休闲城市评价指标体系及其实证研究
收稿日期: 2009-05-03
修回日期: 2010-03-26
网络出版日期: 2010-09-20
基金资助
教育部人文社科基地重大项目(2009JJD790013);河南省社科规划项目(2007BYS002)
Study on the index system to evaluate leisure city and its application
Received date: 2009-05-03
Revised date: 2010-03-26
Online published: 2010-09-20
目前,迫切需要一套切实可行的评价指标体系和评价方法来衡量城市自身的休闲实力和休闲发展能力,以此判断一个城市是否具有建设休闲城市的资质和条件。本文综述了当前人们对休闲城市评价指标体系的看法,在对休闲城市内涵分析的基础上,构建了一套切实可行的休闲城市评价指标体系。以此为依据,借助SPSS统计分析软件,运用因子分析法评价了杭州、成都、大连、青岛和南京等15个城市的休闲水平和实力。结果表明,深圳、杭州、成都、北京休闲主体意识、休闲设施水平较高,而厦门、上海、大连、杭州休闲环境较为适宜。就综合休闲实力相比,北京、上海、深圳、广州、杭州水平较高,充分证明了其构建休闲城市的实力和基础。
曹新向, 苗长虹, 陈玉英, 王伟红 . 休闲城市评价指标体系及其实证研究[J]. 地理研究, 2010 , 29(9) : 1695 -1705 . DOI: 10.11821/yj2010090015
In order to survey whether a city has the potentials and conditions to develop leisure economy at present, we need to set up a workable evaluation index system and evaluation method to measure the leisure degree and leisure development capacity of a city. This article first analyzed different viewpoints on the Leisure City evaluation index system and summarized the concept and meaning of Leisure City, and then discussed the index system and quantitative method to evaluate Leisure City. With the help of SPSS software, this study took 15 cities in China including Hangzhou, Chengdu, Dalian, Qingdao and Nanjing as examples and analyzed their leisure level and strength. The result showed that Shenzhen, Hangzhou, Chengdu and Beijing had higher leisure consciousness and richer and better leisure facilities, while Xiamen, Shanghai, Dalian and Hangzhou had more appropriate leisure environment. As far as integrated leisure strength was concerned, Beijing, Shanghai, Shenzhen, Guangzhou and Hangzhou had higher leisure comprehensive development degree. Finally, we discussed the issue on how China would build top Leisure City, and put forward some future research proposals on this issue.
Key words： Leisure City; evaluation index system; quantitative method
[1] 袁华明.休闲之都争夺战.观察与思考,2006,(9):28~29.
[2] 《小康》杂志编辑部.中国10大休闲城市.小康,2006,(12):17.
[3] 崔凤君.城市旅游的发展与实践.北京:中国旅游出版社,2005.141~160.
[4] Hall M C, Page S J. The Geography of Tourism and Recreation . London: Routledge,2007.
[5] Curry N R. Community participation in outdoor recreation and the development of Millennium Greens in England. Leisure Studies,2000,19(1):17~35.
[6] Veal A J. Leisure Policy and Planning. London: Pitman,1994.
[7] Lee I, et al. The relationship between information use and park awareness: A study of urban park users. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration,2002,20(1):21~44.
[8] 马惠娣,张景安.中国公众休闲状况调查.北京:中国经济出版社,2004.
[9] 王丽梅.沈阳市居民休闲方式选择倾向及其特征研究.桂林旅游高等专科学校学报,2005, 16(3):19~23.
[10] 杨国良.城市居民休闲行为特征研究. 旅游学刊,2002,17(2):52~56.
[11] 逄爱梅,王何.对上海市民周末休闲的透视.上海综合经济,2004,(7):63~67.
[12] 关丽萍, 何瑛.乌鲁木齐市居民休闲活动特征研究. 新疆师范大学学报,2005,24(3):243~246.
[13] 郑胜华,刘嘉龙.城市休闲发展评估指标体系研究.自然辩证法研究,2006,22(3):96~101.
[14] 闪媛媛.休闲城市指标体系研究.杭州:浙江大学硕士学位论文,2005.
[15] 王晓丽,王学峰.国内城市构建"休闲之都"的资质条件分析.资源开发与市场,2007,23(2):122~124.
[16] 魏小安,李莹.城市休闲与休闲城市.旅游学刊,2007,22(10):71~76.
[17] 杰佛瑞·戈比. 将无锡变成一个休闲城市. http://tour-zt.wuxi.gov.cn/xuxiake/z_news.asp?id=143.
[18] 杰拉德·凯尼恩.成为一个休闲城市——顺应时代潮流. http://www.wuxitour.com.cn/xuxiake/z_news.asp?id=145.
[19] 吕志墉. "休闲之都"花落谁家. http://house.focus.cn/showarticle/4631/527217.html.
[20] 杨振之,杨坤. 也谈休闲城市与城市休闲. 旅游学刊,2008,23(12):51~57.
[21] 何建民.城市休闲产业与产品的发展导向研究.旅游学刊,2008,23(7):13~17.
[22] 张梦.区域旅游产业竞争力评价:指标体系与评价方法.旅游学刊,2007,22(2):22~26.
[23] 倪鹏飞.中国城市竞争力报告NO.5. 北京:社会科学文献出版社,2007.
[24] 汪德根,陈田,等.发达地区居民对节假日调整影响休闲旅游的感知分析——以上海、杭州和苏州为例.地理研究,2009,28(5):1414~1426.
[25] 孟斌,尹卫红,等.北京宜居城市满意度的空间特征.地理研究,2009,28(5):1318~1326.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |