唐至北宋黄河下游水患加剧的人文背景分析
收稿日期: 2003-06-02
修回日期: 2003-10-21
网络出版日期: 2004-06-15
基金资助
山西省青年科学基金资助项目(20031054)
Factors for intensified flood in the lower Yellow River from the Tang Dynasty to Northern Song Dynasty
Received date: 2003-06-02
Revised date: 2003-10-21
Online published: 2004-06-15
王尚义, 任世芳 . 唐至北宋黄河下游水患加剧的人文背景分析[J]. 地理研究, 2004 , 23(3) : 385 -394 . DOI: 10.11821/yj2004030012
With the application of five year slide average of flood frequency analytical methods, the authors analyse the developing process of the Yellow River in the course of 510 years from the Tang Dynasty (TD), Five Dynasties (FV) to the Northern Song Dynasty (NSD), and explores several major flood afflicted consequences from TD to NSD It is found out a comparatively slight flood occurred at the beginning of TD, whereas severe floods occurred in the middle and late TD. Up till FV and NSD,the Yellow River was breached almost every year, the worst case with a couple of breaches in a year, and the most disastrous flood claimed a casualty of nearly one million people, unprecedented in the Yellow River flood disaster history The analyses and comparisons of the agricultural population migration in the middle Yellow River and from Hekouzhen to Longmen section from Eastern and Western Han dynasties, TD to NSD indicate that the ups and downs of the agricultural population in the middle reaches does not synchronize with flood frequency alteration in the lower reaches The evidence shows the flood of the lower reaches in TD was much slighter than that of Eastern Han, however the population in the middle reaches quadrupled that of EHD at that time Furthermore, population in the middle reaches in mid TD surpassed that of WHD and late NSD as well However, there was a relatively quiet time in the lower reaches in mid TD In accordance with the aforementioned, it can conclude that the local population growth did not contribute to the severe flood disasters in NSD The essay also investigates the conditions of land resources in the middle reaches and from Hekouzhen to Longmen section and concludes that the basin area and the valley plain could already fully satisfy the farming capacity, as a rule, it was unnecessary to open up the available slopes Thus farming activities can not be accountable for the severity of the flood disaster in the lower Yellow River After late TD, Dang Xiang ethnic group expanded their range of activity by establishing the feudal separatist regime in the whole Ordos Plateau and northern Shaanxi of the Loess Plateau and Xia Kingdom later in NSD, which featured the traditional grazing practice of nomadic nationality in this area accounting chiefly for soil desertification and flood disasters in the lower Yellow River
[1] 岑仲勉.黄河变迁史.北京:人民出版社,1957.
[2] 谭其骧.何以黄河在东汉以后会出现一个长期安流的局面.学术月刊,1962,6(2):23~35.
[3] 水利部黄河水利委员会.黄河水利史述要.北京:水利出版社,1984.116~138.
[4] 姚汉源.中国水利史纲要.北京:水利电力出版社,1987.145~161.
[5] 杨国顺。东汉黄河下游河道研究.见:左大康主编.黄河流域环境演变与水沙运行规律研究文集,第一集.北京:地质出版社,1991.27~32.
[6] 叶青超,尤联元,许炯心,等.黄河下游地上河发展趋势与环境后效.郑州:黄河水利出版社,1997.26~27.
[7] 王尚义.两汉时期黄河水患与中游土地利用之关系.地理学报,2003,58(1):73~82.
[8] 陈家其.黄河中游近1500年水旱变化规律及其趋势分析.人民黄河,1983,5(5).
[9] 王尚义.太原盆地昭余古湖的变迁及湮塞1地理学报,1997,52(3):262~267.
[10] 王尚义,董靖保.统万城的兴废与毛乌素沙地之变迁.地理研究,2001,20(3):247~353.
[11] 赵淑贞,任世芳,任伯平.试论公元前500年至公元534年间黄河下游洪患.人民黄河,2001,23(3):43~44.
[12] 胡一三主编.黄河防洪.郑州:黄河水利出版社,1997.438~447.
[13] 陈先德主编.黄河水文.郑州:黄河水利出版社,1996.74.
[14] 吴祥定,钮仲勋,王守春,等.历史时期黄河流域环境变迁与水沙变化.北京:气象出版社,1994.45~57.
[15] 葛剑雄主编.中国人口史·第一卷.上海:复旦大学出版社,2002.313~327.
[16] 梁方仲编著.中国历代户口、田地、田赋统计.上海:上海人民出版社,1980.
[17] 赵文林,谢淑君.中国人口史.北京:人民出版社,1988 167~73.
[18] 赵存兴.中国黄土高原地区耕地坡度分级数据库集1北京:海洋出版社,1990.
[19] 景可,陈永宗,李风新.黄河泥沙与环境.北京:科学出版社,1993
[20] 吴慧.中国历代粮食亩产研究.北京:农业出版社,1985.
[21] 韩国磐.隋唐五代史纲.北京:人民出版社,1977.155~166.
[22] 王万忠,焦菊英.黄土高原侵蚀产沙强度的时空变化特征.地理学报,2002,57(2):210~217.
[23] 赵淑贞,任世芳,苏志珠.历史时期晋西北地区人类活动与农牧变迁研究.水土保持研究,2002,9(3):30~33.
[24] 张维邦主编.山西省经济地理.北京:新华出版社,1987.
[25] 谭其骧主编.中国历史地图集,第五册,隋、唐、五代十国时期.北京:中国地图出版社,19821图40~41.
[26] 谭其骧主编.中国历史地图集,第六册,宋、辽、金时期.北京:中国地图出版社,1982.图16~17.
[27] 王建革.畜群结构与近代蒙古族游牧经济.中国农史,2002,20(2):47~61.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |