Research of changing characteristics and control factors of farmland topsoil organic carbon in China
Received date: 2008-11-04
Revised date: 2009-01-27
Online published: 2009-05-25
Supported by
国家自然科学基金国际合作重大项目 (40710019002);安徽省教育厅自然科学重大项目 (ZD2008009-1)
Through collecting 966 samples of measured data of farmland topsoil organic carbon, as well as temperature and precipitation data from 1980 to 2006 of China, this paper analyzed changing characteristics of farmland soil organic carbon of China, discussed the reasons of change and development trends, and analyzed the differences of carbon sequestration ability of the temperature and rainfall on the paddy soil and dry soil, and the affection of temperature and rainfall on the soil organic carbon in different regions. The results show that farmland topsoil organic carbon of measured points presents upward trend overall, with 79% of increase samples mainly concentrated in the rise of 0~3% range. Soil organic carbon content was subject to climatic factors of temperature and precipitation, and the combination of hydrothermal conditions. Over the past 20 years, the distribution patterns of farmland topsoil organic carbon content remains unchanged. The change of farmland soil organic carbon was mainly affected by the impact of human activities. The difference of land use on soil carbon sequestration was significant, the level paddy soil organic carbon was significantly higher than the dry land, and the content of paddy topsoil organic carbon was 175%~176% of that of dry land.
Key words： Farmland Soil; Carbon Sequestration; Control Factors; China
XU Xin-wang, PAN Gen-xing, WANG Yan-lin, CAO Zhi-hong . Research of changing characteristics and control factors of farmland topsoil organic carbon in China[J]. GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH, 2009 , 28(3) : 601 -612 . DOI: 10.11821/yj2009030005
[1] Bruce A McCarl, Ronald D Sands .Competitiveness of terrestrial greenhouse gas offsets: Are they a bridge to the future.Climatic Change, 2007, 80:109~126.
[2] Lal R. Soil carbon sequestration impacts on global climate change and food security. Science,2004, 304: 1623~1627.
[3] Smith P, Martino D, Cai Z, et al. Policy and technological constraints to implementation of greenhouse gas mitigation options in agriculture .Agriculture, Ecosystem & Environment, 2007, 118: 6~28.
[4] 潘根兴,李恋卿,郑聚锋,等. 土壤碳循环研究及中国稻田土壤固碳研究的进展与问题.土壤学报, 2008,45 (5) : 901~914.
[5] Ogle S M, Breidt F J, Paustian K. Agricultural management impacts on soil organic carbon storage under moist and dry climatic conditions of temperate and tropical regions. Biogeochemistry, 2005,72(1):87~121.
[6] Smith Tristram O, West, Johan Six .Considering the influence of sequestration duration and carbon saturation on estimates of soil carbon capacity. Climatic Change,2007,80:25~41.
[7] Lal R. Soil carbon sequestration in China through agricultural intensification, and restoration of degraded and deserified ecosystems. Land Degradation & Development, 2002, 13:469~478.
[8] Pan G X, Li L Q, Wu L S, et al. Storage and sequestration potential of topsoil organic carbon in China's paddy soils. Global Change Biology, 2003, 10: 79~92.
[9] 潘根兴,赵其国. 我国农田土壤碳库演变研究:全球变化和国家粮食安全.地球科学进展,2005,20(4):384~393.
[10] 俞海,黄季焜, Bozelle S. 中国东部地区耕地土壤肥力变化趋势研究. 地理研究,2003,22(3):380~388.
[11] 徐艳, 张凤荣, 汪景宽, 等. 20 年来中国潮土区与黑土区土壤有机质变化的对比研究. 土壤通报, 2004, 35(2): 102~105.
[12] 李长生. 土壤碳储量减少: 中国农业之隐患——中美农业生态系统碳循环对比研究. 第四纪研究, 2000, 20(4): 345~350.
[13] 黄耀,孙文娟.近 20 年来中国大陆农田表土有机碳含量的变化趋势.科学通报,2006,51 (7):750~763.
[14] 黄耀,刘世梁,沈其荣,等. 农田土壤有机碳动态模拟模型的建立. 中国农业科学,2001,34(5): 532~536.
[15] 全国农业技术推广中心.全国耕地土壤监测论文集.北京:中国农业出版社,2003.
[16] 许信旺,潘根兴,侯鹏程.不同土地利用对表层土壤有机碳密度的影响.水土保持学报,2005,19(6):193~197.
[17] 汪景宽,李双异,张旭东,等. 20年来东北典型黑土地区土壤肥力质量变化. 中国生态农业学报,2007,(1):19~24.
[18] 曹宏杰,汪景宽,李双异,等.水热梯度变化及不同施肥措施对东北地区土壤有机碳、氮影响.水土保持学报 2007,21(4):122~125,149.
[19] 阴红彬,韩晓日,谢芳等. 长期定位施肥对棕壤有机碳的影响. 土壤通报,2006,(6).1102~1105.
[20] 许信旺,潘根兴,曹志红,等.安徽省土壤有机碳空间差异及影响因素.地理研究,2007,26(6):1077~1086.
[21] Smith P.An overview of the permanence of soil organic carbon stocks: Influence of direct human-induced, indirect and natural effects.European Journal of Soil Science,2005, 56:673~680.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |