Chinese urban indemnificatory housing system has a direct effect on indemnificatory communities.These national social spaces presented different types in different areas. This article, taking Guangzhou as the research area, divides Guangzhou's indemnificatory communities constructed since 1986 into four types by teasing the evolvement and implement of indemnificatory system in Guangzhou:the communities built from 1986 to 1998 which accommodated those families living in poor conditions from their workplaces, the communities built from 1999 to 2005 where those families with poor living conditions from Party & government organizations and educational & medical system dwelt, newly-built communities after 2006 which carried those low-income families with poor living conditions and Guangzhou's urban Hukou, the communities whose construction went through every stage and which carried the families from more types.The author applied "typical-research "to analyze every type's evolving path as well as sociospatial characteristics.Those characteristics were concluded as follows:hell-fired poverty and homogeneous space similar to western social public settlements under the free-welfare system (excluding the racial segregation), poverty space which falls in between the poor &heterogeneous space from Chinese urban ubiquitous poverty-centralized areas and mixed-and-ordered space from the western mixed-community but more heterogeneous, mixed space which falls in between the two but more ordered, non-poverty space similar to commercial communities.
[1] 魏立华,李志刚。中国城市低收入阶层的住房困境及其改善模式。城市规划学刊,2006,(2):53～58.
[2] 李志刚,薛德升,Michael Lyons,等。广州小北路黑人聚居区社会空间分析。地理学报,2008,63(2):207～218.
[3] Ma L J C,Xiang B.Native place,migration and the emergence of peasant enclaves in Beijing.The China Quarterly,1998,155:546～581.
[4] 李培林。村落的终结:羊城村的故事。北京:商务印书馆,2004.
[5] 周锐波,阎小培。集体经济:村落终结前的再组织纽带——以深圳“城中村”为例。经济地理,2009,29(4):628～634.
[6] Esping-Anderson G.The Three World of Welfare Capitalism.Cambridge:Polity Press,1990.
[7] Barlow J,Duncan S.Success and Failure in Housing Provision:European Systems Compared.Oxford:Pergamon,1994.
[8] Donnison D V,Clare U.Housing Policy:Ham ondsworth.Penguin Books Ltd,1982.
[9] Vale L J.The imaging of the city:Public housing and communication.Communication Research,1995,22(6):646～663.
[10] Zukin S.How'bad'is it?Institutions and intentions in the study of the American ghetto.International Journal ofUrban and Regional Research,1998,22:511～520.
[11] Leavitt J.Defining cultural differences in Space:Public housing as a microcosm.Urban Studies and Planning Program,University of Maryland,1994,15(3):75.
[12] Goering J M.Housing Desegregation and Federal Policy.Chapel Hill:University of North Carolina Press,1996.
[13] Checkoway B.Revitalizing an urban neighborhood:A St.Louis case study.In:Checkoway B,Patton C V.The MetropolitanMidwest:Policy Problems and Prospects for Change.Urbana:University of Illinois Press,1985.229～243.
[14] Goering J M.Opening housing opportunities:Changing federal housing policy in the United States.In:Boal F.Ethnicity and housing:Accommodating the differences.England:Ashgate,2000.
[15] Seong-Kyu Ha.Social housing estates and sustainable community development in South Korea.Habitat International,2008,32:349～363.
[16] Loo L S,Shi M Y,Sun S H.Public housing and ethnic integration in Singapore.Habitat International,2003,27:293～307.
[17] Weatherburn D,Lind B,Ku S.Hotbeds of crime?Crime and public housing in urban Sydney.Crime and Delinquency,1999,45:256～271.
[18] Holzman H R,Hyatt R A,Dempster J M.Patterns of aggravated assault in public housing:Mapping the nexus ofoffense,place,gender and race.Violence Against Women,2001,7:662～684.
[19] DeKeseredy W S,Alvi S,Schwartz M D,et al.Violence against and the harassment of women in Canadian publichousing.Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology,1999,36:499～516.
[20] DeKeseredy W S,Schwartz M D,Alvi S,et al.Perceived collective efficacy and women's victimization in publichousing.Criminal Justice:An International Journal of Policy and Practice,2003,3:5～27.
[21] Sampson R J,Raudenbush S W,Earls F.Neighborhoods and violence crime:A multilevel study of collective efficacy.Science,1997,277:918～924.
[22] Vale L J.Beyond the problem projects paradigm:Defining and revitalizing severely distressed public housing.Housing Policy Debate,1993,4(2):147～174.
[23] Wilson W J.When Work Disappears:The World of the New Urban Poor.New York:Knopf,1996.
[24] Murie A.Linking housing changes to crime.Social Policy and Administration,1997,31:22～36.
[25] Anderson P W.Complexity theory and organization science.Orgnanization Science,1999,10:216～232.
[26] 袁媛,许学强,薛德升。转型时期广州城市户籍人口新贫困的地域类型和分异机制。地理研究,2008,27(3):672～682.
[27] 刘玉亭,吴缚龙,何深静,等。转型期城市低收入邻里的类型、特征和产生机制:以南京为例。地理研究,2006,25(6):1073～1082.
[28] 马清裕,陈田,牛亚菲,等。北京城市贫困人口特征、成因及其解困对策。地理研究,1999,18(4):400～406.
[29] 赵静。深圳市非正规住房的发展演变与供给模式研究。广州:中山大学博士学位论文,2009.
[30] 余颖、唐劲峰。路已断梦已醒？——关于“小产权房”现象的深层次思考。城市规划,2009,33(1):41～45.
[31] 郑文升,丁四保,王晓芳,等。中国东北地区资源型城市棚户区改造与反贫困研究。地理科学,2008,28(2):156～161.
[32] 赵晔琴。外来者的进入与棚户区本地居民日常生活的重构。上海:华东师范大学硕士学位论文,2005.
[33] 杨靖,张嵩,汪冬宁。保障性住房的选址策略研究。城市规划,2009,33(12):53～59.
[34] 张永波,翟健。北京市保障性住房空间布局探讨。和谐城市规划-2007年中国城市规划年会论文集,哈尔滨:黑龙江科学技术出版社,2007.
[35] 张祚,李江风,刘艳中,等。经济适用房空间分布对居住空间分异的影响——以武汉市为例。城市问题,2007,(7):96～101.
[36] 李玲,王钰,李郇,等。解析安居解困居住区公建设施规划建设和运营——以广州三大安居解困居住区调研为例。城市规划,2008,32(5):51～55.
[37] 周素红,程璐萍,吴志东。广州市保障性住房社区居民的居住_就业选择与空间匹配性。地理研究,2010,29(10):1735～1745.
[38] 徐晓军。我国城市社区走向阶层化的实证分析——以武汉市两典型住宅区为例。城市发展研究,2000,(4):32～36.
[39] 吴晓。“边缘社区”探察——我国流动人口聚居区的现状特征透析。城市规划,2003,27(7):40～45.
[40] 郑文升,金玉霞,王晓芳,等。城市低收入住区治理与克服城市贫困——基于对深圳“城中村”和老工业基地城市“棚户区”的分析。城市规划,2007,31(5):52～57.
[41] 冯健,王永梅。中关村高校周边居住区社会空间特征及其形成机制。地理研究,2008,27(5):1003～1016.
[42] 刘云刚,谭宇文,周文婷。广州日本移民的生活活动与生活空间。地理学报,2010,65(10):1173～1186.
[43] 陆学艺。当代中国十大阶层分析。学习与实践,2002,(3):55～63.
[44] 单文慧。不同收入阶层混合居住模式——价值评判与实施策略。城市规划,2001,25(2):26～29(39).
