The evaluation system and methods designed for estimating the developing maturation of recreation belt around metropolises
Received date: 2010-02-01
Revised date: 2010-05-13
Online published: 2010-08-25
The article puts forward the concept of Developing Maturation of ReBAM (Recreation Belt around Metropolises) on the basis of recent ReBAM researches which have the tendency towards micro-viewpoint and its relationship with regional environment. The concept is used to describe the developing status of ReBAM in the whole or some special regions. The authors design the evaluation system and methods which include 4 standards and 13 sub-factors. The 4 standards are interior structure, region integration, supporting facilities, and information in Internet. Using the evaluation system and methods, we can realize the quantitative evaluation of ReBAM, and based on the result scores the ReBAM will be classified into 4 developing maturation statuses: embryonic stage, developing stage, approaching maturation stage, and maturation stage. The authors select Beijing city as the case, and divide the Beijing ReBAM into 13 circle-shape regions according to a 10-km distance standard from city center to the farthest edge of ReBAM. On this basis, the authors evaluate the developing maturation status of each circle-shape region using the evaluation system and methods. The evaluation result shows that the Developing Maturation of Beijing ReBAM presents evident spatial differentiation characteristic. In general, the farther it is from the city center, the lower degree of Developing Maturation in the area, but there is also evident waving in the general pattern. The 40-100-km circle-shape regions in Beijing ReBAM are the more active regions in developing, and they will become the major regions for developing in the ReBAM, and tend to maturation.
LI Ren-jie, YANG Zi-ying, SUN Gui-ping, GUO Feng-hua . The evaluation system and methods designed for estimating the developing maturation of recreation belt around metropolises[J]. GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH, 2010 , 29(8) : 1416 -1426 . DOI: 10.11821/yj2010080007
[1] Weaver D B. Model of urban tourism for small Caribbean islands.Geographical Review,1993, 83(2):134.
[2] Ball J V. Landscape preferences and behavior of visitors to Spanish national parks. Landscape and Urban Planning, 1995,(29):145~160.
[3] 苏平,党宁,吴必虎.北京环城游憩带旅游地类型与空间结构特征.地理研究,2004,23(3):403~410.
[4] 俞晟.城市旅游与城市游憩学.上海:华东师范大学出版社, 2003.
[5] 王云才,郭焕成.略论大都市郊区游憩地配置——以北京市为例.旅游学刊,2000(2):54~58.
[6] 秦学.城市游憩空间结构系统分析——以宁波市为例.经济地理,2003,23(2):267~271.
[7] Matsuoka R H, Kaplan R. People needs in the urban landscape: Analysis of landscape and urban planning contributions. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2008, 84(1): 7~19.
[8] Gundersen V S, Frivold L H. Public preferences for forest structures: A review of quantitative surveys from Finland, Norway and Sweden. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2008, 7(4):241~258.
[9] Bernath K, Roschewitz A. Recreational benefits of urban forests: Explaining visitors' willingness to pay in the context of the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Environmental Management, 2008, 89(3):155~166.
[10] Xiang (Robert) Li, Chia-Kuen Cheng, Kim H, et al. A systematic comparison of first-time and repeat visitors via a two-phase online survey. Tourism Management, 2008, 29(2):278~293.
[11] Bilgic A, Florkowski W J, Yoder J, et al. Estimating fishing and hunting leisure spending shares in the United States. Tourism Management, 2008, 29(4): 771~782.
[12] Lange E, Hehl-Lange S, Brewer M J. Scenario-visualization for the assessment of perceived green space qualities at the urban-rural fringe. Journal of Environmental Management, 2008, 89(3):245~256.
[13] Agbenyega O, Burgess P J, Cook M, et al. Application of an ecosystem function framework to perceptions of community woodlands. Land Use Policy, 2009, 26(3):551~557.
[14] Olive N D, Marion J L. The influence of use-related, environmental, and managerial factors on soil loss from recreational trails. Journal of Environmental Management, 2009, 90(3):1483~1493.
[15] Jensen E L, Ouis P. Contested construction of nature for city fringe outdoor recreation in southern Sweden: The Arrie case. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2008, 7(3):171~182.
[16] Butler R. The concept of tourist area cycle of evolution: implications for management of resources. Canadian Geographer, 1980, 14:5~12.
[17] 保继刚.旅游开发研究——原理、方法、实践. 北京:科学出版社, 2000. 294~295.
[18] 保继刚,龙江智.城市旅游驱动力的转化及其实践意义.地理研究,2005,24(2):274~282.
[19] 徐建华.计量地理学.北京:高等教育出版社,2006. 31~32.
[20] 肖光明,郭焕成.珠江三角洲地区旅游资源的基本特征与市域差异.资源科学,2009,31(7):1430~1437.
[21] 李江明,刘承良.武汉环城游憩地空间演变研究.人文地理,2006,21(6):90~96.
[22] 王劲峰.空间分析. 北京:科学出版社, 2006.54~55.
[23] 王云才.论都市郊区游憩景观规划与景观生态保护——以北京市郊区游憩景观规划为例. 地理研究,2003,22(3):324~334.
[24] 牛亚菲, 谢丽波, 刘春凤.北京市旅游客流时空分布特征与调控对策. 地理研究,2005,24(2):283~292.
[25] 李仁杰, 郭风华,安颖. 北京环城游憩地类型结构与自然要素的关系.地理与地理信息科学,2010,26(2):103~106.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |