Culture and Tourism

A study on the symbiotic integrative mechanism of key stakeholders in the transboundary ethnic cultural scenic spot:A case of the scenic spots in Lugu Lake area of Yunnan Province

Expand
  • 1. College of Tourism and Geoscience, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming 650092, China;
    2. Institute of Resources Environment and Earth sciences, Yunnan University, Kunming 650092, China

Received date: 2006-09-10

  Revised date: 2007-05-28

  Online published: 2007-07-25

Supported by

云南省教育厅科学研究基金项目(2004 Y749A )资助

Abstract

Since the present stakeholder theory cannot systematically analyse and resolve the problems concerning the relationship of patterns of interest, organizational forms of coordination, and optimized coordination mechanism and trajortories of the stakeholders, this paper, using stakeholder theory in combination with the symbiotic analytical method, defines the key stakeholders in the transboundary ethnic sultural scenic spots and builds models relating to symbiotic relationship and symbiotic models; and, based on the typical case of the Lugu Lake scenic spots, builds a symbiotic game of chess analysis framework in such a kind of scenic spots. The study indicates that the coordinated application of S-S (stakeholder, symbiosis) theory has stronger power of analysis and explanation to the theoretical analysis and diagnosis of the relationship problems of the key stakeholders already occurred in the scenic spots of tourism so as to provide basis for the integration of conflicts and the establishment of coordination mechanism, and moreover, to explore new channels of the theoretical analysis for solving the problems. Specifically, according to the symbiotic theory, the key stakeholder groups in the scenic spots are defined and, in light of symbiotic conditions of the symbiotic units having quality compatible with parameters (e.g. interest), takes it as symbiotic units among the various hierarchies and identifies the symbiotic relationship among them; and then, in accordance with the various types of behaviors spoiling the public interests existeding in the symbiotic models and imperfections of the organizational forms, combining predesigned profits relatively equilibrium goal (such as from P1 to P4, M1 to M4) matching the improved stage interests of Pareto, it is possible to put forward management strategies and improvement schemes corresponding to the optimized symbiosis for the key stakeholders. In view of the philosophy, contradiction is the internal dynamics and necessary product of objects development.It is just because of the emergence, mitigation and elimination of the contradictions and conflicts as well as their reemergence, remitigation and reelimination in the symbiotic status that makes this process not only keep a reversible state but what is more, makes us find out internal law and mechanism from it. The is of certain theoretical value and profound practical significance to the construction of harmonious society and harmonious culture and getting rid of the "one lake, two management schemes" of Yunnan and Sichuan provinces as well as bidding for world natural and cultural heritage of the Lugu Lake.

Cite this article

WANG Wei-yan, LIN Jin-ping, SHEN Qiong . A study on the symbiotic integrative mechanism of key stakeholders in the transboundary ethnic cultural scenic spot:A case of the scenic spots in Lugu Lake area of Yunnan Province[J]. GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH, 2007 , 26(4) : 673 -684 . DOI: 10.11821/yj2007040004

References



[1] 贾生华,陈宏辉.利益相关者的界定方法述评.外国经济与管理,2002,24(5):13~18.



[2] 周玲.旅游规划与管理中利益相关者研究进展.旅游学刊,2004,(6):53~59.



[3] Fisun Yuksel, Bill Bramwell, Atila Yuksel. Stakeholder interviews and tourism planning at Pamukkale,Turkey .Tourism Management,1999,(3):351~360.



[4] Lindermberg medeirosde Araujo, J Bill Bbramwell. Partnership and regional tourism in Brazil . Annals of Tourism Research,2002,(4):1138~1164.



[5] 保继刚,钟新民.桂林市旅游发展总体规划(2001~2020).北京:中国旅游出版社,2002.



[6] 张伟,吴必虎.利益主体理论在区域旅游规划中的应用——以四川省乐山市为例.旅游学刊,2002,(4):63~68.



[7] 冯淑华.三百山旅游发展中流域利益主体关系的探讨.宜春学院学报(社会科学),2003,25(5):47~50.



[8] 周年兴,俞孔坚,李迪华.风景名胜区规划中的相关利益主体分析——以武陵源风景名胜区为例.经济地理,2005,25(5).



[9] 江海燕,曾丽娟,黄高辉.森林公园规划中相关利益主体的协调与共赢——以东莞市大屏嶂森林公园总体规划为例.广东园林,2005,27(1).



[10] 李正欢,郑向敏.国外旅游研究领域利益相关者的研究综述.旅游学刊,2006,(10):85~90.



[11] Tazim B Jamal, Donald Cetz. Collaboration theory and community tourism planning.Annals of Tourism Research,1995,22(1):186~204.



[12] 袁纯清.共生理论——兼论小型经济.北京:经济科学出版社,1998.1~98.



[13] 郑赤建,苏斌.基于区域利益论的旅游协作问题研究 .桂林:社会科学家,2006,722(6):127~129.



[14] 吴泓,顾朝林.基于共生理论的区域旅游竞合研究——以淮海经济区为例.经济地理,2004,24(1):104~109.



[15] 刘荣增.共生理论及其在我国区域协调发展中的运用.工业技术经济.2006,(25)3:19~21.



[16] 韩芳,帕尔哈提·艾孜木.基于共生理论的区域旅游资源整合的动力机制研究——以南疆五地州旅游资源整合为例.新疆师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2006,(25)3:255~258.



[17] 落水村旅游体制建立的四个阶段.www.chineseactor.cn



[18] 李琼.冲突的构成及其边界——以湖南省S县某事件研究为中心.上海大学博士论文,2005.



[19] Freeman R E. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach.Boston: Pitman Publishing Inc, 1984.



[20] Carroll A B, Buchholtz A K. Business & Society: Ethics and Stakeholder Management.Cincinnati Ohio: Dave Shaut, 1999.



[21] 黄昆.利益相关者共同参与的景区环境模式研究.湖北社会科学,2003,(9):81~82.



[22] 夏赞才.利益相关者理论及旅行社利益相关者基本图谱.湖南师范大学社会科学学报,2003,32(3):72~77.



[23] 王士君,高群,王丹.城市相互作用关系的一种新模式——近域城市整合研究.地理科学,2001,21(6):62~66.



[24] 葛立成,邹益民,聂献忠.中国区域旅游合作问题研究——基于主体、领域和机制的分析.杭州:商业经济与管理,2007,(2):70~75.



[25] 告别"一湖两治"泸沽湖在期待.四川泸沽湖景区网站.www.sclgh.com.



[26] 李文华,闫庆文,孙业红.自然与文化遗产保护中几个问题的探讨.地理研究,2006 25(4):561~569.



[27] 肖薇.泸沽湖景区管理局重奖旅行社.凉山日报(汉),2007-03-06,第001版.
Outlines

/