EN中文

地理研究 >

2008 , Vol. 27 >Issue 3: 502 - 509

DOI: https://doi.org/10.11821/yj2008030003

地表过程研究

区域洪水灾害风险格局演变分析——以马来西亚吉兰丹州为例

展开
  • 1. 北京师范大学地表过程与资源生态国家重点实验室, 北京100875;
    2. 民政部/教育部减灾与应急管理研究院, 北京100875;
    3. 安徽省气象局, 合肥 230061;
    4. 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所,北京 100101;
    5. 中国地图出版社 教材研究所, 北京 100054
蒋卫国 (1976-),湖南衡阳,博士,讲师。主要从事遥感与GIS在流域洪水灾害与生态环境的应用研究。

收稿日期: 2007-11-12

  修回日期: 2008-02-14

  网络出版日期: 2008-05-25

基金资助

国家自然科学基金 (40701172) 、高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金资助项目(20070027018) 、淮河流域气象开放研究基金联合资助。

收起

Change and spatial pattern of flood disaster risk

Expand
  • 1. State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China;
    2. Academy of Disaster Reduction and Emergence Management, Ministry of Civil Affairs and Ministry of Education, Beijing 100875, China;
    3. Anhui Meteorological Bureau, Hefei 230061, China;
    4. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China;
    5. SinoMaps Press, Beijing 100054, China

Received date: 2007-11-12

  Revised date: 2008-02-14

  Online published: 2008-05-25

Supported by

国家自然科学基金 (40701172) 、高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金资助项目(20070027018) 、淮河流域气象开放研究基金联合资助。

Fold

摘要

准确了解区域洪水灾害风险演变状况及规律,对于洪水灾害预警与管理具有重要意义。本文利用1990年和2000年洪水灾害风险等级数据和风险指数数据,分析了10年来区域洪水灾害风险演变规律。研究表明:(1)1990~2000年10年之间,研究区的洪水灾害风险在空间分布格局及时间演变过程上都发生了显著变化。(2)高风险区与较高风险区的面积在增加,较低风险区、中等风险区的面积在逐渐减少,这是区域洪水灾害风险等级结构变化最突出的特征。(3)区域洪水灾害风险等级之间的不对等转化是各种风险等级结构特征发生实质性变化的主要原因。(4)2000年区域洪水灾害风险较1990年高,整个区域洪水灾害风险在增加,但局部地区洪水灾害风险变化不一。(5)区域洪水灾害风险演变的本质就是风险等级类型结构和功能的自组织,对于揭示洪水灾害演变的普遍现象和机制具有重要意义。

关键词： 洪水灾害; 风险演变; 空间格局

本文引用格式

蒋卫国, 盛绍学, 朱晓华, 左 伟 . 区域洪水灾害风险格局演变分析——以马来西亚吉兰丹州为例[J]. 地理研究, 2008 , 27(3) : 502 -509 . DOI: 10.11821/yj2008030003

Abstract

Flood disasters are among the world's most frequent and damaging types of disaster. Flood hazard, flood risk and disasters are the products of an interaction between environmental and social processes. Accurate comprehension of the condition and rule of flood disaster risk change is of critical importance for early warning and flood disaster administering.The study area, situated in the northeast of Kelantan Delta in Malaysia, is the main flood disaster area. In the other papers, the maps and data of flood disaster risk zones and flood risk index have been calculated using the Fuzzy Comprehensive Assessment (FCA) method. In this paper, the condition and rule of risk change in the past decade are analyzed based on risk zone data and risk index data of flood disasters in 1990 and 2000. The risk data of the two phases are overlaid and areas of risk zone changes are summarized. Risk dynamic degree, transition matrix of risk zone change, risk index change, and the mean of change are calculated. Some conclusions are drawn as follows: (1) The variation of risk zones is significant in the spatial pattern and time change from 1990 to 2000. (2) Highest risk zone and higher risk zone are increasing. Moderate risk zone and lower risk zone are decreasing. (3) Conversion among risk zones is lopsided. It is the main reason for the variation taking place in the spatial pattern of risk zones.(4) Mean risk index of 2000 is higher than that of 1990 in the whole area. Risk change is different in the local zones. (5) The change process of flood disaster risk is self-organized and complex. The self-organized character of flood disaster system is significant to reveal the internal universal phenomenon and mechanism.

Key words： flood disaster; risk change; spatial pattern

参考文献


[1] 蒋卫国. 基于遥感与GIS的洪水灾害风险模糊评估及其演变驱动机制研究.北京师范大学博士论文,2006.16~99.

[2] Ross S Lunetta, Christopher D Elvidge. Remote Sensing Change Detection. Princeton, USA: Taylor and Frances Press. 1999.5~20.

[3] 李德仁.利用遥感影像进行变化检测.武汉大学学报(信息科学版),2003,28:7~12.

[4] 马建文,田国良,王长耀.遥感变化检测技术发展综述.地球科学进展,2004,19(2):192~196.

[5] 赵英时,等.遥感应用分析原理与方法.北京:科学出版社,2003.241~250.

[6] 陈云浩,李小兵,陈晋,史培军. 1983-1992年中国陆地植被NDVI演变特征的变化矢量分析.遥感学报,2002,6(1):12 ~18.

[7] 蒋卫国,陈云浩,李京.中国北方农牧交错带生态环境的空间格局演变.自然资源学报,2005,20(6): 871~878.

[8] 侯西勇,庄大方,于信芳.20世纪90年代新疆草地资源的空间格局演变.地理学报,2004,59(3): 409~417.

[9] Anselmo V, Galeati G, Palmieri S, et al.Flood risk assessment using an integrated hydrological and hydraulic modelling approach: A case study. Journal of Hydrology, 1996,175: 533~554.

[10] Ministry of Civil Defence & Emergency Management. Waiho River Flooding Risk Assessment Report. 2002. 1~51.http://www.civildefence.govt.nz/memwebsite.nsf/Files/MCDEMWaihoRiverRiskAssessment.

[11] Tawatchai Tingsanchali, Mohammed Fazlul Karim.Flood hazard and risk analysis in the southwest region of Bangladesh. Hydrological Process,2005,19:2055~2069.

[12] 赵士鹏.闽江上游地区山洪灾害风险评估.地理研究, 1997, 16(1):98~103.

[13] 黄诗峰,周成虎,万庆,等. 洪水灾害风险评价初析.地理研究, 1998,17(增刊): 71~77.

[14] 周成虎,万庆,黄诗峰.基于GIS的洪水灾害风险区划研究. 地理学报, 2000, 55(1):15~24.

[15] 唐川,朱静.基于GIS的山洪灾害风险区划.地理学报, 2005, 60(1): 87~94.

[16] Department Irrigation and Drainage (DID). National Register of River Basins. Final Report, Volume 2.8, Updating of Condition of Flooding in Malaysia, State Report for Kelantan. 2003.10~35.

[17] 高吉喜, 中村武洋,潘英姿.洪水易损性评价——洞庭湖地区案例研究.北京:中国环境科学出版社,2004.30~60.

[18] 蒋卫国, 王文杰,谢志仁.基于RS和GIS的三江平原湿地景观变化研究.地理与地理信息科学,2003,19(2):28~31.

Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉