基于环境质量的中国城市规模探讨
收稿日期: 2008-09-03
修回日期: 2009-01-09
网络出版日期: 2009-05-25
基金资助
湛江师范学院博士专项研究项目:基于可持续城市化的城市规模——中国的实证研究。
A study of China's city scale based on the environment quality
Received date: 2008-09-03
Revised date: 2009-01-09
Online published: 2009-05-25
Supported by
湛江师范学院博士专项研究项目:基于可持续城市化的城市规模——中国的实证研究。
许抄军 . 基于环境质量的中国城市规模探讨[J]. 地理研究, 2009 , 28(3) : 792 -802 . DOI: 10.11821/yj2009030023
Pursuing an ideal urban living environment of mankind is the common goal of human beings. On the one hand, the urban aggregation effect not only leads to an expansion of the city scale, but also causes a concentration of various production and life pollutants, and urban environment quality deterioration. What city size is suitable for the improvement of environment quality, is a question needed to be discussed deeply. Through constructing a theoretical model of urban scale-environment quality, this paper analyzes the panel data of China during 1997~2006 based on the variable-intercept model. The results are shown as follows: the empirical model of city scale-environment quality in China presents a positive N-shaped curve, the corresponding city scales of the two turning points of the curve are 2.6 and 9.3 million. According to the empirical model, the optimal city scale is 2.6 million, and the reasonable city scale is between 2~3.5 million. Apart from some provincial capital cities and all of the cities at prefecture level and above, the majority of the cities in China are in a rising stage of environment quality, and the expanding of city scale is favorable to the sustainable utilization of urban environment. In order to alleviate the constraint of urban environment to sustainable development, environment-friendly development in the process of urbanization is called for by the severe situation in current China. From the empirical model, the result indicates that the city scale-environment quality in China did not show an inverted N-shaped curve concluded by the theoretical model. On the one hand, it is revealed that the specificity of China's urbanization, on the other hand, there is still certain limitation in the theoretical model. So the improvement of the theoretical model needs further support by more empirical research.
Key words: environment quality; optimal city scale; reasonable city scale; China
[1] 刘玲玲,周天勇.对城市规模理论的再认识.经济经纬,2006,(1):112~115.
[2] 王西琴,李芬.天津市经济增长与环境污染水平关系.地理研究,2005,24(6):834~842.
[3] 吴玉萍,董锁成,宋键峰.北京市经济增长与环境污染水平计量模型研究.地理研究,2002,21(2):239~246.
[4] 祁新华,程煜,陈烈,朱宇.大城市边缘区人居环境系统演变规律——以广州市为例.地理研究,2008,27(2):421~430.
[5] Yang X.Development, structural changes and urbanization. Journal of Development Economics, 1990,34:199~222.
[6] Zheng XiaoPing.Measure optimal population distribution by agglomeration economies and diseconomies: A case study of Tokyo.Urban Studies,1998,35:95~112.
[7] Capello Roberta, Camagni Roberto.Beyond optimal city size:An evaluation of alternative urban growth patterns.Urban Studies,2000,9:1479~1496.
[8] 姚士谋,朱振国,Kamking.城市规模不能盲目求大.中国土地,2001,(3):27~29.
[9] 张洋.对城市规模的再认识——兼论西部地区的城市化道路.软科学,2001,15(3):71~74.
[10] 王小鲁,夏小林.优化城市规模推动经济增长.经济研究,1999,(9):22~29.
[11] 陈伟民,蒋华园.城市规模效益及其发展政策.财经科学,2000,(4):67~70.
[12] 俞勇军,陆玉麒.城市适度空间规模的成本——收益分析模型探讨.地理研究,2005,24(5):795~802.
[13] 饶会林,丛屹.再谈城市规模效益问题.财经问题研究,1999,(10):56~58.
[14] 俞燕山.我国城镇的合理规模及其效率研究.经济地理,2000,20,(2):84~89.
[15] 郑亚平.基于我国城市合理规模的理论与实证研究.求索,2006,(9):81~82.
[16] 李培.最优城市规模研究述评.经济评论,2007,(1):131~135.
[17] 许抄军,罗能生,吕渭济.基于资源消耗的中国城市规模研究.经济学家,2008,(4):56~64.
[18] 许学强,周一星,宁越敏.城市地理学.北京:高等教育出版社,1997.143~144.
[19] 高铁梅.计量经济学分析方法与建模.北京:清华大学出版社,2006.305~306.
[20] 宁传华主编.SPSS与统计分析.北京:电子工业出版社,2007.493.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |