Analysis of the characteristics and spatial differences of urbanization quality of cities at prefecture level and above in China
Received date: 2009-03-07
Revised date: 2009-07-11
Online published: 2009-11-25
Supported by
国家自然科学基金(40671052)
In the 1978~2007 period, the urbanization level in China rose from 17.92% to 44.99, and the urbanization construction has made great progress. With more and more problems related to urbanization emerging, the importance of urbanization quality has been emphasized and many papers have been published in this field. According to the connotation of urbanization quality, the paper constructs the appraisal index system of urbanization quality, including economic development, infrastructure, employment, citizen life, social development, environment, land use quality, innovation quality, and urban-rural gap. With the method of entropy, the urbanization quality of 286 cities at prefecture level and above is analyzed. The results show there are great gaps of urbanization quality between cities, and the urbanization quality is not high as a whole. There is no corresponding relation between urbanization quality and city size, and "The bigger, the better" is not a correct expression concerned with urbanization quality. It is considered that population urbanization level cannot reflect urbanization quality, and that population urbanization is not the ultimate goal. Those cities of higher urbanization quality still have many deficiencies, which needs to be remedied. The spatial differences of urbanization quality are significant, with the urbanization quality decreasing from the eastern coastal regions to central and western regions. The cities of higher urbanization quality are distributed in the form of agglomeration, which fits well the urban agglomerations in China.
HAN Zeng-lin, LIU Tian-bao . Analysis of the characteristics and spatial differences of urbanization quality of cities at prefecture level and above in China[J]. GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH, 2009 , 28(6) : 1508 -1515 . DOI: 10.11821/yj2009060007
[1] 陈彦光,罗静.城市化水平与城市化速度的关系探讨——中国城市化速度和城市化水平饱和值的初步推断.地理研究,2006,25(6): 1063~1072.
[2] 方创琳.改革开放30年来中国的城市化与城镇发展.经济地理,2009,29(1):19~24.
[3] 叶嘉安,徐江,易虹.中国城市化的第四波.城市规划,2006,30(S1):13~18.
[4] 周一星.关于中国城镇化速度的思考.城市规划,2006,30(S1):32~35.
[5] United Nations Human Habitat.The State of the World’s Cities Report 2001.New York:United Nations Publications,2002.116~118.
[6] United Nations Human Habitat.Urban Indicators Guideliners, United Nations Human Settlement Programme.New York:United Nations Publications,2004.8~9.
[7] 叶裕民.中国城市化质量研究.中国软科学,2001,(7):27~31.
[8] 荆刘蕊.中国城市化质量的因子分析.山西统计,2003,(11):9~10.
[9] 赵雪雁.西北地区城市化质量评价.干旱区资源与环境,2004,18(5):69~73.
[10] 国家城调总队福建省城调队课题组.建立中国城市化质量评价体系及应用研究.统计研究,2005,(7):15~19.
[11] 常阿平.我国城市化质量现状的实证分析.统计与决策,2005,(6):49~50.
[12] 郑亚平.我国省域城市化质量水平的测评.重庆工商大学学报,2006,(6):95~98.
[13] 李成群.南北钦防沿海城市群城市化质量分析.改革与战略,2007,(8):107~110.
[14] 赵海燕,王吉恒.黑龙江省城市化质量问题研究.商业研究,2007,(2):86~88.
[15] 张华.城市化质量与数量的协调性分析.边疆经济与文化,2008,(8):10~12.
[16] 孙静,苗洁.河南省城市化质量问题研究.消费导刊,2008,(4): 191.
[17] 袁晓玲,王霄.对城市化质量的综合评价分析——以陕西省为例.城市发展研究,2008,15(2):38~45.
[18] 欧向军,甄峰,秦永东.区域城市化水平综合测度及其理想动力分析——以江苏省为例.地理研究,2008,27(5):993~1002.
[19] 方创琳,Yehua Dennis Wei.河西地区可持续发展能力评价及地域分异规律.地理学报,2001,56(5):561~569.
[20] 乔家君.改进的熵值法在河南可持续发展能力评估中的应用.资源科学,2004,26(1):113~119.
[21] 郭显光.改进的熵值法及其在经济效益评价中的应用.系统工程理论与实践,1998,(12):98~102.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |