Spatial and temporal variation analysis of ecosystem water use efficiency in Central Asia and Xinjiang in recent 15 years
Received date: 2017-03-04
Request revised date: 2017-07-11
Online published: 2017-09-15
Copyright
It is a great significance to study the carbon-water cycle which accurately evaluates the temporal and spatial variabilities of ecosystems water use efficiency (WUE). In this study, the linear regression method and Mann-Kendall test were used to study the variabilities of spatial pattern of GPP, ET and WUE in the five Central Asian countries and Xinjiang from 2000 to 2014, then, the results of parameter tests of GPP, ET and WUE were combined and classified to analyze the causes of changes of WUE. The results showed that: (1) GPP, ET and WUE in the study area had no significant changes in time series. The spatial distribution of WUE had significant increases in the northern part of Kazakhstan, Ili Valley and alpine region in Kyrghyzstan, and had decreases in the south Xinjiang and the irrigated area of Uzbekistan. (2) The main land cover types which led to changes of WUE were farmland and grassland, and area with the medium density population had the great changes of WUE. (3) Theincreased WUE was resulted from the increased GPP and the decreased ET. The increased GPP was due to the increased precipitation and the Green for Grain Project, and the decreased ET was due to the response of vegetation to drought stress; the decreased WUE was mainly due to the changes of crops planted and unreasonable water use in the irrigated agricultural area in Central Asia and Xinjiang. This study on the basis of the variabilities of spatial pattern of WUE can provide a theoretical basis for the successful implementation of the "Belt and Road Initiative".
ZOU Jie , DING Jianli , YANG Shengtian . Spatial and temporal variation analysis of ecosystem water use efficiency in Central Asia and Xinjiang in recent 15 years[J]. GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH, 2017 , 36(9) : 1742 -1754 . DOI: 10.11821/dlyj201709011
Tab. 1 The classification of WUE表1 WUE分类方法 |
| WUE | GPP | ET | 分类简写 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 上升 | 上升 | 上升 | UUU |
| 上升 | 下降 | UUD | |
| 下降 | 下降 | UDD | |
| 下降 | 下降 | 下降 | DDD |
| 下降 | 上升 | DDU | |
| 上升 | 上升 | DUU |
Fig. 1 The variation of WUE in five Central Asian countries and Xinjiang region from 2000 to 2014图1 2000-2014年中亚5国及新疆地区WUE的变化 |
Fig. 2 The changes of GPP in five Central Asian countries and Xinjiang region图2 中亚五国及新疆地区GPP变化趋势 |
Fig. 3 The changes of ET in five Central Asian countries and Xinjiang region图3 中亚五国及新疆地区ET变化趋势 |
Fig. 4 The changes of WUE in five Central Asian countries and Xinjiang region图4 中亚五国及新疆地区WUE变化趋势 |
Tab.2 The percentage of the area where WUE changed obviously in five Central Asian countries and Xinjiang region (%)表2 中亚5国和新疆地区WUE显著变化面积的百分比(%) |
| GPP | ET | WUE | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 显著上升 | 显著下降 | 显著上升 | 显著下降 | 显著上升 | 显著下降 | |||
| XJ | 9.2BC | 0.9A | 2.7A | 6.7B | 19.2B | 2.0AB | ||
| UZB | 1.6AB | 13.1B | 0.8A | 3.5AB | 5.1A | 7.0B | ||
| TKM | 0.4A | 4.9A | 0.4A | 1.1A | 0.5A | 3.3AB | ||
| TJK | 8.3BC | 1.3A | 1.1A | 0.5A | 24.0B | 5.2B | ||
| KGZ | 23.4D | 0.3A | 0.5A | 2.7AB | 71.7D | 0.0A | ||
| KZA | KZA | 2.2A | 0.4A | 27.5C | 63.0C | 0.1A | ||
注:大写字母代表不同分组间的等值比较,例如第一列相同字母代表不同国家GPP显著上升的比例相同,不同字母代表不同国家GPP上升比例有差异,下同。 |
Tab.3 The percentage of the area where WUE changed obviously in each population density (%)表3 不同人口密度WUE显著变化面积百分比(%) |
| GPP | ET | WUE | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 显著上升 | 显著下降 | 显著上升 | 显著下降 | 显著上升 | 显著下降 | |||
| 高密度人口区 | 18.7B | 7.9B | 7.4B | 11.8A | 41A | 9.2B | ||
| 低密度人口区 | 44.5C | 19.4C | 0.3A | 14.2A | 36.5A | 0.4A | ||
| 中密度人口区 | 8.3A | 2.4A | 0.9A | 23.5B | 55.4B | 1.1A | ||
Fig.5 The percentage of WUE under different HILLs图5 不同人类影响因子下WUE变化的百分比 |
Tab.4 The percentage of WUE which changed obviously under different land cover patterns (%)表4 不同土地覆盖类型下WUE显著变化的百分比(%) |
| GPP | ET | WUE | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 显著上升 | 显著下降 | 显著上升 | 显著下降 | 显著上升 | 显著下降 | |||
| 灌木 | 2.9A | 5.3A | 1.1A | 4.5A | 14.0A | 4.8A | ||
| 草地 | 9.2B | 2.0A | 1.0A | 23.8B | 54.2C | 0.3A | ||
| 农田 | 8.5B | 6.3A | 1.9A | 22.1B | 75.5D | 5.1A | ||
| 森林 | 3.8AB | 1.9A | 0.3A | 5.1A | 41.6B | 0.5A | ||
Fig. 6 The changes of different classes of WUE in five Central Asian countries and Xinjiang region图6 中亚五国及新疆地区不同分类WUE趋势变化 |
Fig. 7 The comparison of WUE among different studies图7 不同研究WUE的比较 |
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
[
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
[
|
| [6] |
[
|
| [7] |
[
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
[
|
| [29] |
[
|
| [30] |
[
|
| [31] |
[
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
[
|
| [34] |
[
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
[
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |