环境与生态

中国工业废水达标排放的区域差异与收敛分析

展开
  • 1. 中国科学院区域可持续发展分析与模拟重点实验室,北京100101;
    2. 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所,北京100101;
    3. 中国科学院研究生院,北京100049
唐志鹏(1978-), 男, 助理研究员, 博士, 主要从事区域经济与区域可持续发展分析与模拟等研究。 E-mail: tangzhipeng@amss.ac.cn

收稿日期: 2010-08-20

  修回日期: 2010-11-29

  网络出版日期: 2011-06-20

基金资助

国家科技基础性工作专项课题(2007FY140800-2); 国家自然科学基金项目(70871108 )

Regional difference and convergence of standardized discharge of industrial waste water in China

Expand
  • 1. Key Laboratory of Regional Sustainable Development Modeling, CAS, Beijing 100101, China;
    2. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China;
    3. Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Received date: 2010-08-20

  Revised date: 2010-11-29

  Online published: 2011-06-20

摘要

水体中污染物主要来自人们的生产和生活活动。工业发展所排放的大量工业废水不仅影响着人们的饮水安全,也给生态环境带来一定程度的破坏。本文以工业废水排放达标率为着眼点,对1998~2008年我国八大区域工业废水达标排放的区域差异进行了σ收敛和β收敛分析。研究表明,中国区域间工业废水达标排放的总体差异没有呈现出显著的σ收敛。从各区域的时间差异来看,西南区域的差异最大,东部沿海区域的差异最小。通过绝对β收敛和条件β收敛模型验证发现,中国区域间工业废水达标排放的总体差异正在缩小,各区域的初始水平是影响收敛的关键因素,工业增加值的年增长率也起到一定程度的作用。

本文引用格式

唐志鹏, 刘卫东, 刘志高, 王蓓 . 中国工业废水达标排放的区域差异与收敛分析[J]. 地理研究, 2011 , 30(6) : 1101 -1109 . DOI: 10.11821/yj2011060013

Abstract

Water resource is a necessity of life for us. Water pollution is an important restriction factor in the process of China's sustainable development. Water pollutants are mainly from our production and living including industrial waste water, domestic sewage and agricultural waste water. China has reduced discharge of waste water and has strived to protect water environment in recent years, but industrial waste water is still a major source of water pollutants. And with more and more industrial enterprises' establishment and development in China, a large amount of the discharge of industrial waste water can do great damage to the water environment and pose a serious threat to the safety of drinking water because industrial waste water contains large quantities of heavy metal ions. So on the one hand we should know the regional difference of standardized discharge of industrial waste water among these regions including temporal difference in each region and spatial difference in each year, on the other hand we must know whether the regional difference is becoming larger in order to make the relevant policies on water protection. Based on the attainment rate of industrial waste water standardized discharge, this paper examines regional difference of standardized discharge of China's industrial waste water among eight regions through σ convergence and β convergence during the period 1998—2008. The results show that there is no significant σ convergence about regional difference of standardized discharge of industrial waste water in China's eight regions during the same period. From the aspect of the time we can see that the spatial difference is not always becoming small in each year, although the trend is becoming small. As far as the temporal difference of China's eight regions is concerned, the in regional difference Southwest China is the largest among eight regions, while eastern coastal region presents the smallest difference. The model of absolute β convergence and conditional β convergence shows that the overall regional difference of standardized discharge of industrial waste water in China is becoming small, initial conditions in each region are critical factors narrowing the differences, and annual growth rate of industrial value-added plays a role as well. Thus these results could help to provide suggestions to policies making for water protection.

参考文献

[1] Baumol W J. Productivity growth, convergence and welfare: What the long-run data show.American Economic Review,1986,76(5):1072~1085.

[2] Barro R J. Economic growth in a cross-section of countries. Quarterly Journal of Economics,1991,106(2): 407~443.

[3] Barro R J,Sala-i-Martin X. Convergence.Journal of Political Economy,1992,100: 223~251.

[4] Barro R J,Sala-i-Martin X. Economic Growth. New York: McGraw Hill.1995.

[5] Islam N. Growth empirics: A panel data approach.Quarterly Journal of Economics,1995,110(4): 1127~1170.

[6] 刘夏明,魏英琪,李国平. 收敛还是发散?——中国区域经济发展争论的文献综述,经济研究,2004,(7): 70~81.

[7] 陈安平,李国平. 中国地区经济增长的收敛性:时间序列的经验研究.数量经济技术经济研究,2004,(11): 31~35.

[8] 许昭元,李善同. 近年来中国地区差距的变化趋势.经济研究,2006,(7): 106~116.

[9] 张健,何彬. 中国地区收入差距趋于收敛还是发散?学习与探索,2007,(3): 153~155.

[10] Islam N. Productivity dynamics in a large sample of countries: A panel study.Review of Income and Wealth, 2003,49(2):247~272.

[11] 彭国华. 中国地区收入差距、全要素生产率及其收敛分析.经济研究,2005,(9): 19~29.

[12] 鄂永健.中国地区间价格水平差距趋于收敛还是发散——基于省级面板数据的单位根检验. 经济评论,2007,(5): 113~117.

[13] Miketa A,Mulder P. Energy productivity across developed and developing countries in 10 manufacturing sectors:Patterns of growth and convergence.Energy Economics,2005,27(3): 429~453.

[14] 杨正林,方齐云. 能源生产率差异与收敛:基于省际面板数据的实证分析.数量经济技术经济研究,2008,(9):17~30.

[15] 师博,张量悦. 我国区域能源效率收敛性分析.统计与决策,2008,(2):17~21.

[16] 李静,程丹润.中国区域环境效率差异及演进规律研究——基于非期望产出的SBM模型的分析.工业技术经济,2008,27(11):100~104.

[17] 周景博,陈妍.中国区域环境效率分析. 统计与决策,2008,(14): 44~46.

[18] 杨俊,邵汉华,胡军. 中国环境效率评价及其影响因素实证研究.中国人口资源与环境,2010,20(2): 49~55.

[19] 王俊能,许振成,胡习邦,等. 基于DEA理论的中国区域环境效率分析.中国环境科学,2010,30(4): 565~570.

[20] 周静,杨桂山. 江苏省工业废水排放与经济增长的动态关系.地理研究,2007,26(5):931~939.

[21] 穆从如,王景华. 晋陕蒙接壤地区环境污染和环境保护目标.地理学报,1995,50(6):534~541.

[22] 林巧莺. 福州市水环境的问题与对策.福建地理,2003,18(3):20~22.

[23] 陈晓玲,李国平. 地区经济收敛实证研究方法评述.数量经济技术经济研究,2007,(8):151~160.

[24] Sala-i-Martin X. The classical approach to convergence analysis. Economic Journal, 1996, 106: 1019~1036.

[25] 李善同,侯永志. 中国大陆:划分8大社会经济区域.理论参考,2004,(7): 10~12.

[26] 尹晓波,李雪萍. 我国东中西部三地区环境与经济系统发展的协调度研究.经济地理,2009,29(4): 589~564.
文章导航

/