中国南方传统聚落景观区划及其利用价值
收稿日期: 2005-11-17
修回日期: 2006-03-10
网络出版日期: 2006-06-15
基金资助
国家自然科学基金项目(40171022);教育部人文社科“十五”规划项目(03JD790025);湖南省教育厅重点科技项目(03A008)资助
Landscape communities of traditional settlement in southern China and their values of conservation and utilization
Received date: 2005-11-17
Revised date: 2006-03-10
Online published: 2006-06-15
聚落文化景观是文化景观研究的最有效的切入点。由于中国南方地区较为多样化的地理环境和文化背景,传统聚落景观的多样化特点比北方地区表现得更为鲜明。不同地方环境与文化背景下的南方传统聚落景观,表现出较为明显的地域分异和景观意象差异,从而划分出识别性较强的8个聚落景观区和40个景观亚区。8个聚落景观区为:Ⅰ.江浙水乡聚落景观区;Ⅱ.皖赣徽商聚落景观区;Ⅲ.闽粤赣边客家聚落景观区;Ⅳ.浙南闽台沿海丘陵聚落景观区;Ⅴ.岭南广府聚落景观区;Ⅵ.湘鄂赣平原山地聚落景观区;Ⅶ.云贵高原及桂西北多民族聚落景观区;Ⅷ.四川盆地及周边巴蜀聚落景观区。南方传统聚落景观区的保护与利用价值主要表现在其独特的遗产价值、科学价值、美学价值及旅游价值。
申秀英, 刘沛林, 邓运员, 王良健 . 中国南方传统聚落景观区划及其利用价值[J]. 地理研究, 2006 , 25(3) : 485 -494 . DOI: 10.11821/yj2006030014
The cultural landscape of settlement is the most effective approach to the cultural landscape studies.Owing to the factors of its geographical location,local culture and architectural materials and methods,the traditional settlement landscape in southern China has presented many rich characteristics of cultural diversity in regions,and a variety of communities in the settlement landscape has taken shape.These communities of settlement landscape are significant when taking the conservation and the utilization values into consideration. This article presents the following viewpoints: (1)Being settlement landscape resulting from an integration of human activity and the natural landscape,human settlements and architectural styles appear to be most sustainable,symbolic and representative.Therefore,taking the settlement landscape as a point of contact for cultural landscape studies still remains as an important approach and content of study of cultural geagraphy. (2) Starting from a social-psychological concept of "Image",the authors are trying to explore the structure and the features of the traditional settlement landscapes in southern China.A new form of cultural landscape analysis and exhibition will be represented,which provides a fresh perspective for the studies of traditional cultural landscape. (3) The leading factor of Landscape Identity is architectural feature when dividing settlement landscape communities,i.e.zones of settlement landscape.The second is the local cultural factor,and local building materials and methods follow.The architecture features reflect a combination of these factors. (4) This article proposes to divide the traditional settlement landscape in southern China into eight basic communities(i.e.landscape zones),regarding the internal similarity of landscape "Image" as a precondition,and the relative consistency characteristics as the primary distinction.The architectural landscape demonstrates strong features such as "visibility "and "imageability". (5) Multiple values of conservation and utilization lie in the communities of traditional settlement landscape in southern China.The main values include heritage value,scientific value,aesthetical value and "destination" value,which have received greater and greater social attention.
[1] Sauer C O. T he morph ol ogy of lands cap e. Uni versit y of Cal iforni a Pu blicat ion in Geog raphy,1925,(2):19~54.
[2] Whit t lesey D S. Sequent occupan cy. Annals of t he As sociat ion of Am erican Geographers,1929,(19):162~165.
[3] 汤茂林.文化景观的内涵及其研究进展.地理科学进展,2000,19(1):70~79.
[4] 赵荣.论文化景观的判识及其研究.西北大学学报(自然科学版),1995,(6):723~726.
[5] 角媛梅,程国栋,肖笃宁.哈尼梯田文化景观及其保护研究.地理研究,2002,21(6):733~741.
[6] 黄成林.徽州文化景观初步研究1地理研究,2000,19(3):257~263
[7] 方淑波,肖笃宁,迟守乾.全球化背景下城市的文化景观设计浅议.以兰州市为例.世界地理研究,2003,(3):59~66.
[8] 肖笃宁,高峻,等.景观生态学在城市规划和管理中的应用.地球科学进展,2001,(12):813~820.
[9] 李团胜.景观生态学中的文化研究.生态学杂志,1997,(2):78~80.
[10] 王仰麟.渭南地区景观生态规划与设计.自然资源学报,1995,10(4):372~379.
[11]
[法]皮尔曼.人文地理学.北京:商务印书馆,1993. 66~73.
[12] 彭一刚.传统村镇聚落景观分析.北京:中国建筑工业出版社,1994.
[13] 陆林,凌善金,等.徽州古村落的演化过程及机理.地理研究,2004,23(5):686~694.
[14] 卢松,陆林,等.古村落旅游地旅游环境容量初探.地理研究,2005,24(7):581~590.
[15] 江金波,司徒尚纪.梅州市名城文化景观的保护与开发研究.热带地理,2002,(4):335~340.
[16] 刘丽川.深圳客家宗族派衍与传统村落拓展.以龙岗坑梓黄氏为例.汕头大学学报(人文社会科学版),2002,(3):101~107.
[17] 刘沛林.古村落:和谐的人聚空间.上海:上海三联书店,1995. 82~185.
[18] 刘沛林,董双双.中国古村落景观的空间意象研究.地理研究,1998,17(1):31~38.
[19] 于希贤.复兴中国传统地理的硕果.评5古村落:和谐的人聚空间6.地理科学进展,1998,17(2):97~98.
[20] Kevin L ynch. T he Image of Th e City. M as sachuset t s:Th e Mas sachus et t s In st itu te T echnology Press,1960. 1~13.
[21] 凯文.林奇.城市印象.项秉仁译.北京:中国建筑工业出版社,1990. 1~11.
[22] A.赫特纳.地理学,它的历史、性质和方法.北京:商务印书馆,1986. 243
[23] 鲁西奇.历史地理研究中的/区域0问题.武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版),1996,(6):81~86.
[24] B.C.热库林.历史地理学.对象与方法.韩光辉译.北京:北京大学出版社,1992. 90.
[25] 蓝勇.对中国历史文化地理研究的思考.学术研究,2002,(1):87~90.
[26] 周振鹤.中国历史文化区域研究序论.上海:复旦大学出版社,1997. 1~3.
[27] 李旭旦.人文地理学.上海:中国大百科全书出版社,1984. 223~224.
[28] 王恩涌,等.文化地理学.北京:高等教育出版社,2001. 3~18.
[29] 刘沛林.古村落文化景观的基因表达与景观识别1衡阳师范学院学报,2003,(4):1~8.
[30] 冯天瑜.中国文化的地域性展开.江汉论坛,2002,(1):5~6.
[31] 周振鹤1中国历史上自然区域、行政区划与文化区域相互关系管窥1历史地理(第十九辑),上海:上海人民出版社,2003. 1~8.
[32] 陶伟.中国/世界遗产0的可持续旅游发展研究.北京:中国旅游出版社,2001. 7.
[33] 张成渝.真实性0和/完整性0是遗产保护的基本原则.见:徐嵩龄,张晓明,章建刚主编1文化遗产的保护与经营)))中国实践与理论进展.北京:社会科学文献出版社,2003. 85.
[34] 张松.历史城市保护学导论.文化遗产和历史环境保护的一种整体性方法.上海:上海科学技术出版社,2001. 246.
[35] 刘沛林.论/中国历史文化名村0保护制度的建立.北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版),1998,(1):81~88.
[36] 汪昱仁,刘惠国.农村旅游地审美环境营造之探讨.(台湾)真理观光学报,2003,(1):23~38.
[37] 刘沛林,申秀英.中国古村落旅游的现状、问题及其未来策略.(台湾)真理观光学报,2004,(2):37~58.
[38] Willis K G,Benson J F. Recreat ional valu es of forest s. Forest ry,1999,62(2):93~109.
[39] L oomi s J B,Wal sh R G. R ecreat ion Econ om ic Decisions:Comparing Benefit s and Cost s(2nd). Vent ure Publi sh-ing Inc.,1997.
[40] 徐中民,等.额济纳旗生态系统恢复的总经济价值评估.地理学报,2002,57(1):107~116.
[41] 李秀清,李宏松.三峡工程淹没区文物古迹的价值评估(一).长江流域资源与环境,1998,(2):132~138.
[42] 张志强,徐中民,程国栋.条件价值评估法的发展与应用.地球科学进展,2003,18(3):444~463.
[43] 许抄军.历史文化名城的游憩价值评估.以湘西凤凰古城为例.经济地理,2005,(1):68~72.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |