城市与乡村

1995年以来中国城市体系格局与演变——基于航空流视角

展开
  • 1. 清华大学建筑学院,北京 100084;
    2. 中山大学城市与区域规划系,广州 510275
于涛方(1974-),山东即墨人,博士,助理研究员。研究方向:全球城市区、城市竞争与竞争力。 E-mail: yutaofang@tsinghua.edu.cn

收稿日期: 2007-10-15

  修回日期: 2008-02-16

  网络出版日期: 2008-11-25

基金资助

国家自然科学重点基金(40435013)、国家自然科学基金(50578088)和北京市哲学社会科学"十一五"规划项目(06BdCS004)联合资助。

China's urban systems in terms of air passenger and cargo flows since 1995

Expand
  • 1. School of Arichitecture, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China;
    2. Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China

Received date: 2007-10-15

  Revised date: 2008-02-16

  Online published: 2008-11-25

Supported by

国家自然科学重点基金(40435013)、国家自然科学基金(50578088)和北京市哲学社会科学"十一五"规划项目(06BdCS004)联合资助。

摘要

在国内外城市体系研究航空流视角的成果基础上,运用1995年以来的中国航空统计数据,基于数据描述及重力模型和模糊参数等定量方法,分析了中国城市体系格局和变迁。主要结论有: (1 )城市体系和城市群互动符合"距离衰减原则"。同时上海、北京两大全球性城市强化了在全国的枢纽机场的地位,西部地区形成了若干区域性的枢纽机场。 (2 )枢纽度最大的城市是京津冀、长三角、厦漳泉、珠三角、成渝等区域经济中心城市。辽中南、山东半岛、江汉平原的区域中心城市的枢纽度并不突出;南京、杭州、福州和重庆虽然作为各自地区的主要经济中心城市,但其枢纽度在一定程度上受到了地区首位城市或门户城市的压制。 (3 )中国主要经济中心城市相对地位变化有如下几种类型:稳定型、上升型、下降型、先升后降型和先降后升型。长三角的经济中心城市表现出强盛的区域带动势头,而珠三角、京津冀发展相对平稳,成渝在中西部具有特殊性,表现出日益强化的区域枢纽地位,辽中南、福建沿海、关中、江汉平原等地区经济中心城市的枢纽度则相对发展缓慢,甚至有所下降。

本文引用格式

于涛方, 顾朝林, 李志刚 . 1995年以来中国城市体系格局与演变——基于航空流视角[J]. 地理研究, 2008 , 27(6) : 1407 -1418 . DOI: 10.11821/yj2008060020

Abstract

This paper examines patterns and changes of China's urban systems in terms of air traffic flows since the 1990s. The related analysis approach is mainly based on the gravity model and the fuzzy variable method. The main findings are as follows: Firstly, the pattern, the interaction and changes of China's urban systems conform to the law of"Distance Decay".The global cities, or the mega-cities, such as Beijing and Shanghai have enforced their position nationwide. While in some economic centers of the western region, such as Chengdu, Kunming, and Urumqi, the hub airports gradually grow up into regional centers. Secondly, cities of Beijing, Xiamen, Xi'an, Shenzhen, Guanghzou and Shanghai are evident as regional hubs. Most of these cities are located in the urban agglomerations,such as the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region,the Yangtze Delta Region,the Xiamen-Zhangzhou-Quanzhou Region, the Pearl River Delta Region, the Guanzhong Region, and the Chengdu-Chongqing Region etc. While cities in Liaoning, Shandong and Hubei provinces, their airports do not show evident regional hubness. And also other cities, such as Nanjing, Hangzhou, Fuzhou and Chongqing have small hubness index, because of the influence of related gateway cities or primary cities, such as Shanghai, Xiamen and Chengdu. Thirdly, the types of changes of China's main economic centers include the following ones: the steady type (eg Shenyang, Shanghai, Nanjing), the growing type (eg Tianjing, Hangzhou, Qingdao), the decaying types (eg Guangzhou, Fuzhou, Xiamen, Wuhan, Xi'an), the "increasing-decreasing" types and the "decreasing-increasing" ones. Generally speaking, cities in the Yangtze Delta Region show strong roles of regional motors, while those in the Pearl River Delta and the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region show steadiness. Hubness of cities in Liaoning Province, the coastal Fujian Province, the Guanzhong Region, and the Jianghan Region, show slow growth, even remarkable decreasing tendency.

参考文献


[1] Harvey D. Airline passenger traffic pattern within the United States. Journal of Air Law and Commerce, 1951,(18): 157~165.

[2] Richmond S B. Forecasting air passenger traffic by multiple regression analysis. Journal of Air Law and Commerce,1955,(22): 434~443.

[3] Long W H. The economics of air travel gravity model. Journal of Regional Science,1970,(10): 353~363.

[4] Murayama Y. The national urban system: The evolution of the Canadian Urban System. In: Spatial Structure of Traffic Flows. Kokon-Shoin, Tokyo,1991. 175~205.

[5] Goetz A R. Air passenger transportation and growth in the US urban system 1950-1987. Growth and Change,1992, 23 :218~242.

[6] Keeling D J. Transport and the World City paradigm. Cambridge: Cambridge university,1995.5~13.

[7] Taaffe E J. The urban hierarchy:An air passenger definition.Economic Geography, 1962,(38): 1~14.

[8] Taaffe E J. Air transportation and United States urban distribution. The Geographical Review,1958,(2):219~238.

[9] Matsumoto H. Hubness of Asian major cities in terms of international air passenger and cargo flows.The Korean Transport Policy Review,2003,(10): 103~123.

[10] Matsumoto H. International urban systems and air passenger and cargo flows: Some calculations.Journal of air Transport Management, 2004,(10):239~247.

[11] Matsumoto H. Effects of new airports on hubness of cities: A case of Osaka. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies,2005,(6):648~663.

[12] 金凤君.我国航空客流网络发展及其地域系统研究.地理研究,2001,20(1) :31~39.

[13] 金凤君.轴-辐侍服理念下的中国航空网络模式构筑.地理学报,2005,(5):774~784.

[14] 金凤君,孙炜,萧世伦.我国航空公司重组及其对航空网络结构的影响.地理科学进展,2005,24(2) :59~68.

[15] 王成金,金凤君.从航空国际网络看我国对外联系的空间演变.经济地理,2005,(5):667~672.

[16] 王法辉,金凤君,等.中国航空客运网络空间演化模式研究.地理科学,2003,23(5):519~526.

[17] 王娇娥,金凤君,等.中国机场体系的空间格局及其服务水平.地理学报,2006,(8):829~838.

[18] 郭文炯,白明英.中国城市航空运输职能等级及航空联系特征的实证研究.人文地理,1999 ,14 (1):27~31.

[19] 周一星,等.从航空运输看中国城市体系的空间网络结构.地理研究,2002,(3):276~286.

[20] 周一星,张莉.改革开放条件下的中国城市经济区.地理学报,2003,(2):271~283.

文章导航

/