Since the 1900s, the research of human geography has changed from macro to micro perspective. Time-geography, which was born during the late 1960s, provides an effective tool for the micro-research. During the last several decades, the theory and research method of time-geography has been deeply developed. As an important part of time-geography, the research of spatio-temporal structure of daily activities has made great progress, with the trend of classified individual research. At the same time, as the special phenomenon during the development of the city, 'village in city’ has been paid more and more attention by the government, scholars and so on. Thus, the study on the migrant, which is the main body of population in 'village in city’, is significant for the transformation of 'village in city’. What is more, the study can also provide references for analyses of the spatio-temporal structure of daily activities from the classified individual research with questionnaire survey. Based on the questionnaire surveys in five 'villages in city’ in Beijing, the article analyzes the characteristics of time allocation and spatio-temporal structure of the activities of migrants in 'village in city’ through the individual perspective. The conclusion can be drawn as follows. First, work is the dominating activity on weekdays and has restrictive function on other activities, while recreation is the dominating activity on weekends. Thus, gender differences are significant in characteristics of time allocation. Second, many characteristics are consistent between men and women on the spatio-temporal structure of the activities of migrants in 'village in city’ on weekdays and weekends. Third, as to the time allocation of the activities of migrants in 'village in city’, most time is spent at home on weekends. Fourth, the people take most recreation activities in the evening and make a "busy hour". Fifth, as to the gender differences, men spend more time on recreation activities outside while women spend more time on housework, especially, men's trip distance is greater than women's. The conclusions can be useful for the policy making of 'villages in city’ and it can provide fundamental materials for the further study on urban spatio-temporal structure and urban planning through the analysis of the regularity of individual activities.
LAN Zong-min, FENG Jian
. The time allocation and spatio-temporal structure of the activities of migrants in 'village in city’: Surveys in five 'villages in city&rsquo|in Beijing[J]. GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH, 2010
, 29(6)
: 1092
-1104
.
DOI: 10.11821/yj2010060014
[1] 闫小培,魏立华,周锐波.快速城市化地区城乡关系协调研究——以广州市"城中村"改造为例.城市规划,2004,28(3):30~38.
[2] 李培林.巨变:村落的终结——都市里的村庄研究.中国社会科学,2002,(1):168~179.
[3] 千庆兰,陈颖彪.我国大城市流动人口聚居区初步研究——以北京"浙江村"和广州石牌地区为例.城市规划,2003,27(11):60~64.
[4] 蓝宇蕴.城中村空间结构的社会因素分析.学术研究,2008,(3):90~95.
[5] 李俊夫,孟昊.从"二元"向"一元"的转制——城中村改造中的土地制度突破及其意义.中国土地,2004,(10):25~27.
[6] 肖小霞.城中村的社会群体结构研究.中南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版),2008,28(1):120~124.
[7] Hgerstrand T. What about people in regional science? Regional Sence Association, Papers and Proceedings, 1970,(24): 7~21.
[8] Chapin F S. Human Activity Patterns in the city. NY: John Wiley and Sons, 1974.
[9] Jakle J A, Brunn S,Roseman C C. Human Spatial Behavior. North Scituate, MA: Duxbury Press,1976.
[10] Thrift N. Time and theory in geography. Part1;Part2. Progress in Human Geography,1977,(1): 65~101, 413~457.
[11] Shapcott M, Steadman P. Rhythms of urban activity. In:Carlstein T, Parkes D,Thrift N. Human Activity and time Geography (Volume 2). London: Edward Arnold, 1978. 49~74.
[12] Grling T, Brnns K, Garvill J,et al. Household activity scheduling. The Fifth World Conference on Transportation Research, Yokohama, 1989.
[13] Cullen I G. The treatment of time in the explanation of spatial behavior. In: Carlstein T,et al. Timing Space and Spacing Time. Vol. 2: Human Activity and Time Geography. London: Edward Arnold,1978.
[14] Kitamura R. An evaluation of activity-based travel analysis. Transportation, 1988, 15(1): 9~34.
[15] Miller H J. Modeling accessibility using space-time prism concepts within geographical information system. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 1991,(5): 287~301.
[16] 冈本耕平.都市空间の认知と行动.东京:古今书院,2000.288.
[17] 森川洋.東広島市にける中心地の勢力圏と消費者行動.広島大学大学院文学研究科论集.1980,40:127~163.
[18] 柴彦威.中日城市结构比较研究.北京:北京大学出版社,1999.22~78.
[19] 许学强,胡华颖,叶嘉安. 广州市社会空间结构的因子生态分析.地理学报,1989,44(4):385~399.
[20] 崔功豪.中国城市边缘区空间结构特征及其发展——以南京等城市为例.地理学报,1990,45(5):399~411.
[21] 吴启焰,崔功豪.南京市居住空间分异特征及其形成机制.城市规划,1999,23(12):23~35.
[22] 王兴中.中国城市社会空间结构研究.北京:科学出版社,2000.66~79.
[23] 顾朝林,王法辉,刘贵利.北京城市社会区分析.地理学报,2003,58(6):917~926.
[24] 冯健,周一星.北京都市区社会空间结构及其演化(1982~2000).地理研究,2003,22(4):465~483.
[25] 李志刚,吴缚龙.转型期上海社会空间分异研究.地理学报,2006,61(2):199~211.
[26] 柴彦威,等.中国城市的时空间结构.北京:北京大学出版社,2002.9~30,106~161.
[27] 李峥嵘,柴彦威.大连城市居民周末休闲时间的利用特征.经济地理,1999,19(5):80~84.
[28] 刘志林,柴彦威,龚华.深圳市民休闲时间利用特征研究.人文地理,2000,15(6):73~78.
[29] 龚华,柴彦威,刘志林.深圳市民工作日生活活动时空间结构特征研究.人文地理,2000,15(6):60~66.
[30] 冯健,陈秀欣,兰宗敏.北京市居民购物行为空间结构演变.地理学报,2007,62(10):1083~1096.
[31] 王茂军,宋国庆,许洁.基于决策树法的北京城市居民通勤距离模式挖掘,地理研究,2009,28(6):1516~1527.
[32] 刘玉亭.转型期中国城市贫困的社会空间.北京:科学出版社,2005.115~132.
[33] 张纯,柴彦威,李昌霞.北京城市老年人的日常活动路径及其时空特征.地域研究与开发,2007,26(4):116~119.
[34] 薛德升,蔡静珊,李志刚.广州市城中村农民工医疗行为及其空间特征——以新凤凰村为例,地理研究,2009,28(5):1341~1351.
[35] 甄峰,魏宗财,杨山,等.信息技术对城市居民出行特征的影响——以南京为例,地理研究,2009,28(5):1307~1317.
[36] 李郇,许学强.广州市城市意象空间分析.人文地理,1993,8(3):27~35.
[37] 顾朝林,宋国臣.北京城市意象空间及构成要素研究.地理学报,2001,56(1):64~74.
[38] 冯健.北京城市居民的空间感知与意象空间结构.地理科学,2005,25(2):142~154.
[39] 王德,张昀,崔昆仑.基于SD法的城市感知研究——以浙江台州地区为例,地理研究,2009,28(6):1528~1536.
