Investigating the relationship between photochemical reflectance index (PRI) and light-use efficiency (LUE) during different seasons in a subtropical needle-leaf and broadleaf mixed forest
Received date: 2017-05-04
Request revised date: 2017-09-07
Online published: 2017-11-20
Copyright
:Light use efficiency (LUE) is a critical parameter for remote sensing estimation of ecosystem productivity. Therefore, accurate estimates of spatio-temporal variation of LUE is essentially required. Photochemical reflectance index (PRI) has been widely accepted to hold the potential to track the LUE variations. Here we combined spectral and eddy covariance observations in a subtropical mixed forest to investigate the ability of PRI to estimate LUE at a half-hourly time-scale in different seasons. The forest is located at Dinghu mountain forest ecological experiment station in Zhaoqing of Guangdong province and the observations ranged from April 2014 to March 2015. The results showed that: (1) LUE was significantly correlated with PRI but the correlation strength was different in different seasons; The correlation was the strongest in winter (R2=0.40, P<0.01) and the weakest in summer (R2=0.04, P<0.01). (2) The standardized PRI (∆PRI), which removes noises from canopy and soil background, did not well capture the dynamics of LUE. (3) Photosynthetic active radiation (PAR) had the largest influence on the relationship between LUE and PRI among various climatic variables. Our analysis featured the temporal limitation of PRI in estimating LUE in subtropical forests and similar efforts are needed to quantify PRI ability to estimate LUE in other ecosystem types.
LI Yanmu , WANG Shaoqiang , QIAN Zhaohui , CHEN Diecong , ZHANG Leiming , ZHOU Guoyi , YAN Junhua , MENG Ze . Investigating the relationship between photochemical reflectance index (PRI) and light-use efficiency (LUE) during different seasons in a subtropical needle-leaf and broadleaf mixed forest[J]. GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH, 2017 , 36(11) : 2239 -2250 . DOI: 10.11821/dlyj201711016
Fig. 1 Correlations between half-hourly LUE and PRI from April 2014 to March 2015.图1 各季节半小时尺度LUE-PRI相关性 |
Fig. 2 Correlations between half-hourly LUE and PRI in each month from April 2014 to March 2015图2 半小时尺度LUE-PRI相关性 |
Tab.1 The mean of environmental factors from April 2014 to March 2015表1 2014年4月-2015年3月各环境因子平均值 |
| 月份 | PAR(J) | Ta(℃) | VPD |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2014年4月 | 134 | 21.19 | 0.30 |
| 2014年5月 | 284 | 27.71 | 0.60 |
| 2014年6月 | 262 | 27.09 | 0.62 |
| 2014年7月 | 254 | 28.28 | 0.62 |
| 2014年8月 | 223 | 27.28 | 0.47 |
| 2014年9月 | 240 | 26.33 | 0.36 |
| 2014年10月 | 250 | 23.39 | 0.45 |
| 2014年11月 | 156 | 18.11 | 0.20 |
| 2014年12月 | 168 | 11.54 | 0.36 |
| 2015年1月 | 201 | 13.35 | 0.49 |
| 2015年2月 | 124 | 14.28 | 0.32 |
| 2015年3月 | 80 | 14.72 | 0.16 |
Fig. 3 Monthly comparison of correlation strength (R2) of LUE-PRI and LUE-∆PRI from April 2014 to March 2015图3 不同月份LUE和∆PRI、PRI的相关性情况对比图 注:图中实线是LUE-∆PRI的R2平均值,虚线是LUE-PRI的R2平均值。 |
Fig. 4 Correlations between PRI/LUE and environmental variables (PAR, Ta and VPD) in each month (a and b) and each season (c and d)图4 月尺度、季节尺度LUE-PRI及PRI、LUE与环境因子(PAR、Ta、VPD)的相关性 |
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
[
|
| [8] |
[
|
| [9] |
[
|
| [10] |
[
|
| [11] |
[
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
[
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
[
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
[
|
| [35] |
[
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
[
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
[
|
| [40] |
[
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
[
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |