Relationship between landscape patterns and soil salinity based on canonical correspondence analysis in coastal reclamation area
Received date: 2016-07-25
Request revised date: 2016-12-06
Online published: 2017-03-20
Copyright
Coastal zone is an important land reserve resources. Its improvement and development has become a hot topic in many countries. Rudong coastal reclamation area was selected as the study area in this study. The canonical correspondence analysis was applied to analyze the relationship between soil salinization and landscape pattern at different scales, and to determine the contribution of the landscape index to the degree of soil salinization. The results showed that the patch density (PD), edge density (ED), landscape shape index (LSI), aggregation index (AI) and interspersion and juxtaposition index (IJI) of the study area were higher and varied in land use types that indicated the higher level of landscape fragmentation and more complex of landscape structure; The landscape structure was dominantly affected by anthropogenic activities. Soil Na+ and Cl- was the main component of soil salinity, accounting for 87.4% and 90.1% of the total cations and anions, respectively. The coefficient of variation of soil salinization index varied from 53.49% to 129.03%, which reflected the non-homogeneous distribution of soil salinity caused by anthropogenic activities. The result of canonical correspondence analysis showed that, landscape pattern variables in 100 m and 200 m buffer zones could explain 66.6% and 80.1% variations of soil salinization, respectively. The positive relationship was observed among the ratio of agricultural construction land, irrigated land and the level of soil salinity, while that of dry land was negatively correlated with the level of soil salinity. Soil salinization had a positive correlation with largest patch index (LPI) and contagion index (CONTAG), while as it had a negative correlation with PD, ED, LSI and Shannon's diversity index (SHDI) on landscape level. On patch class level, LPI, ED and LSI were the Colinear indicators affecting the soil salinization. Finally, the study on the relationship between landscape patterns and soil salinization may be of great significance to optimize the land use pattern and to reduce the degree of soil salinization.
XIE Xuefeng , PU Lijie , ZHU Ming , XU Yan , WANG Xiaohan , XU Caiyao , CHEN Xinjian . Relationship between landscape patterns and soil salinity based on canonical correspondence analysis in coastal reclamation area[J]. GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH, 2017 , 36(3) : 495 -505 . DOI: 10.11821/dlyj201703008
Fig. 1 Location of the study area图1 研究区域位置 |
Tab. 1 Landscape pattern index of reclamation area in Rudong county表1 如东垦区景观格局指数 |
| 土地利用类型 | 景观格局指数 | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA(km2) | PLAND(%) | PD | LPI(%) | ED | LSI | PAFRAC | IJI | AI | CONTAG | SHDI | |
| 旱地 | 14.87 | 21.20 | 30.22 | 0.58 | 134.15 | 61.16 | 1.31 | 77.89 | 95.32 | - | - |
| 水田 | 1.90 | 2.70 | 5.35 | 0.15 | 16.37 | 20.88 | 1.12 | 79.60 | 95.66 | - | - |
| 居民点 | 4.64 | 6.62 | 32.34 | 0.28 | 65.48 | 53.62 | 1.26 | 77.52 | 92.26 | - | - |
| 农建地 | 6.26 | 8.93 | 10.11 | 4.01 | 91.18 | 65.49 | 1.51 | 86.03 | 94.66 | - | - |
| 水浇地 | 16.63 | 23.71 | 21.47 | 0.28 | 118.46 | 51.52 | 1.21 | 72.47 | 96.28 | - | - |
| 林草地 | 1.97 | 2.81 | 2.15 | 0.80 | 10.86 | 13.79 | 1.29 | 77.47 | 97.26 | - | - |
| 养殖坑塘 | 12.48 | 17.79 | 19.80 | 0.53 | 92.07 | 45.97 | 1.20 | 81.20 | 96.18 | - | - |
| 河流沟渠 | 10.86 | 15.48 | 5.45 | 5.76 | 170.17 | 90.99 | 1.50 | 78.64 | 91.80 | - | - |
| 滩涂盐沼 | 0.54 | 0.77 | 2.10 | 0.19 | 3.58 | 11.45 | 1.21 | 53.32 | 95.71 | - | - |
| 总计 | 70.15 | 100.00 | 128.98 | 5.76 | 351.15 | 75.05 | 1.26 | 79.00 | 94.77 | 50.25 | 1.89 |
Fig. 2 classification of land use types in Rudongcoastal reclamation area图2 如东滩涂围垦区土地利用分类 |
Tab. 2 Descriptive statistical values of soil salinity indicator in surface soil (0~20 cm)表2 表层土壤(0~20 cm)盐分指标描述性统计值 |
| 指标 | 最小值 | 最大值 | 平均值 | 标准差 | 变异系数 | 偏度 | 峰度 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ca2+(cmol/kg) | 0.03 | 2.13 | 0.31 | 0.40 | 129.03 | 3.43 | 14.41 |
| Mg2+(cmol/kg) | 0.06 | 3.54 | 1.08 | 1.21 | 112.04 | 0.99 | -0.58 |
| Na+(cmol/kg) | 0.06 | 39.13 | 11.83 | 12.79 | 108.11 | 0.72 | -1.02 |
| K+(cmol/kg) | 0.01 | 0.87 | 0.32 | 0.29 | 90.63 | 0.52 | -1.25 |
| HCO3-(cmol/kg) | 0.20 | 1.55 | 0.43 | 0.23 | 53.49 | 4.29 | 21.21 |
| SO42-(cmol/kg) | 0.05 | 2.92 | 0.83 | 0.81 | 97.59 | 1.08 | 0.13 |
| Cl-(cmol/kg) | 0.02 | 43.65 | 11.45 | 14.28 | 124.72 | 1.03 | -0.46 |
| St (g/kg) | 0.41 | 27.96 | 8.35 | 8.94 | 107.07 | 0.93 | -0.57 |
| SAR | 0.15 | 28.15 | 11.71 | 9.53 | 81.38 | 0.20 | -1.53 |
Tab. 3 Eigenvalues, and cumulative variances of CCA ordination on the landscape level表3 景观水平CCA排序的特征值及累积解释量 |
| 缓冲距离 | 排序轴 | 特征值 | 景观格局与过程特征相关性 | 过程特征累积解释量(%) | 格局—过程关系累积解释量(%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100 m | AX 1 | 0.108 | 0.836 | 59.6 | 89.5 |
| AX 2 | 0.013 | 0.690 | 66.6 | 100.0 | |
| AX 3 | 0.047 | 0.000 | 92.4 | 0.0 | |
| AX 4 | 0.014 | 0.000 | 100.0 | 0.0 | |
| 200 m | AX 1 | 0.136 | 0.939 | 75.1 | 93.7 |
| AX 2 | 0.009 | 0.582 | 80.1 | 100.0 | |
| AX 3 | 0.024 | 0.000 | 93.4 | 0.0 | |
| AX 4 | 0.012 | 0.000 | 100.0 | 0.0 |
Fig. 3 CCA ordination of soil salinization and landscape pattern on landscape level图3 景观水平景观格局与土壤盐渍化CCA排序 |
Fig. 4 CCA ordination of soil salinization and landscape pattern on class level in agricultural construction land图4 农建地类型水平景观格局与土壤盐渍化CCA排序 |
Fig. 5 CCA ordination of soil salinization and landscape pattern on class level in irrigated land图5 水浇地类型水平景观格局与土壤盐渍化CCA排序 |
Fig. 6 CCA ordination of soil salinization and landscape pattern on class level in dry land图6 旱地类型水平景观格局与土壤盐渍化CCA排序 |
Fig. 7 Statistical value of soil salt content (St) and SAR at 0-20 cm at different reclamation times图7 不同围垦年限下0~20 cm土壤St和SAR的统计值 |
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
| [1] |
[
|
| [2] |
[
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
[
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
买买提·沙吾提, 塔西甫拉提·特依拜,
[Mamatsawut,
|
| [9] |
[
|
| [10] |
[
|
| [11] |
[
|
| [12] |
[
|
| [13] |
[
|
| [14] |
[
|
| [15] |
国土资源部. GB-T21010-2007. 土地利用现状分类标准. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2007.
[
|
| [16] |
[
|
| [17] |
[
|
| [18] |
[
|
| [19] |
[
|
| [20] |
[
|
| [21] |
[
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
[
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |