黄土高原半干旱区天然锦鸡儿灌丛对土壤水分的影响
收稿日期: 2004-01-08
修回日期: 2004-05-23
网络出版日期: 2005-02-15
基金资助
国家重点基础研究发展规划项目"草地与农牧交错带生态系统重建机理及优化生态生产范式(G2000018605)
Effects of natural shrub of Caragana opulens Kom. on soil moisture in a semiarid area on the Loess Plateau
Received date: 2004-01-08
Revised date: 2004-05-23
Online published: 2005-02-15
本文选择黄土高原半干旱区定西地区的一种地带性植被,天然甘蒙锦鸡儿灌丛,将其0～99m深的土壤水分含量与人工柠条锦鸡儿灌丛、人工杏树林、天然草地、放牧荒坡和农地的土壤水分含量进行了比较。结果发现,天然锦鸡儿灌丛在1m以下土壤各层的水分含量均高于人工柠条灌丛和人工杏树林,而与放牧荒坡和农地的土壤湿度接近,略低于农地。天然锦鸡儿灌丛4m以上土层的土壤湿度还明显高于天然草地;天然锦鸡儿灌丛形成的难效—无效水层深度在2m土层以上,而人工柠条灌丛形成的难效无效水层则深达56m,人工杏树林42m,天然草地、放牧荒坡分别为36m和33m,农地1m。
王志强, 刘宝元, 王晓兰 . 黄土高原半干旱区天然锦鸡儿灌丛对土壤水分的影响[J]. 地理研究, 2005 , 24(1) : 113 -120 . DOI: 10.11821/yj2005010013
This study has chosen the shrubs of Caragana opulens Kom., a natural zonal vegetation in the semiarid area on northwest Loess Plateau, and compared its soil moisture from 09.9m to those of re-vegetated shrubs of C.korshinskii Kom., re-vegetated almond forest, natural grassland （protected） dominated by Stipa breviflora, intensively grazed grassland and continuous cropland. Soil moistures were measured at the depth over 3m with an interval of 0.2m beneath and with an interval of 0.3m. The purpose was to testify the hypothesis that the zonal natural shrub vegetation consumes less soil water than re-vegetated shrub and forest vegetations. The results show that the soil moisture of natural shrub of C.opulens Kom. was largely higher than those of re-vegetated shrub of C.Korshinskii Kom. and almond forest beneath 1m in soil profile, close to those of intensively grazed grassland and cropland,but slightly lower than cropland. The average soil moisture in 09.9m soil profiles of natural shrub of C.opulens, re-vegetated shrub of C.korshinskii, re-vegetated almond forest, natural grassland, intensively grazed grassland and cropland were 9.5%, 7.4%, 7.7%, 8.5%, 9.3% and 9.8%, respectively.and the average soil water moisture from 19.9m are 10.2%, 7.6%, 8.1%, 9.0%, 10.6% and 10.0% respectively. The soil moisture of natural shrub land of C.opulens was higher than the soil moisture of natural grassland between the soil layer of 04m, but beneath 4m, their soil moistures were essentially the same. All vegetation types have resulted in a continuous dry soil layer within which the soil moistures were hard or unavailable to vegetation. The thickness of hard or unavailable water moisture layers of natural shrub of C.opulens , re-vegetated shrub of C.korshinskii,re-vegetated almond forest, natural grassland, intensively grazed grassland and cropland were 2, 5.6, 4.2, 3.6, 3.3 and 1.0m, respectively. According to previous studies, the layer of unavailable soil moisture above 2m in soil profile is rechargeable by annual precipitation in the study area, but it hardly can be recharged by precipitation for unavailable soil water layers beneath 2m. From this initial study, we concluded that the natural shrubs of C.opulens consumes less soil water than re-vegetated shrubs of C.korshinskii, re-vegetated almond forest, underlining the importance of the role of zonal vegetation in the vegetation reconstruction in the study area.
[1] Robert G,Kremer E,Raymond H J,et al1Simulating vegetational and hydrologic responses to natural climatic variationand GCM-p redicted climate change in a sem i-arid ecosystem in W ashington,U1S1A11 Journal of A rid Environments,1996,33:23～38.
[2] 张军涛,李哲,郑度.温度与降水变化的小波分析及其环境效应解释.地理研究,21(1):54～60.
[3] 满志敏,等.气候变化对历史上农牧过渡带影响的个例研究.地理研究,2000,12(2):141～147.
[4] 刘俊峰,等.甘肃平凉地区约80万年以来的植被与气候变迁.地理研究,1994,13(4):90～97.
[5] Grason R B,W estern A W,Chiew F H S1 Preferred states in spatial soil moisture patterns:local and nonlocal controls.W ater Resources Research,1997,33:2897～2908.
[6] 罗哲贤.植被覆盖度对干旱气候影响的数值试验.地理研究,1985,4(2):1～9.
[7] Roelerk M,Maarten C B,Frank V L,Reinier H illeR isLambers. Self-organization of vegetation in arid ecosystem s1 The American Naturalist,2002,160(4):524～530.
[8] B rom ley J B rouwer,Barker A P,Gaze S R,et a l. The role of surface water distribution in an area of patterned vegetationin a sem i-arid environment,south-west N iger1 Journal of Hydrolodry,1997,198:1～29.
[9] Klausmeier C D. Regular and irregular patterns in sem iarid vegetation1 Science(W ashington D.C.),1999,284:1826～18281
[10] Kelly R D,Jose M F. The impact of a novel invasive species,O rbea va riega ta(African carrion flower),on the chenopodshrublands of South Australia.Journal of A rid Environments,1999,41:37～48.
[11] Congbin Fu1 Potential impacts of human-induced land cover change on East A sia monsoon1 Global and Planetary Change,2003,37:219～229.
[12] Pratap N,Singh R K,Sindhwal N S,et a l. W ater balance and water use efficiency of different land uses in western H imalayan valley region. AgriculturalW aterManagement,1998,37:225～240.
[13] W eaver J E,Zink E. Length of life of roots of ten species of perennial range and pasture grasses. Plant physiology,1945,21:201～217.
[14] W iggans C C. The effect of orchard p lants on subsoil moisture1 Proceedings of American Society of Horticultural Science,1936,33:103～107.
[15] Proebsting EL. Root distribution of some deciduous fruit trees in a California orchard1 Proceedings of American Society ofHorticultural Science,1943,43:1～4.
[16] Sommer R,Denich M,V lek P L G. Carbon storage and root penetration in deep soils under small-farmer and2use system sin the Eastern Amazon Region. B razil Plant Soil,2000,219:231～241.
[17] W hite D A,Dunin F X,Turner N C,et al1 W ater use by contour-p lanted belts of trees comp rised of four Eucalyp tus species. AgriculturalW aterManagement,2002,53(1～3):133～152.
[18] Latta R A,Cocks P S,Matthews C1 Lucerne pastures to sustain agricultural p roduction in southwestern Australia1 Agricultural W ater Management,2002,53(1～3):99～109.
[19] Rolf Sommer,Horst Folster,Konrad V ielhauer,et al1 Deep soil water dynam ics and dep letion by secondary vegetation inthe Eastern Amazon. Soil Science Society of America Journal,2003,67(6):1672～1689.
[20] Gyenge J E,FernaandezM E,Schlichter TM1 W ater relations of ponderosa p ines in Patagonia A rgentina:imp lications forlocal water resources and individual growth1 Trees-structure and Function,2003,17(5):417～423.
[21] 王志强,刘宝元,路炳军.黄土高原半干旱区土壤干层水分恢复研究,生态学保,2003,23(9):1944～1950.
[22] Timbal B,Power S,Colman R,et a l. Does soil moisture influence climate variability and p redictability over Australia?Journal of Climate,2002,15(10):1230～1238.
[23] 穆兴民,陈霁伟.黄土高原水土保持措施对土壤水分的影响.土壤侵蚀与水土保持学报,1999,5(4):39～44.
[24] 杨文治,余存祖.区域治理与评价.北京:科学出版社,1992. 241～243.
[25] 王国梁,刘国彬,常兴欣,等.黄土丘陵区小流域植被建设的土壤水文效应.自然资源学报,2002,17(3):339～334.
[26] 王志强,刘宝元,徐春达,付金生.连续干旱条件下黄土高原几种人工林存活能力分析.水土保持学报,2002,16(4):25～29.
[27] 侯庆春,韩蕊莲,李宏平.关于黄土丘陵典型地区植被建设中有关问题的研究———Ⅲ.乡土树种在造林中的意义.水土保持研究,2000,7(2):119～123.
[28] 梁一民.从植物群落学原理谈黄土高原植被建造中的几个问题.西北植物学报,1999,19(5):26～31.
[29] 中国科学院植物研究所.中国主要植物图说(豆科).北京:科学出版社,1955. 320～356.
[30] 李玉山1黄土区土壤水分循环特征及其对陆地水分循环的影响.生态学报,1983,3(2):91～101.
[31] 刘光崧,蒋能慧,张连第,刘赵礼,等.土壤理化性质分析与剖面描述.北京:中国标准出版社,1996.121～122.
[32] 刘东生,等.黄土与环境.北京:科学出版社,19851 191～400.
[33] 中国土壤学会编.土壤农业化学分析方法.北京:中国农业科技出版社,1999.107～108.
[34] 刘光崧,蒋能慧,等.土壤理化性质分析与剖面描述1北京:中国标准出版社,1996.5～7.
[35] 杨文治,劭明安.黄土高原土壤水分研究.北京:科学出版社,20001 49～115.
[36] 杨新民,杨文治.灌丛的水分平衡研究.水土保持研究,1998,5(1):109～118.
[37] 李细元,陈国良.人工草地土壤水系统动力学模型与过耗恢复预测.水土保持研究,1999,3(1):166～178.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |