论文

山区资源型大城市社区分类特征与影响因素——以广东省韶关市为例

展开
  • 1. 中山大学城市与区域研究中心,广州510275;
    2. 深圳市新城市规划建筑设计有限公司,深圳518172
薛德升(1969-),男,山西祁县人,博士,副教授,硕士研究生导师。从事城市地理学、工业地理学、 城市与区域规划等方面的研究。E-mail:eesxds@zsu.edu.cn

收稿日期: 2005-05-09

  修回日期: 2005-10-26

  网络出版日期: 2006-02-15

基金资助

国家自然科学基金面上项目“体制转型背景下中国城市内部社区发展与规划研究”(40471039)

Social areas of a resource-oriented large city in mountain area: classification,characteristics and influential factors—a case study of Shaoguan City,Guangdong Province

Expand
  • 1. Center for Urban and Regional Studies,Sun Yat-Sen University,Guangzhou 510275,China;
    2. Limited Company of New Urban Planning and Architecture Design,Shenzhen 518172,China

Received date: 2005-05-09

  Revised date: 2005-10-26

  Online published: 2006-02-15

摘要

利用第五次人口普查数据,运用生态因子分析方法,通过对广东省韶关市典型案例分析,对我国山区资源型大城市的社会区分类、特征与影响因素进行了研究。发现具有这种规模、功能和区位特征城市的社会区可划分为7类,其中5类社会区及其在城市中的空间分布与北京、上海、广州等综合性特大中心城市具有相似之处;而另2类则反映出山区资源型城市的不同特征。影响这类城市社会区形成的因素主要有4个方面,其中科技文化水平和建设时序两个因素与综合性特大中心城市相似;但就业结构对山区资源型城市的影响比中心城市的影响要大得多,年龄结构、性别比结构、人口迁入迁出比重等人口和家庭特征因素在这类城市中具有突出的影响。

本文引用格式

薛德升, 曹小曙, 曹丰林 . 山区资源型大城市社区分类特征与影响因素——以广东省韶关市为例[J]. 地理研究, 2006 , 25(1) : 141 -150 . DOI: 10.11821/yj2006010017

Abstract

The research about urban social area and social spatial structure started in the mid 1980s in China.Since then most of the studies about urban social area have been focused upon the super-large central cities with comprehensive urban functions such as Beijing,Shanghai,Guangzhou and Xian.Few similar researches have been done in the other kind of cities.This paper chose Shaoguan City in Guangdong Province as a case study,which is characterized by large size,locating in mountain area,and taking mineral resources developing and processing industries as its dominant function.In the study,19 spatial statistical units based on the fifth national census were divided,data of 11 categories and 75 variables for each spatial unit were used,and the method of ecological factorial analysis was adopted.The main conclusions are: there are seven categories of social areas in Shaoguan City,including old urban area with high population density and comprehensive functions,high class residential area,mixed residential area in urban fringe,scattered residential area of agricultural population,moving-in residential area of middle income households,residential area of state-owned enterprises,residential area of old population,etc.The main features and spatial locations of the first five categories within these seven social areas are very similar to those in the super-large central cities with comprehensive urban functions,while the last two are different,which reflect the special feature of Shaoguan and its similar cities. Four main factors,including occupation structure and socio-economic status, scientific and cultural level,urban developing history and constructing order, and family feature,played the most important roles in the course of the formation and change of Shaoguan's urban social areas.Within which the scientific and cultural level,and the urban developing history and constructing order are very similar to those in the super-large central cities with comprehensive functions,while the other two are different,i.e.,the occupation structure played much more important role in the cities like Shaoguan than those like Beijing,Shanghai and Guangzhou;and some family and demographic features like age,sex proportion,proportion of migrants,were not playing as important roles in the super-large central cities with comprehensive functions as in a city like Shaoguan characterizing by large size,locating in mountain area,with mineral resources developing and processing industries as dominant function.

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

参考文献


[1]  许学强,周一星,宁越敏.城市地理学.北京:高等教育出版社,1996. 207.

[2]  Johnson R J,Gregory D,Smit h D M. The Dictionary of Human Geograp hy(t hird edition)1 Oxford:Blackwell,1994. 558.

[3]  Shevky E,Williams M. The Social Areas of Los Angeles. Los Angeles:Universit y of California Press Press,1949.

[4]  Shevky E,Bell W. Social Area Analysis1 Stanford,CA:Stanford Universit y Press,1955.

[5]  Knox P. Urban Social Geograp hy:An Int roduction(4thedn.). England:Pearson Education Limited,2000.

[6]  Le Bourdais C. The Changing Residential St ruct ure of Mont real #197.-8.. Canadian Geograp her,.988,32:98~113.

[7]  Davies W,Herbert D. Communities wit hin Cities:An Urban Geograp hy. London:Belhaven Press,1993.

[8]  Lo C P. Change in t he Ecological St ruct ure of Hong Kong #196.-.97.:A Co mparative Analysis,Environmentand Planning A.,.975,7:94.~963.

[9]  Berry B J L,Ress P H. The Facorial Ecology of Calcutta. American Journal of Sociology,1969,74:445~491.

[10]  Abu2L ughod J. Testing t he Theory of Social Area Analysis:t he Ecology of Cairo,Egypt. American SociologicalReview,1969,34:198~212.

[11]  虞蔚.城市社会空间结构的研究与规划.城市规划,1986,10(6):25~28.

[12]  许学强,胡华颖,叶嘉安.广州市社会空间结构的因子生态分析.地理学报,1989,44(4):385~396.

[13]  郑静,许学强,陈浩光.广州市社会空间的因子生态再分析.地理研究,1995,14(2):15~25.

[14]  王兴中.中国城市社会空间结构研究.北京:科学出版社,2000.

[15]  刘贵利1北京城市社会区的变迁.人文地理,2003,18(3):28~31.

[16]  顾朝林,王法辉,刘贵利.北京城市社会区分析.地理学报,2003,58(6):917~926.

[17]  冯建,周一星.北京都市区社会空间结构及其演化(1982-2000).地理研究,2003(4):465~483.

[18]  张文忠,刘旺,李业锦.北京城市内部居住空间分布与居民居住区位偏好.地理研究,2003,22(6):751~759.

[19]  柴彦威,胡智勇,仵宗卿.天津城市内部人口迁居特征及其机制分析.地理研究,2000,19(4):392~399.

[20]  Kesteloot C. Three Levels of Socio2spatial Polarization in Brussels. Built Environment,1995,20(3):207~217.

[21]  Hart schorn T A. Interpreting t he Cit y:An U rban Geograp hy. New York:John Wiley,1992.

[22]  Ress P1 Concept s of Social Space:toward an urban social geograp hy1 NJ:Prentice Hall,1970.

[23]  Kempen E T. The Dual Cit y and t he Poor:Social Polarization,Social Segregation and Life Chances. Urban St ud-ies,.994,3.(7):995~.0.5.

文章导航

/