基于可达性角度的公共产品空间公平性的定量评价方法 ——以江苏省仪征市为例
收稿日期: 2008-03-10
修回日期: 2008-08-21
网络出版日期: 2010-11-20
基金资助
国家自然科学基金资助项目(70573053、40771075)
Assessment of fair space of public product basedon accessibility:A case of Yizheng city
Received date: 2008-03-10
Revised date: 2008-08-21
Online published: 2010-11-20
Supported by
国家自然科学基金资助项目(70573053、40771075)
林 康, 陆玉麒, 刘 俊, 张 莉, 王亭娜 . 基于可达性角度的公共产品空间公平性的定量评价方法 ——以江苏省仪征市为例[J]. 地理研究, 2009 , 28(1) : 215 -225 . DOI: 10.11821/yj2009010023
Along with the rapid development of socioeconomy and the great improvement of people's standard of living, to provide high quality public service and build a harmonious society is a primary task of the government. Fair space is the key principle of public service. It involves spacial accessibility and spacial attainability, and the former is the foundation and precondition. In this paper, based on the public product layout decision support system, we take an example of the hospitals in Yizheng city, analyze the spacial effect of different distribution of them from the aspect of accessibility, and provide powerful support for optimizing the supply of public product. And moreover, it gives a good sample of quantitative analysis on the public product layout. Through the case study of Yizheng city, we think there are two basic indices to measure the fair space of public product. The first is quantity index. For Yizheng city, we choose the accessibility of half an hour as quantitative target to optimize the public product layout. The second is quality index. We choose accessibility's distributing frequency and cumulative frequency of five minutes' interval as quality standard. In other words, for the same accessibility of half an hour but different distribution, it means different fair space. Therefore, it is a further study on the conception and methodology of fair space.
Key words： public product; spacial accessibility; fair space; Yizheng city
[1] 迟福林.公共需求变化与政府转型.新华文摘,2005,18:124~127.
[2] 约瑟夫·E·斯蒂格利茨(美).经济学.姚开建,等译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,1997.344~355.
[3] 段一.公共产品的边界.当代财经,2003,(11):78~82.
[4] 乔治·恩德勒(美).面向行动的经济伦理学.高国希,吴新文,等译.上海:上海社会科学院出版社,2002.212~216.
[5] 中共中央党校课题组.唯物史观新视野.北京:东方出版社,1999.223~245.
[6] 曹颖.论公共产品的本质—兼论公共产品理论的局限性.经济学家,2006,(3):45~49.
[7] 埃莉诺·奥斯特罗姆(美).公共事务的治理之道.余逊达,陈旭 译.上海:三联书店,2000.121~132.
[8] 吴玉宗.服务型政府:缘起和前景.社会科学研究,2004,(3):12~16.
[9] 高兴武.论服务型政府公共产品的供给.广西民族学院学报,2006,28(2): 121~124.
[10] 马林兵,曹小曙.一种启发式A*算法和网格划分的空间可达性计算方法.地理研究, 2008,27(1):93~99.
[11] 卢现祥.西方新制度经济学.北京:中国发展出版社,1996.78~82.
[12] 安东尼·吉登斯(英).第三条道路:社会民主主义的复兴.郑戈 译.北京:北京大学出版社,2000.135~142.
[13] 林伟鹏,闫整.医疗卫生体系改革与城市医疗卫生设施规划.城市规划,2006,30(4):77~85.
[14] 曾国安.试论政府供应公共物品的范围.武汉经济管理干部学院学报,2000,14(2):27~30.
[15] 汪明峰,宁越敏.城市的网络优势—中国互联网骨干网络结构与节点可达性分析.地理研究,2006,25(2):193~203.
[16] 吴威,曹有挥,等.开放条件下长江三角区域的综合交通可达性空间格局.地理研究, 2007,26(2):391~402.
[17] Geurs K T, Ritsema J R.Accessibility measures: Review and applications.Bilthoven: Rijksinstituut Voor Volksgezondheid En Milieu(RIVW) , 2001.136~144.
[18] Robinson G M. Conflict and Change in the Countryside. London: Belhaven Press,1990.423~466.
[19] Pacione M. Access to urban services: The case of secondary schools in Glasgow. Geographical Magazine, 1989,105(1):12~18.
[20] Emily Talen. Visualizing fairness: Equity maps for planners. Journal of the American Planning Association, 1998, 64: 22~38.
[21] Emily Talen. Neighborhoods as service providers: A methodology for evaluating pedestrian access. Environment and planning B: Planning and Design, 2003,30:181~200.
[22] Handy S L, Niemeier D A. Measuring accessibility: An exploration of issues and alternatives. Environment and Planning A, 1997, 29: 1175~1194.
[23] Lucy W. Equity and planning for local service. Journal of the American Planning Assciation, 1981,47: 447~457.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |