土地利用变化的地形梯度特征与空间扩展——以北京市海淀区和延庆县为例
收稿日期: 2008-01-15
修回日期: 2008-02-17
网络出版日期: 2008-11-25
基金资助
国家自然科学基金项目资助(40621061,30570319)
Land use change characteristics along the terrain gradient and the spatial expanding analysis: A case study of Haidian District and Yanqing County, Beijing
Received date: 2008-01-15
Revised date: 2008-02-17
Online published: 2008-11-25
Supported by
国家自然科学基金项目资助(40621061,30570319)
选择北京市海淀区、延庆县作为研究区,利用1992年、2002年遥感影像数据,借用地形位梯度指数,研究了土地利用变化的地形梯度特征及其空间扩展形势。研究表明:(1)海淀区建设用地受到经济和社会发展驱动明显,表现出既向低地形梯度位也向高地形梯度位扩展;但农业用地、果园因建设用地扩展受到挤压,表现为向更高地形位扩展态势;林地在高地形位得到了明显恢复,也有向更低的地形位扩张的趋势,但灌草地和未利用地在中高地形位受到林地挤压,低地形位受到农业用地、果园挤压,优势地形位明显萎缩;(2)延庆县建设用地扩展受地形位驱动作用明显,主要集中在低地形位区域;农业用地主要分布在较低地形位上,变化不大;果园在经济发展需求驱动下,向更高地形位扩展;林地在较高地形位得到较好恢复,对灌草地、未利用地产生了挤压作用,使得灌草地、未利用地在中高地形位的优势度降低,优势分布区间趋于萎缩。
陈利顶, 杨 爽, 冯晓明 . 土地利用变化的地形梯度特征与空间扩展——以北京市海淀区和延庆县为例[J]. 地理研究, 2008 , 27(6) : 1225 -1235 . DOI: 10.11821/yj2008060001
Studying land use change and its spatial expansion along the terrain gradient is of great significance for identifying the direction of land use change and its sustainable use. In this paper, a case study was conducted in Haidian District and Yanqing County of Beijing by comparing land use pattern in 1992, and 2002 with regard to terrain niche index using remote sensing image interpretation. It was found that: (1) A clear difference exists in land use change between Haidian District and Yanqing County. In Haidian District, the built-up area expands to both higher and lower terrain niche areas with economic development and population growth. Farmland and orchard are extruded to the higher terrain niche area due to urban expansion. Woodland in high terrain niche area is well restored, and further expands to the lower terrain niche area. The unused land, grassland and shrubberies are remarkably constricted in the middle and high terrain niche areas with the intrusion of woodland, and reduced in the low terrain niche sections due to farmland increase. In Yanqing County, the built-up area is obviously confined by the terrain niche and is mainly located in the low terrain niche area as well as the farmland. Orchard, however, is shifted to the higher terrain niche area with the economic development. Woodland is well restored in the higher terrain niche area, and the predominant distribution of the unused land, grassland and shrubberies is reduced. (2) A common point was found in both Haidian District and Yanqing County. Ecological conservation was well carried out in the both areas in recent decade, and consequently natural vegetation was restored appropriately. A difference in land use change is that land use in Haidian District is more affected by the economic development than that in Yanqing County. The built-up area spreads out faster in Haidian District, and farmland was extruded to higher terrain niche area under the pressure of urban expansion in Haidian District, while they are both constricted in the low terrain niche area in Yanqing County.
Key words： land use change; terrain gradient; terrain niche index; Beijing
[1] Eickhout B, Van Meijl H, Tabeau A, et al. Economic and ecological consequences of four European land use scenarios. Land Use Policy, 2007, 24: 562~575.
[2] Parker D C, Manson S M, Janssen M A, et al. Multi-agent systems for the simulation of land-use and land-cover change: A review. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 2003, 93 (2), 314~337.
[3] Zhang K, Yu Z, Li X, et al. Land use change and land degradation in China from 1991 to 2001. Land Degradation and Development, 2007, 18: 209~219.
[4] 摆万奇,赵土洞. 土地利用变化驱动力系统分析.资源科学, 2001, 23 (3): 39~41.
[5] 李秀彬. 全球环境变化的核心领域——土地利用/覆被变化的国际研究动向. 地理学报, 1996, 51(6): 553~557.
[6] Mottet A,Ladet S, Coque' N, et al. Agricultural land-use change and its drivers in mountain landscapes: A case study in the Pyrenees. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment,2006,114 (2):296~310.
[7] Matthews R B, Gilbert N G, Roach A, et al. Agent-based land-use models: A review of applications. Landscape Ecology, 2007, 22: 1447~1459.
[8] Wang X, Zheng D, Shen Y. Land use change and its driving forces on the Tibetan Plateau during 1990 2000. Catena, 2008, 72: 56~66.
[9] Wu Q, Li H Q, Wang R S, et al. Monitoring and predicting land use change in Beijing using remote sensing and GIS. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2006,78: 322~333.
[10] 史培军,陈晋,潘耀忠. 深圳市土地利用变化机制分析. 地理学报, 2000, 55 (2): 151~160.
[11] 朱会义,何书金,张明. 环渤海地区土地利用变化的驱动力分析. 地理研究, 2001, 20 (6): 669~678.
[12] 何书金,王秀红,邓祥征,等. 中国西部典型地区土地利用变化对比分析. 地理研究, 2006, 25(1): 79~87.
[13] Rounsevell M D A, Annetts J E, Audsley E, et al. Modelling the spatial distribution of agricultural land use at the regional scale. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2003, 95: 465~479.
[14] 姜广辉,张凤荣,孔祥斌,等. 北京山区建设用地扩展空间分异分析. 地理研究,2006,25(5):905~912.
[15] 王双,何春阳,潘耀忠,等. 水资源约束下北京地区2004~2020年土地利用变化情景模拟研究. 自然资源学报, 2006, 21(4): 535~544.
[16] Metzger M J, Rounsevell M D A, Acosta-Michlik L, et al. The vulnerability of ecosystem services to land use change. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2006, 114: 69~85.
[17] Shi P J, Yuan Y, Zheng J, et al.The effect of land use/cover change on surface runoff in Shenzhen region, China. Catena, 2007, 69:31~35.
[18] Kong F H, Nakagoshi N. Spatial-temporal gradient analysis of urban green spaces in Jinan, China. Landscape and Urban Planning,2006,78(1): 147~164.
[19] Zhao B, Kreuter U, Li B, et al. An ecosystem service value assessment of land-use change on Chongming Island, China. Land Use Policy, 2004, 21:139~148.
[20] 于伯华,吕昌河. 北京市顺义区土地资源竞争与土地利用变化分析. 农业工程学报, 2006, 22(10): 94~97.
[21] 岳书平,张树文,闫业. 东北样带土地利用变化对生态服务价值的影响. 地理学报, 2007, 62(8): 879~886.
[22] 喻红,曾辉,江子瀛. 快速城市化地区景观组分在地形梯度上的分布特征研究. 地理科学, 2001, 21(1): 64~69.
[23] 李书娟,曾辉. 快速城市化地区建设用地沿城市化梯度的扩张特征——以南昌地区为例. 生态学报, 2004, 24 (1): 55~62.
[24] 杨存建,张果,陈军,等. 基于遥感的成都市及其周边城镇的扩展. 地理研究,2008,27(1):100~108.
[25] Weng Y C. Spatiotemporal changes of landscape pattern in response to urbanization. Landscape and Urban Planning,2007, 81(2): 341~353.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |