A carbon budget of alpine steppe area in the Tibetan Plateau
Received date: 2009-01-14
Revised date: 2009-03-02
Online published: 2010-01-20
The Tibetan Plateau, the third pole of the earth, is one of the least human-disturbed regions in the world. Its outstanding topographic feature and ecological characteristics have significant effects on modern atmospheric circulation and climate, so the greenhouse gases emission and absorption are linked to climate changes at local, regional and even global scales. Also, to examine or estimate the actual magnitude of carbon uptake or release from this terrestrial ecosystem has become the central issue in global carbon cycle researches. However, relatively few studies have been reported in the literatures about the carbon contributions of the alpine grassland area on the Tibetan Plateau. In this paper, we use a mechanistically based ecological simulation model to describe and analyze the spatial pattern of terrestrial net primary productivity (NPP), carbon fluxes and net ecosystem productivity (NEP) in this alpine steppe area. The NASA-CASA (Carnegie-Ames-Stanford Biosphere) model is designed to simulate seasonal patterns in net carbon fixation and allocation, litterfall, and soil nutrient mineralization, and soil CO2 emissions. Our fundamental approach is to use CASA to estimate net primary production (NPP) in the alpine steppe area on the Tibetan Plateau. We combined MODIS data and CASA to estimate NPP, and soil carbon emissions were calculated by the regression formula obtained in the pre-study. Upon these, we estimated the carbon budget for each of the 0.05° latitude×0.05° longitude grid cells in the alpine steppe area. The potential annual net primary productivity (NPP) of this alpine steppe area is estimated to be 20.57×1012g · a-1 of carbon. The annual NPP has the distinct spatial distribution, whereas vegetation NPP decreased gradually from southeast to northwest due to the temperature and precipitation gradients. Soil carbon emission (heterotrophic respiration) is estimated to be 8.07×1012g · a-1. Net ecosystem productivity (NEP), an indicator for carbon budget, is the difference between annual net primary productivity (NPP) and annual soil respiration. Determination of net ecosystem productivity showed that the alpine steppe ecosystem acts as a distinct carbon sink (12.50×1012 g · a-1 of carbon), although this carbon reservoir is quite small.
Key words： carbon budget; NPP; respiration; alpine steppe; Tibetan Plateau
PEI Zhi-yong, ZHOU Cai-ping, OUYANG Hua, YANG Wen-bin . A carbon budget of alpine steppe area in the Tibetan Plateau[J]. GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH, 2010 , 29(1) : 102 -110 . DOI: 10.11821/yj2010010010
[1] Ciais P, Tans P P, Trolier M, et al. A large northern hemisphere terrestrial CO2 sink indicated by 13C/12C ratio of atmospheric CO2. Science, 1995,269: 1098~1102.
[2] Schimel D S, House J I, Hibbard K A, et al. Recent patterns and mechanisms of carbon exchange by terrestrial ecosystems. Nature, 2001, 414: 169~172.
[3] Tans P, White J W C. In balance, with a little help from the plants. Science, 1998,281: 183~184.
[4] Schlesinger W H, Lichter J. Limited carbon storage in soil and litter of experimental forest plots under increased atmospheric CO2. Nature, 2001, 411: 466~469.
[5] Walker B, Will S. A synthesis of GCTE and related research. in IGBP Science, 1997, No.1, IGBP Secretariat, Sweden pp32.
[6] 方精云,朴世龙,赵淑清. CO2失汇与北半球中高纬度陆地生态系统的碳汇. 植物生态学报,2001,25(5):594~602.
[7] 郑度,张荣祖,杨勤业.试论青藏高原的自然地带. 地理学报, 1979,34(1):1~11.
[8] 郑度,李炳元.青藏高原自然环境的演化与分异. 地理研究,1990,9(2):1~10.
[9] 罗天祥,李文华,冷允法,等. 青藏高原自然植被总生物量的估算与净初级生产量的潜在分布. 地理研究,1998,17(4):337~344.
[10] 徐兴奎,陈红,LEVY Jason K. 气候变暖背景下青藏高原植被覆盖特征的时空变化及其成因分析. 科学通报,2008,53(4): 456 ~462.
[11] 张永强, 唐艳鸿, 姜杰.青藏高原草地生态系统土壤有机碳动态特征. 中国科学(D),2006, 36 (12): 1140~1147.
[12] 杨元合,朴世龙. 青藏高原草地植被覆盖变化及其与气候因子的关系. 植物生态学报,2006, 30 (1):1~8
[13] Lieth H, Box E. Evapotranspiration and primary productivity; C.W. Thornthwaite Memorial Model. C.W. Thornthwaite Assoc., Centerton-Elmer, NJ. Publ. Cllimatol, 1972,25(2):37~46.
[14] Lieth H. Primary production: Terrestrial ecosystems. Human Ecol, 1973,1: 303~332.
[15] Meentemeyer V, Box E O, Thompson R. World patterns and amounts of terrestrial plant litter production. Bioscience, 1982,32:125~128.
[16] Potter C S, Klooster S A, Brooks V. Interannual variability in terrestrial net primary production: Exploration of trends and controls on regional to global scales. Ecosystems, 1999,2(1): 36~48.
[17] Monteith J L. Solar radiation and productivity in tropical ecosystems. Journal of Applied Ecology, 1972,9:747~766.
[18] Potter C S, Randerson J T, Field C B,et al. Terrestrial ecosystem production: A process model based on global satellite and surface data. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 1993,7(4): 811~841.
[19] Priestley C H B, Taylor R J. On the assessment of surface heat flux and evaporation using large-scale parameters. Mon. Weather Rev, 1972,100: 81~92.
[20] Thornthwaite C W, Mather J R. Instructions and tables for computing potential evapotranspiration and the water balance. Drexel Inst. Technol. Publ. Clim. 1957,X(3).
[21] Vorosmarty C J, Moore III B, Grace A L,et al. Continental scale models of water balance and fluvial transport: An application to South America. Global Biogeochem. Cycles, 1989,3:241~265.
[22] Pei Z, Ouyang H, Zhou C, Xu X. Carbon balance in an alpine grassland ecosystem on the Tibetan Plateau. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology. 2009,51(5):521~526.
[23] Knyazikhin Y, Martonchik J V, Myneni R B,et al. Synergistic algorithm for estimating vegetation canopy leaf area index and fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation from MODIS and MISR data. Journal of Geophysical Research,1998,103: 32257~32276.
[24] Daly C, Taylor G H, Gibson W P, et al. High-quality spatial climate data sets for the United States and beyond. Transactions of the ASAE,2000,43: 1957~1962.
[25] New M, Hulme M, Jones P D. Global 30-year mean monthly climatology, 1961-1990(New et al.). Available online at from the ORNL Distributed Active Archive Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA. 2000.
[26] Webb R W, Rosenzweig C E, Levine E R. Global soil texture and derived water-holding capacities (Webb et al.), 2000, Available online at from the ORNL Distributed Active Archive Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA.
[27] 高清竹,万运帆,李玉娥,等. 藏北高寒草地NPP变化趋势及其对人类活动的响应. 生态学报,2007,27(11):4612~4619.
[28] Raich J W, Rastetter E B, Melillo J M, et al. Potential net primary production in South America: Application of a global model. Ecological Application, 1991, 1:399~429.
[29] Schindler D W. The mysterious missing sink. Nature, 1999, 398:105~106.
[30] 方精云. 探索CO2失汇之谜. 植物生态学报,2002,26(2):255~256.
[31] ZHAO L, LI Y, XU S, et al. Diurnal, seasonal and annual variation in net ecosystem CO2 exchange of an alpine shrubland on Qinghai-Tibetan plateau. Global Change Biology, 2006, 12:1940~1953.
[32] KATO T,TANG Y,GU S, et al. Temperature and biomass influences on interannual changes in CO2 exchange in an alpine meadow on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Global Change Biology, 2006, 12:1285~1298.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |