不同电子受体及盐分输入对河口湿地土壤甲烷产生潜力的影响
收稿日期: 2008-05-09
修回日期: 2008-08-22
网络出版日期: 2008-11-25
基金资助
国家自然科学基金资助项目(40671174); 福建省自然科学基金资助项目(2006J0128);福建省自然地理学重点学科项目资助
Effects of different exogenous electron acceptors and salt import on methane production potential of estuarine marsh soil
Received date: 2008-05-09
Revised date: 2008-08-22
Online published: 2008-11-25
Supported by
国家自然科学基金资助项目(40671174); 福建省自然科学基金资助项目(2006J0128);福建省自然地理学重点学科项目资助
对闽江河口芦苇(Phragmites australis)湿地土壤甲烷产生潜力及电子受体(硝酸盐,三价铁和硫酸盐)及盐分(氯化钠)输入对其的影响进行了厌氧培养实验及测定。结果表明,芦苇湿地土壤甲烷产生潜力范围是0.0202~0.0871 μg · g-1 · d-1,0~10 cm土壤甲烷产生潜力最大;电子受体及盐分的输入对土壤甲烷产生潜力具有抑制作用,3种电子受体对甲烷产生潜力抑制程度从大到小为硝酸盐>三价铁>硫酸盐,不同浓度硝酸盐与三价铁添加后甲烷产生潜力与对照土壤差异显著(P<0.05),而硫酸盐与盐分的添加抑制作用不显著,对于每一种电子受体及盐分其不同浓度处理对甲烷产生潜力的影响差异也不明显(P>0.05)。
曾从盛, 王维奇, 仝 川 . 不同电子受体及盐分输入对河口湿地土壤甲烷产生潜力的影响[J]. 地理研究, 2008 , 27(6) : 1321 -1330 . DOI: 10.11821/yj2008060011
Methane is an important greenhouse gas with high warming potential, most of methane emit from various wetlands. Some studies on methane emission in wetlands were done, however, few studies were reported in China, especially on tidal marsh. Production of methane is the basis of methane emission, and is also the first step of methane emission influencing greatly the emission process.Hence, research on the fields is necessary. The Minjiang River Estuary wetland was one of the tidal wetlands, which is situated on the southeast seashore of China influenced by tide,the concentrations of soil water content, salinity and electron acceptors were changed, and the effects of variation of soil physiochemical properties on methane production were unknown. Phragmites australis was one of the main species in Minjiang River Estuary wetland, distributed on the intertidal belt, so our study took Phragmites australis marsh which is typical and representative as the study areas. The methane production potential from the Phragmites australis marsh soil of the Minjing River Estuary after the import of electron acceptors and salt was determined using an anaerobic incubation technique. The range of methane production potential in different soil layers was 0.0202-0.0871μg · g-1 · d-1, the average value was 0.0378 μg · g-1 · d-1, and the highest methane production potential occurred in the surface soil, differing significantly from other soil depths(P<0.05). Methane production potential was inhibited by electron receptors import. When the concentrations of three kinds of electron acceptors increased from 4 to 12 mmol/L, methane production potential all dropped gradually.The methane production potential after adding nitrate and ferric was significantly different from that of controlling soils(P<0.05), but there was no significant difference when adding sulfate. There was no significant difference when the different concentration levels of the three types 08 electron receptors were applied(P>0.05). The inhibited effect of the three electron receptors on methane production potential was nitrate>ferric>sulfate; and methane production potential was partly inhibited by salt. The methane production potential dropped when the concentration increased from 4 to 12 mmol/L. The difference was not significant between the methane production potential after adding salt and controlling soil, and also the three concentration levels salt import(P>0.05).
Key words： electron acceptors; salt; estuarine marsh soil; methane production
[1] Houghton J H, Ding Y, Griggs D J, et al. Climate Change 2001:The Scientific Basis. Cambridge University Press, New York, USA,2001.
[2] Moore T R, Roulet N T, Waddington J M. Uncertainty in predicting the effect of climatic change on the carbon cycling of Canadian peatlands.Climate Change,1998,40:229~245.
[3] 王长科,吕宪国,蔡祖聪,等.氮肥对三江平原沼泽土氧化CH4的影响.地理科学,2005,25(4):490~494.
[4] 王德宣,吕宪国,丁维新,等.三江平原沼泽湿地与稻田CH4排放对比研究.地理科学,2002,22(4):500~503.
[5] 王毅勇,赵志春,宋长春.三江平原毛果苔草湿地CH4排放研究.湿地科学,2005,3(1):37~41.
[6] 王长科,吕宪国,周华荣,等.若尔盖高原沼泽土壤氧化甲烷的研究.中国环境科学,2004,24(6):646~649.
[7] 王德宣,丁维新,王毅勇.若而盖高原与三江平原沼泽湿地CH4排放差异的主要环境影响因素.湿地科学,2003,1(1):63~67.
[8] Wassmann R, Neue H U, Bueno C, et al. Methane production capacities of different rice soil derived from inherent and exogenous substrates.Plant and Soil, 1998, 203:227~237.
[9] Van der Nat F W A, Middelburg J J. Effects of two common macrophytes on methane dynamics in freshwater sediments.Biogeochemistry, 1998,43:79~104.
[10] Chasar L S,Chanton J P.Radiocarbon and stable carbon isotopic evidence for transport and transformation of dissolved organic carbon ,dissolved inorganic carbon and CH4 in a northern Minnesota peatland.Global Biogeochemical Cycle, 2000, 14:1095~1108.
[11] Dunfield P, Knowles R, Dumont R, et al. Methane production and consumption in temperate and subarctic peat soils: Response to temperature and pH.Soil Biology an d Biochemistry, 1993, 25: 321~326.
[12] 丁维新,蔡祖聪.沼泽甲烷排放及其主要影响因素.地理科学, 2002,22(5): 619 ~625.
[13] Achtnich C, Bak F,Conrad R. Competition for electron donors among nitrate reducers, ferric iron reducers, sulphate reducers and methanogens in anoxic paddy soil. Biology and Fertility of Soils,1995,19:65~72.
[14] Chidthaisong A,Conrad R.Turnover of glucose and acetate coupled to reduction of nitrate,ferrie iron and sulfate and to methanogenesis in anoxie ricefield soil.FEMS Microbiology Ecology ,2000,31: 73~76.
[15] Roden E E, Wetzel R G.Competition between Fe(III)-Reducing and methanogenic bacteria for acetate in iron rich freshwater sediments.Microbial Ecology, 2003,45:252~258.
[16] 卢昌义,叶勇,林鹏,等.海南海莲红树林土壤CH4的产生及其某些影响因素.海洋学报,1998,20(6):132~138.
[17] Magenheimer J F, Moore T R, Chmura G L, et al. Methane and carbon dioxide flux from a macrotidal salt marsh, Bay of Fundy, New Brunswich. Estuaries,1996, 19(1):139~145.
[18] Van der Gon H A C D, Neue H U.Methane emission from a wetland rice field as affected by salinity.Plant and Soil,1995,170:307~313.
[19] 俞鸣同.闽江河口北支冬季盐水入侵的分析.海洋学报,1992,11(4):17~22.
[20] 刘剑秋,曾从盛,陈宁.闽江河口湿地研究.北京:科学出版社,2006.331~334.
[21] Dasselaar A, Oenemaa O. Methane production and carbon mineralization of size and density fractions of peat soils.Soil Biology and Biochemistry,1999,3:877~886.
[22] Bergman I, Klarqvist M, Nilsson M.Seasonal variation in rates of methane production from peat of various botanical origins: Effects of temperature and substrate quality.FEMS Microbiology Ecology,2000,33:181~189.
[23] Avery G B J R, Shannon R D, White J R, et al.Controls on methane production in a tidal freshwater estuary and a peatland:Methane production via acetate fermentation and CO2 reduction.Biogeochemistry,2003,62:19~37.
[24] Lovley D R, Coates J D,Blunt-Harris E L, et al. Humic substances as electron acceptors for microbial respiration. Nature,1996,382: 445~448.
[25] Peters V, Conrad R.Sequential reduction processes and initiation of CH4 production upon flooding of oxic upland soils.Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 1996,28: 371~382.
[26] Jakobsen P, Patrick J W H,Williams B G.Sulfide and methane formation in soils and sediments.Soil Science,1981,132: 279~287.
[27] Kluber D H, Conrad R.Inhibition effect of nitrate, nitrite,NO and N2O on methanogenesis by Methanosarcina mazei.FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 1998,25(3):331~339.
[28] Van der Nat F J W A,Middelburg J J.Seasonal variation in methane oxidation by the rhizosphere of Phragmites australis and Scirpus Lacustris.Biogeochemistry, 1998, 43:79~104.
[29] Chin K, Conrad R. Intermediary metabolism in methanogenic paddy soil and the influence of temperature.FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 1995, 18:85~102.
[30] Gupta A, Flora J R V, Sayles G D,et al.Methanogenesis and sulfate reduction in chemostats-II. Model development and verification. Water Research, 1994, 28, 795 ~803.
[31] Derek R, Lovley, Elizabeth J P. Competitive mechanisms for inhibition of sulfate reduction and methane production in the zone of ferric iron reduction in sediments.Applied Environmental Microbiology, 1987,53(11): 2636~2641.
[32] Bartlett K B, Bartlett D S, Harriss R C, et al. Methane emission along a salt marsh salinity gradient. Biogeochemistry,1987,4:183~202.
[33] DeLaune R D, Smith C J, Patrick W H. Methane release from Gulf coast wetlands. Tellus, 1983, 35B: 8~15.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |