环境与生态

中亚热带红壤丘陵区松林生态系统表层土壤活性有机碳空间分异规律

展开
  • 1. 湖南大学环境科学与工程学院,长沙 410082;
    2. 环境生物与控制教育部重点实验室(湖南大学), 长沙 410082;
    3. 长沙理工大学土木与建筑学院,长沙 410076;
    4. 邵阳市水土保持研究所,邵阳 422002
陈晓琳(1986-),女,四川广安人。主要从事土壤侵蚀和土壤碳关系研究。 E-mail: xiaolin425@126.com

收稿日期: 2011-05-09

  修回日期: 2011-08-03

  网络出版日期: 2011-10-20

基金资助

国家自然科学基金项目(40971170);湖南省自然科学基金项目(11JJ3041);教育部新世纪人才项目(NCET-09-330)

Spatial distribution of topsoil labile organic carbon of Pinus elliottii ecosystem in the central subtropical region

Expand
  • 1. College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China;
    2. Key Laboratory of Environmental Biology and Pollution Control (Hunan University), Ministry of Education Changsha 410082, China;
    3. College of Civil Engineering and Architecture,
    Changsha University of Science and Technology, Changsha 410076, China;
    4. Soil and Water Conservation Research Institute of Shaoyang, Shaoyang 422002, China

Received date: 2011-05-09

  Revised date: 2011-08-03

  Online published: 2011-10-20

摘要

土壤活性有机碳在指示土壤碳库平衡、表征土壤肥力与质量、衡量土壤微生物生长等方面具有重要意义。本文对中亚热带红壤丘陵区松林生态系统93个表层(0~20cm)土壤样品的活性有机碳空间分布特征及其与地形、植被和土壤特性的关系进行了深入分析。结果表明:表层土壤活性有机碳的平均值为1.92g/kg,占土壤有机碳的29.18%,变异系数为46.15%。从不同地貌部位来看,沟道的活性有机碳含量、碳库活度均显著高于坡面。土壤活性有机碳与海拔、乔木地上生物量显著负相关,与灌木地上生物量显著正相关,与土壤有机碳、全氮、全磷、速效氮、有效磷和速效钾呈极显著正相关关系。利用Canoco进行主成分分析表明,第一、二轴可以算是主成分轴,第一轴中主要与土壤有机碳、全氮、速效氮的相关性较强,第二轴中则主要与海拔、pH、全磷、灌木地上生物量相关性较大。土壤碳库活度则与各影响因子的相关性均不显著。

本文引用格式

陈晓琳, 李忠武, 王晓燕, 申卫平, 张雪, 郭旺, 张越男 . 中亚热带红壤丘陵区松林生态系统表层土壤活性有机碳空间分异规律[J]. 地理研究, 2011 , 30(10) : 1825 -1834 . DOI: 10.11821/yj2011100009

Abstract

Labile organic carbon is more sensitive to changes in land management or environment conditions than stable carbon, although it is a smaller fraction of soil organic carbon. It also has a disproportionately large effect on nutrient-supplying capacity and the structural stability of soils. Therefore, the spatial distribution and its influencing factors (topography, vegetation and soil properties) have been analyzed in Pinus elliottii ecosystem of central subtropical region. Results indicated that the mean of soil labile organic carbon was 1.92g/kg, accounting for 29.12% of soil organic carbon, and the coefficient of variability was 46.15%. Labile organic carbon and carbon lability in gully areas were significantly higher than that in slope position. The results of correlation analysis showed that labile organic carbon was negatively correlated with elevation and aboveground biomass of arbor layer, positively correlated with aboveground biomass of shrubs, but highly significantly positive with soil organic carbon, total nitrogen, total phosphorus, available nitrogen, available phosphorus and available potassium. Principal component analysis in Canoco showed that the first and second axes were the principal component axes. Soil organic carbon, total nitrogen and available nitrogen were the first principal component axis affecting labile organic carbon, followed by altitude, pH, total phosphorus and above-ground biomass of shrubs. However, carbon lability had no significant correlation with affecting factors.

参考文献

[1] Chan K Y, Heenan D P, Oates A. Soil carbon fractions and relationship to soil quality under different tillage and stubble management. Soil & Tillage Research, 2002, 63: 133~139.

[2] Ishaq M, Ibrahim M, Lal R. Tillage effects on soil properties at different levels of fertilizer application in Punjab, Pakistan. Soil & Tillage Research, 2002, 68: 93~99.

[3] Johnston A E. Soil organic carbon, effects on soils and crops. Soil Use and Management, 1986, 2: 97~105.

[4] Reeves D W. The role of soil organic matter in maintaining soil quality in continuous cropping system. Soil &Tillage Research, 1997, 43: 131~167.

[5] 王立刚, 邱建军, 马永良, 等. 应用DNDC 模型分析施肥与翻耕方式对土壤有机碳含量的长期影响. 中国农业大学学报, 2004, 9(6): 15~19.

[6] Houghton R A. The contemporary carbon cycle. In: Schlesinger W H. Biogeochemistry. Oxford: Eisevier-Pergamon, 2005. 473~513.

[7] Lal R. Soil carbon sequestration impacts on global climate change and food security.Science, 2004, 304: 1623~1627.

[8] Murty D, Kirschbaum M F, Mcmurtrie R E, et al. Does conversion of forest to agricultural land change soli carbon and nitrogen? A review of the literature. Global Change Biology, 2002, 8: 105~123.

[9] 程先富, 史学正, 于东升, 等. 兴国县森林土壤有机碳库及其与环境因子的关系. 地理研究, 2004, 23(2): 211~217.

[10] 许信旺, 潘根兴, 曹志红, 等. 安徽省土壤有机碳空间差异及影响因素. 地理研究, 2007, 26 (6) :1077~1086.

[11] 徐明岗, 于荣, 王伯仁. 土壤活性有机质的研究进展. 土壤肥料, 2000,(6): 3~7.

[12] Blair G J, Lefroy R D B, Lisle L. Soil carbon fractions based on their degree of oxidation and the development of a carbon management index for agricultural systems. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 1995, 46: 1459~1466.

[13] Lefroy R D B , Blair G, Strong W M. Changes in soil organic matter with cropping as measured by organic carbon fractions and 13C natural isotope abundance. Plant and Soil, 1993, 155~156 : 399~4021.

[14] Zou X M, Ruan H H, Fu Y, et al. Estimating soil labile organic carbon and potential turnover rates using a sequential fumigation-incubation procedure. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 2005, 37: 1923~1928.

[15] 柳敏, 宇万太, 姜子绍, 等. 土壤活性有机碳. 生态学杂志, 2006, 25(11): 1412~1417.

[16] Cookson W R, Murphy D V, Roper M M. Characterizing the relationship between soil organic matter components and microbial function and composition along a tillage disturbance gradient. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2008, 40: 763~777.

[17] Zagal E, Munoz C, Quiroz M, et al. Sensitivity of early indicators for evaluating quality changes in soil organic matter. Geoderma, 2009, 151(3-4): 191~198.

[18] Huang B, Sun W, Zhao Y, et al. Temporal and spatial variability of soil organic matter and total nitrogen in an agricultural ecosystem as affected by farming practices. Geoderma, 2007, 139:336~345.

[19] Laik R, Koushlendra K, Das D K , et al. Labile soil organic matter pools in a calciorthent after 18 years of afforestation by different plantations. Applied Soil Ecology, 2009, 42: 71~78.

[20] Flie bach A, Oberholzer H R, Gunst L, et al. Soil organic matter and biological soil quality indicators after 21 years of organic and conventional farming. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2007, 118: 273~284.

[21] Haynes R J. Labile organic matter fractions as central components of the quality of agricultural soils: An overview. Advances in Agronomy, 2005, 85: 221~268.

[22] 李智广, 曹炜, 刘秉正, 等. 我国水土流失状况与发展趋势研究. 中国水土保持科学, 2008, 6(1): 57~62.

[23] 赵其国. 我国南方当前水土流失与生态安全中值得重视的问题. 水土保持通报, 2006, 26(2): 1~8.

[24] 田大伦, 项文化, 闫文德. 马尾松与湿地松人工林生物量动态及养分循环特征. 生态学报,2004, 24(10): 2207~2210.

[25] 王晶, 解宏图, 朱平, 等. 土壤活性有机质(碳)的内涵和现代分析方法概述. 生态学杂志, 2003, 22(6): 109~112.

[26] 杨丽霞, 潘剑君. 土壤活性有机碳库测定方法研究进展. 土壤通报, 2004, 35(4): 502~506.

[27] 吴建国, 张小全, 徐德应.六盘山林区几种土地利用方式下土壤活性有机碳的比较. 植物生态学报, 2004, 28(5): 657~664.

[28] 沈宏, 曹志洪, 徐志红. 施肥对土壤不同碳形态及碳库管理指数的影响. 土壤学报, 2000, 37(2): 166~173.

[29] 杨桦, 詹有生, 曾志光, 等.吉水三种造林模式林分生物量及生长量研究. 江西农业大学学报, 2004, 26 (2): 164~168.

[30] 雷志栋, 扬诗秀, 许志荣, 等. 土壤特性空间变异性初步研究. 水利学报, 1985, (9) : 10~21.

[31] McGrath D, Zhang C S. Spatial distribution of soil organic carbon concentrations in grassland of Ireland. Applied Geochemistry, 2003, 18: 1629~1639.

[32] Ajwa H A, Rice C W, Sotomayor D. Carbon and nitrogen mineralization in tall grass prairie and agriculture soil profile. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1998, 62: 942~951.

[33] 高俊琴, 欧阳华, 白军红. 若尔盖高寒湿地土壤活性有机碳垂直分布特征. 水土保持学报, 2006, 20(1): 76~86.

[34] 王淑平, 周广胜, 高素华, 等. 中国东北样带土壤活性有机碳的分布及其对气候变化的响应. 植物生态学报, 2003, 27(6): 780~785.

[35] Jiang P K, Xu Q F. Abundance and dynamics of soil labile carbon pools under different types of forest vegetation. Pedosphere, 2006, 16: 505~511.

[36] 何志斌, 赵文智, 刘鸽, 等. 祁连山青海云杉林斑表层土壤活性有机碳特征及其影响因素. 生态学报, 2006, 26(8): 2572~2577.

[37] 张伟, 张宏. 青藏高原东缘红原地区三种不同草甸土壤活性碳特征. 山地学报, 2008, 26(2): 205~211.

[38] 王建林, 欧阳华, 王忠红, 等. 高寒草原生态系统表层土壤活性有机碳分布特征及其影响因素——以贡嘎南山-拉轨岗日山为例. 生态学报, 2009, 29(7): 3501~3508.

[39] 李淑芬, 俞元春, 何晟. 南方森林土壤溶解有机碳与土壤因子的关系. 浙江林学院学报, 2003, 20 (2) : 119~123.
文章导航

/