东北地区玉米低温冷害气候和经济损失风险分区
收稿日期: 2007-12-06
修回日期: 2008-06-10
网络出版日期: 2008-09-25
基金资助
国家"十·五"科技攻关项目(2004BA509B14)
The risk division on climate and economic loss of maize chilling damage in Northeast China
Received date: 2007-12-06
Revised date: 2008-06-10
Online published: 2008-09-25
Supported by
国家"十·五"科技攻关项目(2004BA509B14)
马树庆, 王 琪, 王春乙, 霍治国 . 东北地区玉米低温冷害气候和经济损失风险分区[J]. 地理研究, 2008 , 27(5) : 1169 -1177 . DOI: 10.11821/yj2008050020
The thermal condition, occurring frequency, risk index and climatic risk probability of the maize chilling damage in Northeast China were analyzed, and the synthetic climatic risk index and model were developed. Northeast China was divided into five climatic risk areas(highest, higher, moderate, lower and lowest)using synthetic climatic risk index. The risk evaluation model of climate-economic loss of the chilling damage was developed using synthetic climatic risk index,considering the maize’s output and proportion of planting area.On this basis, Northeast China was divided into five typical damage areas of economic loss risk, including the highest, higher, moderate, lower and lowest one. Then the authors put forward relevant measures to reduce the damage risk in different areas. The difference in damage risk is obvious in different areas. The northern and eastern parts of Northeast China are the highest climatic risk areas, and southwestern Jilin and most parts of Liaoning are the lower ones. The central part of Northeast China, the northern part of Heilongjiang and eastern Jilin are the highest risk areas on economic loss, western Jilin and northeastern Liaoning are moderate, the central and eastern parts of Liaoning are lower, and southern Liaoning is the lowest one even without risk. Though the climate becomes warm, the supply-demand relation of thermal condition of maize production is still tense as a result of the increasing proportions of maize production(especially the late-ripe species). Therefore, the chilling damage risk is still high in most parts of Northeast China, and we should positively control the chilling damage under the condition of climatic change.The main measure to reduce the damage risk firstly is to improve the planting structure, adjust the maize variety proportion in different areas; and secondly is to use the cultivating technique of resisting the damage for promoting the resistibility.
[1] 张养才,何维勋,李世奎.中国农业气象灾害概论.北京:气象出版社,1991.25~30.
[2] 王书裕.作物低温冷害研究.北京:气象出版社,1995.116~120.
[3] 马树庆.吉林省农业气候研究.北京:气象出版社,1996.166~180.
[4] 马树庆,王琪.东北区低温冷害致灾因素的分析.自然灾害学报,2003,12(2):182~187.
[5] 马树庆,刘玉英,王琪.玉米低温冷害动态评估和预测方法.应用生态学报,2006.17(10):1905~1910.
[6] 孙玉亭,王书裕,杨永歧.东北区作物冷害研究.气象学报,1983,41(3):313~321.
[7] 王春乙,郭建平.作物冷害综合防御技术研究.北京:气象出版社,1999.175~211.
[8] 王书裕.我国作物冷害研究进展.气象科技,1984,(4):75~79.
[9] 王春乙.重大农业气象灾害研究进展.北京:气象出版社,2007.263~277.
[10] 王春乙,王石立,霍治国,等.近十年来中国主要农业气象灾害监测预警与评估技术研究进展.气象学报, 2005,63(5):659~671.
[11] 徐祥徳,王馥棠,萧永生.农业气象防灾调控工程与技术系统.北京:气象出版社,2002.10~85.
[12] 高素华.玉米低温冷害机理研究综述.见:王春乙,郭建平.作物冷害综合防御技术研究.北京:气象出版社,1999.1~8.
[13] William J Petak,Arthur A Atkisson. Natural hazard risk assessment and polic policy anticipating: The unexpected. Springer-Verag New York Inc,1982.
[14] Vincent T Covello,Kazuhiko Kawamura,et al.Cooperation versus comfrontation:A comparison of approaches to envionmental risk management in Japan and the United State.Risk Analysis,1988,8(2):247~260.
[15] 李世奎,霍治国,王道龙,等.中国农业灾害风险评估与对策.北京:气象出版社,1999.25~30,222~229.
[16] 马树庆,王琪,袭祝香.东北玉米低温冷害风险评估研究.自然灾害学报,2003,12(3):137~141.
[17] 霍治国,李世奎,王素艳,等.主要农业气象灾害风险评估技术及其应用研究.自然资源学报,2003,18(6):692~703.
[18] 张继权,刘兴朋,佟志军. 草原火灾风险评价与分区——以吉林省西部草原为例,地理研究, 2007, 26(4): 755~761.
[19] 马树庆,袭祝香,安刚,等.吉林省农业界限温度条件变化规律研究.地理科学,1999,19(1),66~68.
[20] 王绍武,马树庆,陈莉,等.低温冷害.北京:气象出版社,2008.(待出版).
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |