居民旅游影响感知和态度的空间分异——以黄山风景区为例
收稿日期: 2007-11-01
修回日期: 2008-03-26
网络出版日期: 2008-07-25
基金资助
国家自然科学基金(40371030);国家社科基金(07BJY134);安徽大学人才队伍建设基金
Study on spatial differentiation of residents&rsquo|perceptions and attitudes to tourism impacts: A case study of Huangshan Scenic Area
Received date: 2007-11-01
Revised date: 2008-03-26
Online published: 2008-07-25
Supported by
国家自然科学基金(40371030);国家社科基金(07BJY134);安徽大学人才队伍建设基金
以黄山风景区为例,通过问卷调查,采用SPSS统计软件和ArcView GIS技术,揭示了旅游地居民对旅游影响感知和态度的空间分异特征。研究表明,周边地区居民对黄山风景区旅游影响的感知和态度呈现较为明显的空间分异。一定地域范围内,居民对旅游积极影响感知强度距离衰减,对旅游消极影响感知强度距离递增;在更广泛的地域范围内,受区域旅游空间结构和"飞地旅游"特征的影响,居民对旅游积极和消极影响的感知强度分别呈现"W"型和"M"型的空间分异特征。进一步分析了居民对风景区的了解程度、旅游流作用机制、交通线路、居民的响应程度等因素对居民旅游影响感知和态度空间分异的影响。
李东和, 张 捷, 章尚正, 方 超 . 居民旅游影响感知和态度的空间分异——以黄山风景区为例[J]. 地理研究, 2008 , 27(4) : 963 -973 . DOI: 10.11821/yj2008040024
Residents' perceptions and attitudes to tourism impacts have been a hot study issue of both tourism geography and tourism sociology. In foreign tourism studies, the distance between the residents' habitations and tourists' attractions has been taken as a main factor in explaining the differences of residents' perceptions and attitudes to tourism impacts. However, similar studies are not found in domestic literatures in China. Considering the above conditions, taking Huangshan Scenic Area as an example, with the aid of questionnaire survey, using techniques of SPSS and Arc View GIS, spatial differentiation of residents' perceptions and attitudes to tourism impacts bought by Huangshan Scenic Area are revealed. The results indicate that residents in the hinterland of Huangshan Scenic Area show evident spatial differentiation of their perceptions and attitudes to tourism impacts brought by Huangshan Scenic Area. In determinate spatial scale, the intensity of residents perceptions and attitudes to positive tourism impacts wane and negative tourism impacts augment as the distance increases; in a more extensive space, affected by its tourism spatial structure and enclave tourism mode, the spatial differentiations of residents' perceptions and attitudes to tourism impacts brought by Huangshan Scenic Area take on "W-shaped" structure and "M-shaped" structure to positive tourism impacts and negative tourism impacts respectively. Also, the forming mechanisms leading to the above differentiation rules of residents' perceptions and attitudes to tourism impacts were analyzed, which are residents' knowledge of the scenic area, acting mechanism of tourist flows, transportation routes and residents' response to tourism development. It is thought that we can't oversimply deduce that the residents' perceptions and attitudes are "distance decay" or "distance increase". The tourism spatial structure and its subsequent effect should be taken into account when we analyze the spatial differentiation of residents' perceptions and attitudes to tourism impacts. The aim of this study is to reveal the spatial differentiation of tourism impacts, so as to offer some guidelines in optimizing regional tourism benefit and making community-oriented humanism regional tourism development strategies.
[1] Sheldon P J, T Abenoja. Resident attitudes in a mature destination: The case of Waikiki.Tourism Management, 2001, 22: 435~443.
[2] 唐顺铁.旅游目的地的社区化及社区旅游研究.地理研究, 1998, 17(2): 145~149.
[3] 赵玉宗,李东和,黄明丽.国外旅游地居民旅游感知和态度研究综述.旅游学刊, 2005, 20(4): 85~92.
[4] Belisle F J, D R Hoy. The perceived impact of tourism by residents: A case study in Santa Marta, Columbia.Annals of Tourism Research, 1980, 7(1): 83~101.
[5] Pearce J A. Host community acceptance of foreign tourists: Strategic considerations .Annals of Tourism Research, 1980, 7(2): 224~233.
[6] Sheldon P J, T Var. Resident attitudes to tourism in North Wales. Tourism Management, 1984, 5: 40~47.
[7] Murphy P E, B Andressen. Tourism development on Vancouver Island: An assessment of the Core-Periphery Model. The Professional Geographer, 1988, 40: 32~42.
[8] Keogh B. Resident and recreationists’ perceptions and attitudes with respect to tourism development. Journal of Applied Recreation Research, 1990, 15(2): 71~83.
[9] Mansfeld Y. Group-differentiated perceptions of social impacts related to tourism development. Professional Geographer, 1992,44: 377~392.
[10] Uriely N, A Israeli,A reichel. Heritage proximity and resident attitudes toward tourism development. Annals of Tourism Research, 2002, 29(3): 859~862.
[11] Williams J,R Lawson. Community issues and resident opinions of tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 2001, 28(2): 269~290.
[12] Pizam A.Tourism’s impacts: The social costs to the destination community as perceived by its residents. Journal of Travel Research, 1978, 16(4): 8~12.
[13] Madrigal R.A tale of tourism in two cities. Annals of Tourism Research, 1993, 20: 336~353.
[14] Faulkner B, C Tideswell. A framework for monitoring community impacts of tourism. Journal of Sustainable Tourism,1997,5: 3~28.
[15] Jurowski C, D Gursoy. Distance effects on residents’ attitudes toward tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 2004, 31(2): 296~312.
[16] 刘振礼.旅游对接待地的社会影响及对策.旅游学刊, 1992, 7 (3): 52~55.
[17] 宣国富,陆林,章锦河,等.海滨旅游地居民对旅游影响的感知——海南省海口市及三亚市实证研究.地理科学, 2002, 22(6): 741~746.
[18] 苏勤,林炳耀.基于态度与行为的我国旅游地居民的类型划分——以西递、周庄、九华山为例.地理研究, 2004, 23(1): 104~114.
[19] 刘婕,曾涛,蔡红霞,等.九寨沟旅游开发对安多藏民族文化的影响.资源科学, 2004, 26(4): 57~64.
[20] 陆林.旅游地居民态度调查研究——以皖南旅游区为例.自然资源学报, 1996, 11(4): 377~382.
[21] 刘益.旅游开发对社区居民经济影响的时空分异特征研究——以丹霞山、世外桃源景区为例.经济地理, 2006, 26(4): 706~709.
[22] 郑度.关于地理学的区域性和地域分异研究.地理研究, 1998, 17(1): 4~9.
[23] 阎守邕,丁纪,濮静娟,等.中国旅游资源分区的初步研究.自然资源学报, 1989, 4(2): 112~122.
[24] 张捷, 都金康, 周寅康, 等.自然观光旅游地客源市场的空间结构研究——以九寨沟及比较风景区为例. 地理学报, 1999, 54(4): 357~364.
[25] 保继刚, 郑海燕, 戴光全. 桂林国内客源市场的空间结构演变. 地理学报, 2002, 57(1): 96~106.
[26] 宣国富, 陆林, 汪德根, 等. 三亚市旅游客流空间特性研究. 地理研究, 2004, 23(1): 115~124.
[27] 牛亚菲, 谢丽波, 刘春凤. 北京市旅游客流时空分布特征与调控对策. 地理研究, 2005, 24(2): 283~292.
[28] 苏平, 党宁, 吴必虎. 北京环城游憩带旅游地类型与空间结构特征. 地理研究, 2004, 23(3): 403~410.
[29] 陆林,余凤龙.中国旅游经济差异的空间特征分析.经济地理, 2005, 25(3): 406~410.
[30] Mbaiwa J E.Enclave tourism and its socio-economic impacts in the Okavango Delta, Botswana. Tourism Management, 2005, 26: 157~172.
[31] 杨桂华.生态旅游景区开发. 北京: 科学出版社, 2004.6.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |