EN中文

地理研究 >

2010 , Vol. 29 >Issue 9: 1594 - 1605

DOI: https://doi.org/10.11821/yj2010090006

地表过程研究

基于信息量与逻辑回归模型的次生滑坡灾害敏感性评价——以汶川县北部为例

展开
  • 1. 灾害评估与风险防范民政部重点实验室,北京 100048;
    2. 首都师范大学资源环境与旅游学院,北京 100048;
    3. 民政部国家减灾中心,北京 100053
陶舒(1986-),女,博士生,主要从事遥感与GIS在资源环境、自然灾害等领域的应用研究。 E-mail: taoshuxuxu@163.com ;
胡德勇(1974-),男,副教授,主要从事遥感与GIS在资源环境、自然灾害等领域的应用研究。 E-mail :deyonghu@163.com.

收稿日期: 2009-10-06

  修回日期: 2010-04-13

  网络出版日期: 2010-09-20

基金资助

国家自然科学基金资助项目(40901227);国家高技术研究发展计划资助项目(2007AA120306)

收起

Susceptibility assessment of secondary landslides triggered by earthquakes: A case study of northern Wenchuan

Expand
  • 1. Key Laboratory of Integrated Disaster Assessment and Risk Governance of the Ministry of Civil Affairs, Beijing 100048, China;
    2. College of Resources Environment &|Tourism, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China;
    3. National Disaster Reduction Center,Ministry of Civil Affairs of China,Beijing 100053,China

Received date: 2009-10-06

  Revised date: 2010-04-13

  Online published: 2010-09-20

Fold

摘要

次生滑坡灾害的影响是震后较长时间里人们持续关注的焦点,对其开展敏感性评价具有重要意义。选取5.12地震的重灾区汶川县北部作为研究区,利用遥感与地理信息技术提取地震滑坡信息,在全面分析滑坡与高程、坡度、坡向、岩性、断裂带、地震烈度以及水系等7个影响因子相关特性的基础上,采用信息量法与逻辑回归模型进行灾害敏感性评价,将研究区划分为极轻度、轻度、中度、高度和极高危险5个级别,并对不同模型的适用性开展分析和对比。结果表明,逻辑回归模型在描述区域滑坡灾害危险度总体特征方面稍具优势。

关键词： 汶川; 地震; 次生滑坡; 敏感性评价

本文引用格式

陶舒, 胡德勇, 赵文吉, 范一大, 王志恒 . 基于信息量与逻辑回归模型的次生滑坡灾害敏感性评价——以汶川县北部为例[J]. 地理研究, 2010 , 29(9) : 1594 -1605 . DOI: 10.11821/yj2010090006

Abstract

The Ms 8.0 Wenchuan earthquake, which occurred on 12 May 2008 in Sichuan Province, collapsed a great many houses and injured thousands of people. Undoubtedly, it can be predicted that secondary earthquake landslides, as a common secondary hazard triggered by earthquakes, will draw much attention during a long time after earthquake due to the severe geological hazard. In order to remove threat from the secondary disasters effectively, this study used remote sensing and GIS to generate susceptibility maps, taking the case of northern Wenchuan County. Seven factors affecting landslide occurrence have been taken into account in the susceptibility assessment, including elevation, slope, aspect, lithology, seismic intensity, distance to faults and rivers. According to the probability that predicts the possibility of landslide occurrence by information value method and logistic regression separately, the study area was ultimately categorized into five classes, namely, "extremely low", "low", "moderate", "high" and "very high". The result has proved to reflect closely the spatial distributions of landslides in the study area. Subsequently, these two probabilistic and statistical approaches for estimating the susceptible areas of the study area of Wenchuan County were tested. It can be concluded that the predictive capability of logistic regression model appears to be more accurate compared to information value method. It is mainly due to the fact that logistic regression could reduce effectively the subjectivity in selection of evaluation factors and weight assignment.

Key words： Wenchuan; earthquake; secondary landslide; susceptibility assessment

参考文献


[1] 李光, 姚大全, 张有林. 汶川8.0 级地震崩塌、滑坡的发育特点. 防灾科技学院学报, 2008, 10(3): 131~134.

[2] 胡德勇, 李京, 陈云浩, 等. GIS 支持下滑坡灾害空间预测方法研究. 遥感学报, 2007, 11(6): 852 ~859.

[3] 陈晓利, 赵健, 叶洪. 应用径向基概率神经网络研究地震滑坡. 地震地质, 2006,28(3): 430~440.

[4] Lee S, Ryu J, Min K, et al. Development and application of landslides susceptibility analysis techniques using Geographic Information System(GIS). Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 2000, 1: 319~327.

[5] 吴益平, 唐辉明. 滑坡灾害空间预测研究. 地质科技情报, 2001, 20(2): 87~90.

[6] 石菊松, 徐瑞春, 石玲. 基于RS 和GIS 技术的清江隔河岩库区滑坡易发性评价与制图. 地学前缘, 2007, 14(6): 119~128.

[7] 朱良峰, 吴信才, 殷坤龙. 基于GIS 的中国滑坡灾害风险分析. 岩土力学, 2003, 24(增): 221~230.

[8] Van Westen C J, Rengers N, Soeters R. Use of geomorphological information in indirect landslide susceptibility assessment. Natural Hazards, 2003, 30: 399~419.

[9] Rowbotham D N, Dudycha D. GIS modelling of slope stability in Phewa Tal watershed, Nepal. Geomorphology, 1998,(26):151~170.

[10] 赵建华, 陈汉林, 杨树锋. 滑坡灾害危险性评价模型比较. 自然灾害学报, 2006, 15(1): 128~134.

[11] Greco R, Sorriso-Valvo M, Catalano E. Logistic regression analysis in the evaluation of mass movements susceptibility: The Aspromonte case study, Calabria, Italy. Engineering Geology, 2007, 89: 47~66.

[12] 曾忠平, 汪华斌, 张志, 等. 地理信息系统/遥感技术支持下三峡库区青干河流域滑坡危险性评价. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2006, 25(增): 2777~2784.

[13] 汪华斌, Sassa Kyoji. 蒙特卡罗模拟在区域地震滑坡灾害评价中应用. 岩土力学, 2007, 28(12): 2565~2569.

[14] 程思, 易加强. 四川汶川县地质灾害的成因及防治对策. 地质灾害与环境保护, 2007, 18(4): 1~6.

[15] 殷跃平. 汶川地震地质与滑坡灾害概论. 北京: 地质出版社, 2009.

[16] 李铁锋, 徐岳仁, 潘懋, 等. 基于多期SPOT-5影像的降雨型浅层滑坡遥感解译研究. 北京大学学报(自然科学版), 2007, 43(2): 204~210.

[17] 胡德勇, 赵文吉, 李小娟, 等. 不完备样本条件下基于支持向量回归模型的滑坡易发性评价. 地理研究, 2008, 27(4): 755~762.

[18] 李军, 周成虎. 基于栅格GIS 滑坡风险评价方法中格网大小选取分析. 遥感学报, 2003, 7(2): 86~92.

[19] 李忠生. 国内外地震滑坡灾害研究综述. 灾害学, 2003,18(4):64~70.

[20] 陈晓利, 冉洪流, 祁生文. 1976 年龙陵地震诱发滑坡的影响因子敏感性分析. 北京大学学报(自然科学版), 2009, (1): 104~110.

[21] 朱良峰, 吴信才, 殷坤龙, 等. 基于信息量模型的中国滑坡灾害风险区划研究. 地球科学与环境学报, 2004, 26(3): 52~56.

[22] 王济川, 郭志刚. Logistic回归模型方法与应用. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2001. 6~11.

[23] Sridevi Jadi. 斜坡不稳定性分类的统计模型. 世界地质, 1997, 16 (1): 83~88.

Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉