吕昌河. 鱼子溪流域水文过程影响因素的特征时间尺度分析. 地理研究,2007, 26(2): 337~345.
[5] Neitsch, S L, Arnold, J G, Kiniry, J R, et al. Soil and water assessment tool user's manual. Temple: Grassland, Soil and Water Research Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, 2002. 1~3.
[6] Neitsch S L, Arnold J G, Kiniry J R, et al. Soil and water assessment tool theoretical documentation: Version 2005. http://www.brc.tamus.edu/swat/
[7] Eckhardt K, Haverkamp S, Fohrer, N, et al. SWAT-G, a version of SWAT99.2 modified for application to low mountain range catchments. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 2002, 27 (9-10):641~644.
[8] Jayakrishnan R, Srinivasan R, Santhi C, et al. Advances in the application of the SWAT model for water resources management. Hydrological Processes, 2005, 19 (3):749 ~ 762.
[9] Arnold J G, Williams J R, Srinivasan R, et al. Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment part I: Model development. Journal of the American Water Resources Association. 1998, 34(1):73~89.
[10] Santhi C, Arnold J G, Williams J R, et al. Validation of the SWAT model on a large river basin with point and nonpoint sources. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 2001, 37(5):1169~1188.
[11] Chanasyk D S, Mapfumo E, Willms W. Quantification and simulation of surface runoff from fescue grassland watersheds. Agricutural Water Management, 2003, 59:137~153.
[12] Tripathi, M P, Panda , R K, Raghuwanshi, N S. Identification and prioritisation of critical sub-watersheds for soil conservation management using the SWAT Model. Biosystems Engineering, 2003, 85 (3): 365~379.
[13] F Bouraoui, S Benabadallah, A Jrad, et al. Application of the SWAT model on the Medjerda river basin (Tunisia). Physics and Chemistry of Earth,2005, 30:497~507.
[14] 庞靖鹏, 徐宗学, 刘昌明. SWAT模型研究应用进展. 水土保持研究, 2007, 14(3): 31~35.
[15] 黄清华, 张万昌. SWAT分布式水文模型在黑河干流山区流域的改进及应用. 南京林业大学学报,2004,28(2).22~26.
[16] 王中根, 刘昌明,黄友波.SWAT模型的原理、结构及应用研究.地理科学进展, 2003,22(1):79~86.
[17] 刘昌明,李道峰,田英.基于DEM的分布式水文模型在大尺度流域应用研究.地理科学进展,2003,22(5):437~445.
[18] Zhao F F, Xu Z X, Huang J X.Impact of climate change on the streamflow in headwater of the Yellow River basin. In: Liu Zhiyu, Yang Dawen. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Flood Forecasting and Water Resources Assessment for IAHS-PUB. Beijing: China WaterPower Press, 2006.471~481.
[19] 张东, 张万昌, 朱利,等. SWAT分布式流域水文物理模型的改进及应用研究. 地理科学,2005, 25(4):434~440.
[20] 朱新军, 王中根, 李建新, 于磊, 王金贵. SWAT模型在漳卫河流域应用研究. 地理科学进展, 2006, 25(5): 105~111.
[21] 郝芳华, 孙峰, 张建永.官厅水库流域非点源污染研究进展.地学前缘,2002,9(2):385~386.
[22] Hao F H, Zhang X S, Yang Z F. A distributed non-point source pollution model: Calibration and validation in the Yellow River Basin. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2004,16(4):646~650.
[23] 庞靖鹏. 非点源污染分布式模拟——以密云水库水源地保护为例. 北京:北京师范大学水科学研究院,2007.
[24] 陈军锋,李秀彬,张明.模型模拟梭磨河流域气候波动和土地覆被变化对流域水文的影响.中国科学D辑, 2004,34(7):668~674.
[25] 刘吉峰,霍世青,李世杰,等.SWAT模型在青海湖布哈河流域径流变化成因分析中的应用.河海大学学报(自然科学版),2007,35(2): 159~163.
[26] 杨轶文, 杨青惠. 窟野河流域水文特性分析. 水资源与水工程学报,2006,17(1):56~60.
[27] 郝芳华,等. 非点源污染模型:理论方法与应用. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社,2006.67.
[28] 魏文秋, 谢淑琴. 遥感资料在SCS模型产流计算中的应用. 环境遥感,1992,7(4): 243~250.
[29] 张秀英, 孟飞, 丁宁. SCS模型在干旱半干旱区小流域径流估算中的应用. 水土保持研究, 2003, 10(4): 171~173.
[30] 刘贤赵, 康绍忠, 刘德林,等. 基于地理信息的SCS模型及其在黄土高原小流域降雨-径流关系中的应用. 农业工程学报, 2005, 21(5): 93~97.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |