水文与水资源

灌溉管理方式的转变及其对作物用水影响的实证

展开
  • 1. 中国科学院农业政策研究中心,北京 100101;
    2. 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所,北京 100101
王金霞(1972-),女,内蒙古包头人,研究员,博士。主要从事水资源管理、制度与政策研究及气候变化研究。E-mail: jxwang.ccap@igsnrr.ac.cn

收稿日期: 2010-06-25

  修回日期: 2011-02-28

  网络出版日期: 2011-09-20

基金资助

国家自然科学基金(70733004, 70925001);科技部973计划(2010CB428406)。

Empirical research on the change of irrigation management patterns and its impacts on crop water use

Expand
  • 1. Center for Chinese Agricultural Policy, CAS, Beijing 100101, China;
    2. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China

Received date: 2010-06-25

  Revised date: 2011-02-28

  Online published: 2011-09-20

摘要

采用三年的面板数据实证研究了我国黄河流域灌区灌溉管理方式的转变及其对作物用水的影响。结果表明:2001年以后,黄河流域灌区灌溉管理改革的推进速度进一步加快,而且用水协会转变的速度超过承包管理,成为改革的主导方式。在一些村中,用水协会或承包管理也可能又返回到原来的集体管理。最后,定量分析结果显示,在用水协会转变初期,作物用水能显著减少;但是如果继续推行,节水的效果就不再显著。因而,如何建立长效的节水激励机制继续促进改革绩效的提高是政府部门应该关注的重要问题。

本文引用格式

王金霞, 邢相军, 张丽娟, 刘亚克 . 灌溉管理方式的转变及其对作物用水影响的实证[J]. 地理研究, 2011 , 30(9) : 1683 -1692 . DOI: 10.11821/yj2011090012

Abstract

Based on three years' panel data, this paper studies the change of irrigation management patterns and its impacts on crop water use in the irrigation districts of the Yellow River Basin. Research results show that in different periods, the change of irrigation management patterns presented varying characteristics. Generally, in the later periods of the reform (from 2004 to 2007), the Water User Associations (WUAs) accelerated its development, which is quicker than contracting management. However, in the earlier periods of the reform (before 2004), the development of contracting management was promoted more quickly. In addition, the change of irrigation management patterns was bidirectional. Even some villages implemented WUAs or contracting management, and they may be reverted to collective management. This indicates that not all the villages are suitable to adopt the patterns of WUAs and contracting management. Only in those villages in better conditions, such as better irrigation infrastructures, larger irrigated areas by surface water resources, larger cultivated areas and better complementary measures for supporting the reform by the local government, can the reform be sustained. Finally, the quantitative analysis shows that in the early periods of management change, crop water use can be significantly reduced. However, as the implementation of the reform goes on, the reduction of crop water use is not significant. Therefore, how to take measures for water saving and to improve the performance of irrigation management reform in a long term is what the local government should take into account. In future reforms, the government should place emphasis on the change of irrigation management patterns, as well as on the establishment of management mechanisms, such as water saving, so as to ensure the sustainability of the reform of irrigation management. Otherwise the reform will only take effect in the short run and the goal of sustainable utilization of water resources and socio-economy development is hard to realize.

参考文献

[1] 国家统计局. 中国统计年鉴. 北京: 国家统计局,2009.

[2] 水利部. 全国新增1000亿斤粮食生产能力规划水利专题研究报告. http://ghjh.mwr.gov.cn/zhyw/zwxx/200905/t20090508_21456.html,2009-05-08.

[3] 王铮,郑一萍. 全球变化对中国粮食安全的影响分析. 地理研究,2001,20(3): 282~289.

[4] 水利部和南京水利水电科学研究院. 21世纪地下水资源的开发和利用. 北京: 中国水利水电科学出版社,2004.

[5] 水利部. 中国水资源公报. 北京: 中国水利部,2009.

[6] 王金霞, 黄季焜, 徐志刚, 等. 灌溉、管理改革及其效应——黄河流域灌区的实证分析. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社,2005.

[7] 李代鑫. 中国灌溉管理与用水户参与灌溉管理. 中国农村水利水电, 2002, (5): 1~3.

[8] 汪恕诚. 推进可持续发展水利, 为构建和谐社会提供保障. http://www.hhsb.gov.cn/article/show.asp?id=2226,2007-01-10.

[9] Wang J, Xu Z, Huang J, et al. Incentives in water management reform: Assessing the effect on water use, productivity and poverty in the Yellow River Basin. Environment and Development Economics, 2005, 10(6): 769~799.

[10] 许志芳,张泽良. 各国用水户参与灌溉管理经验述评. 中国农村水利水电,2002, (6):10~15.

[11] 冯广志,谷丽雅. 印度和其他国家用水户参与灌溉管理的经验及其启示. 中国农村水利水电,2000, (4):23~26.

[12] Sergio A S, Pauln W. A farmer-centered analysis of irrigation management transfer in Mexico. Irrigation and Drainage Systems, 2004, 18(1): 89~107.

[13] Filiz D C, Patrick L, Heinz G. Agricultural and environmental changes after irrigation management transfer in the Develi Basin, Turkey. Irrig Drainage System, 2008, 22(1): 47~66.

[14] Kloezen W H, Garc s-Restrepo C, Johnson III S H. Impact Assessment of Irrigation Management Transfer in the Alto Rio Lerma. Research Report No 15, Colombo, Sri Lanka: International Irrigation Management Institute, 1997.

[15] 张陆彪, 刘静, 胡定寰. 农民用水者协会的绩效与问题. 农业经济问题, 2003, 24(2): 29~33.

[16] Wooldridge J M. 计量经济学导论: 现代观点.费剑平译. 北京:中国人民大学出版社, 2003.

[17] Wang.JXu Z, Huang J, et al. Incentives to managers and participation of farmers: Which matters for water management reform in China? Agricultural Economics, 2006, 34(3): 315~330.

[18] 徐志刚, 王金霞, 黄季焜, 等. 水资源管理制度改革、激励机制与用水效:黄河流域灌区农业用水管理制度改革的实证研究. 中国农业经济评论, 2004, 2(4): 415~426.

[19] 成诚, 王金霞. 灌溉管理改革的进展、特征及决定因素:黄河流域灌区的实证研究. 自然资源学报,2010, 25(7): 1079~1087.
文章导航

/