评析西方城市土地利用的理论研究
收稿日期: 2000-04-12
修回日期: 2000-10-18
网络出版日期: 2001-02-15
基金资助
中国科学院知识创新工程项目(KZCX2-310-01-05);国家自然科学基金资助项目(40071030);中国科学院知识创新工程项
A critical review on the progress of urban land use theories in the West
Received date: 2000-04-12
Revised date: 2000-10-18
Online published: 2001-02-15
刘盛和, 吴传钧, 陈田 . 评析西方城市土地利用的理论研究[J]. 地理研究, 2001 , 20(1) : 111 -119 . DOI: 10.11821/yj2001010016
This paper carries out a systematical literature survey and critical review on the research progress of urban land use theories in the West, which are classified into historical morphological, locational economics, social behavior, and political economics by their research approaches. The historical morphological approach is good at exploring the spatial differentiation laws and the evolutionary models of urban land use, but its simple circular models are inconsistent with actual situation. The locational economics approach provides strong quantified economic explanation on the spatial structure of urban land use through deep decomposing the price components of urban land, but it pays more attention to “why” than to “what”. The behavior analysis approach becomes more comprehensive and practical because it additionally takes social driving forces into account, but it is based on the two concepts of “uncertainty” and “stochastity” of individual decision makers of land use, thus its theoretical explanation power is rather limited. The political economics approach focuses on the impact of the social production system and “power” on the process of urban land development, and greatly extends and enhances our understanding on inner dynamic mechanics of urban land development. Finally, this paper emphasizes that China should adopt and strengthen the application of locational economics and political economics approaches in its researches on urban land use in the future.
Key words： urban land use theory; research approach; the West
[1] Chap in F S,Kaiser E J.U rban L and U se P lann ing
[M].3rd ed.,U n iversity of Illino is P ress,1967.20.
[2] Bardo J W,H artm an J J.U rban Socio logy:a System atic In troduction
[M].Peacock,1982.
[3] Goodall B.T he Econom ics of U rban A reas
[M].N ew Yo rk:Pergam on P ress,1972.368.
[4] D ip asquale D.U rban Econom ics and R eal E state M arkets
[M].P ren tice2H all,1996.
[5] So low R M.Congestion co st and the u se of land fo r streets
[J].B ell J ou rna l of E conom ics and M anag em en t S ciences,1973,4.
[6] Koopm an s T C,Beckm an M J.“A ssignm en t P rob lem s and the L ocation of Econom ic A ctivities”
[J].E conom etrica,1957,25.
[7] M an Cho.Congestion effects of sp atial g row th restriction s:a m odel and em p irical analysis
[J].R ea l E sta te E conom ics,1997,25(3):409～438.
[8] Ro sen thal S S,H elsley R W.R edevelopm en t and the u rban land p rice g rad ien t
[J].J ou rna l of U rban E conom ics,1994,35:182～200.
[9] Capozza D,Yum ing L .iT he in ten sity and tim ing of investm en t:the case of land
[J].T he A m erican E conom ic R ev iew,1994,84(4).
[10] Fu jita M.U rban L and U se T heo ry
[A].In:Gab szew icz J J et al.L ocation T heo ry
[M].H arw ood A cadem ic Pub lishers,1985.74.
[11] Capozza D,H elsley R W.T he fundam en tals of land p rices and u rban g row th
[J].J ou rna l of U rban E conom ics,1989,26:295～306.
[12] W heaton W C.U rban residen tial g row th under p erfect fo resigh t
[J].J ou rna l of U rban E conom ics,1982,12:1～21.
[13] W ebber M M.T he U rban P lace and the N onp lace u rban R ealm
[A].In:W ebber(ed.).Exp lo ration s in to U rban Structu re,Ph iladelp h ia
[M].U n iversity of Ph iladelp h ia P ress,1964.79～153.
[14] Young K.U rban Po litics:A n O verview
[A].In:Young(ed.).E ssay on the Study of U rban Po ltics
[M].L ondon:M acm illan,1975.87.
[15] Sco tt A J.T he U rban L and N exu s and the State
[M].L ondon:P ion L im ited,1980.23.
[16] H arvey D.C lass M onopo ly R en t,F inance Cap itals and the U rban R evo lu tion
[J].R eg iona l S tud ies,1974,8:239～255.
[17] H arvey D.T he U rban P rocess under Cap italism
[J].In terna tiona l J ou rna l of U rban and R eg iona l R esea rch,1978,2(1):101～131.
[18] Fo rm W H.T he P lace of Social Structu re in the D eterm ination of L and U se
[J].S ocia l F orces,1954,32:317～323.
[19] Cox K R.L ocational A pp roaches to Pow er and Conflict
[M],N ew Yo rk:John W iley,1974.
[20] W illiam s O P.U rban Po litics and U rban Eco logy
[A].In:Young(ed.).E ssay on the Study of U rban Po ltics
[M].L ondon:M acm illan,1975.
[21] Pah l R E.W ho se C ity
[M].2ed.,H arm ond sw o rth:Pengu in,1975.
[22] John ston R J.U rban R esiden tial Pattern s
[M].L ondon:G.Belland Son s L td.1971.
[23] Pearson T D.L ocation!L ocation!L ocation!W hat is L ocation?
[J].T he A pp ra isa l J ou rna l,1991(1):7～19.
[24] 柴彦威.以单位为基础的中国城市内部生活空间结构
[J].地理研究,1996,15(1).
[25] 王宝铭.对城市工业用地收益区位差异规律的探讨——以天津市为例
[J].地理学报,1995,50(5):439～446.
[26] 杜德斌.影响上海地价空间分布的区位因子分析
[J].地理学报,1997,52(5).
[27] 刘盛和,吴传钧等.基于G IS的北京城市土地利用扩展模式
[J].地理学报,2000,55(4):408～416.
[28] 武进.城市形态:结构、特征及增长
[M].江苏科技出版社,1990.
[29] 许学强,胡华颖.广州市城市社会空间结构的因子生态分析
[J].地理学报,1989,44(4):385～399.
[30] 宗跃光.大都市空间扩展的廊道效应与景观结构优化——以北京市区为例
[J].地理研究,1998(2).
[31] 顾朝林等.北京社会极化与空间分异研究
[J].地理学报,1997,52(5).
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |