Size effect of housing price and size standard in Beijing
Received date: 2009-06-30
Revised date: 2009-10-28
Online published: 2010-03-20
Due to absence of practical housing standards, the structure of housing market in Chinese cities has been seriously distorted and housing supplies are incapable to satisfy reasonable demands. Therefore, it is of great significance and in emergency to stipulate appropriate standards to guide housing construction and consumption. To this end, this study addressed the issue of housing floor area standard. First, it proposed an empirical framework for analyzing floor area standard, i.e., the problem of determining floor area standard was formulated as an optimization problem of maximizing the utilities of households. Then, it reported an empirical study in Beijing. Using the second-hand apartment house data in the Asian-Olympic Village area, the benefit and cost of households with respect to the size of houses were examined with a hedonic regression approach. It was found that the prices of second-hand apartment houses significantly differed by housing floor areas, and the critical size thresholds were identified by the regression analysis. Based on the results, the standard of appropriate housing size was presented and suggestions were made on the regulation of housing market. Specifically, (1) it would be economically efficient to control the minimum and preferential levels of apartment housing. It is recommended to take 50 m2 as the minimum level, and 80 m2 for the preferential level. (2) It is recommended to take 50~60 m2 as suitable size standard for small families. To encourage stepwise consumption, the government might consider decreasing housing transfer costs by reducing tax or providing stipend for the development of small units.
Key words： housing standard; floor area; housing market; marginal effect; hedonic approach
GAO Xiao-lu . Size effect of housing price and size standard in Beijing[J]. GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH, 2010 , 29(3) : 500 -509 . DOI: 10.11821/yj2010030013
[1] 郑正,扈媛.从住区的可持续发展看我国城市住宅面积标准和小汽车进入家庭,城市规划汇刊, 1998,(2): 43~44.
[2] 陈保禄.城市住宅建设标准影响机制新探,上海城市管理职业技术学院学报, 2007,(2): 48~51.
[3] 梁文敏.商品住宅建筑面积标准初探,南方建筑, 1998,(3): 29~34.
[4] 周燕珉.我国廉租房建筑设计研究,住区, 2007, 27: 22~27.
[5] 田东海.住房政策:国际经验借鉴和中国现实选择, 1998,北京:清华大学出版社.
[6] 刘贵文,李婧.我国家庭住房适宜居住面积研究,住宅科技, 2007,(2): 5~9.
[7] 廖中华.普通商品房定位与设计要点,新建筑, 1999,(5): 19~21.
[8] 朱建达.控制城市住宅建筑面积标准, 新建筑, 2000,(2): 42~44.
[9] 车延杰.吉林省城镇居民住宅购买能力实证研究,当代经济研究, 2001,(5): 57~60.
[10] 施梁. 由土地资源约束看未来我国城镇居民住房面积水平定位, 建筑学报, 2002,(8): 4~5.
[11] Follain J R,Lim G C, Renaud B.Housing crowding in developing countries and willingness to pay for additional space: The case of Korea.Journal of Development Economics, 1982, 11(2):249~272.
[12] Ravallion M. The welfare cost of housing standards: Theory with application to Jakarta. Journal of Urban Economics, 1989, 26(2): 197~211.
[13] Cheshire P, Mills E S.Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, 1999, North-Holland.
[14] Boardman A, Greenberg D H, Vining A R, et al.Cost Benefit Analysis: Concepts and Practice (Second Edition), Prentice Hall, 2001.
[15] 王德, 黄万枢.Hedonic住宅价格法及其应用.城市规划,2005,(3):62~71.
[16] Gao X, Asami Y. A study on the externality effects of lot size and land division in urban detached residential areas. Paper presented on the World Forum on Urbanizing World and UN Habitat II (UN Habitat II - Istanbul +5), 2001, New York.
[17] 王冬辉, 郭祖军.Hedonic模型在商品住宅价格分析中的应用——以深圳为例的实证分析.特区经济, 2006,(12): 354~355.
[18] 周华,李同升.基于Hedonic模型的西安市住宅价格空间分异机制研究.西安文理学院学报(自然科学版), 2007, 10(2): 68~71.
[18] 刘芳.成都市商品房价格影响因素的实证研究.统计与咨询,2008,(4): 36~37.
[19] 张冕, 陈守明.基于Hedonic定价理论的上海房地产价格实证分析.金融经济, 2008,(6): 72~74.
[20] 邵飞波, 张鑫. 基于Hedonic模型的上海住宅价格影响因素分析.经济论坛, 2007, 23: 9~12.
[21] 高晓路. 北京亚奥地区居住环境设计与管理的经济利益, 地理学报, 2007, 62,(2): 147~156.
[22] 周春山.广州市建成区住房空间结构及其成因, 地理研究, 2005, 24,(1): 77~88.
[23] 王茂军.大连市城市内部居住环境评价的空间结构—基于面源模型的分析, 地理研究, 2002,(6), 753~762.
[24] 张文忠.北京城市内部居住空间分布与居民居住空间偏好,地理研究, 2003,(6), 751~759.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |