The spatial characteristics of the livable city satisfaction degree Index in Beijing
Received date: 2008-11-12
Revised date: 2009-05-20
Online published: 2009-09-25
Supported by
北京市教委科技项目(KM200711417013);北京市优秀人才资助项目(20051D0502210);北京市自然科学基金(8073024)
Based on a questionnaire answered by nearly 10000 people in Beijing, the general characteristics and the spatial auto-correlation of the Livable City Satisfaction Degree Index (LCSDI) were analyzed. In this paper, the way of spatial data analysis, such as spatial correlation analysis and spatial interpolation were used. The overall evaluation of LCSDI in Beijing is 63.8, which means that most of the residents are getting comfort from the livable conditions in Beijing. The spatial distribution of the LCSDI shows that residents in the inner city have a better degree than those living in the suburbs. Sub-districts in the suburbs have obvious difference in LCSDI. Those sub-districts that were planned to be huge residential areas have bad conditions on commute, and their LCSDI is lower than that of those sub-districts with comprehensive functions. To get a better understanding of the spatial pattern of the LCSDI, we used the Moran I to measure the spatial autocorrelation. The results also show that there is spatial autocorrelation in the LCSDI. Those indices related with the natural environment have stronger spatial autocorrelation than those indices related with human resources. The Moran I of LCSDI changes in different scales. The analysis of the spatial heterogeneity of LCSDI indicates that there is a decreasing trend in LCSDI from the center of Beijing to the suburban areas, which is the reflection of urban development in Beijing. As the administrative division is a limitation in the analysis of LCSDI, the Ordinary Kriging was used to model the spatial distribution of LCSDI in Beijing. Based on the spatial interpolation of LCSDI, we can find out some obvious spatial characteristics. The northern parts of Beijing have a better degree than the southern parts. Besides some "cool spots" have obviously lower degree of LCSDI than the neighboring areas, and these "cool spots" are mostly located near the nodes of the transportation. At the same time, some special areas, such as Xiangshan Mountain, make the spatial pattern of LCSDI more complicated.
MENG Bin, YIN Wei-hong, ZHANG Jing-qiu, ZHANG Wen-zhong . The spatial characteristics of the livable city satisfaction degree Index in Beijing[J]. GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH, 2009 , 28(5) : 1318 -1326 . DOI: 10.11821/yj2009050018
[1] 吴良镛, 周干峙, 林志群. 中国建设事业的今天和明天. 北京:城市出版社, 1994.
[2] 吴良镛. 人居环境科学导论. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2001.20.
[3] 尹稚. 论人居环境科学(学科群)建设的方法论思维. 城市规划, 1999, 23(6): 10~14.
[4] 李王鸣, 陈晓平, 陈怡平, 等. 城市人居环境的分析与客观评价. 浙江经济,1999,(7):48~49.
[5] 李雪铭, 姜斌.人居环境:地理学研究面临的一个新课题.地理学与国土研究,2000,16(2):75~78.
[6] 宁越敏, 查志强. 大都市人居环境评价和优化研究.城市规划,1999,23(6): 15~20.
[7] 李王鸣,叶信岳.城市人居环境评价——以杭州城市为例. 经济地理, 1999, 19(2):38~43.
[8] 李雪铭,姜斌.城市人居环境的可持续发展评价研究——以大连市为例.中国人口·资源与环境,2002,12(6):129~131.
[9] 王茂军,张学霞,张文忠. 大连市城市内部居住环境评价的空间结构——基于面源模型的分析. 地理研究, 2002,21(6):87~96.
[10] 徐瑞祥, 蔡龙, 张侠, 等.南京市区人居环境质量评价研究. 现代城市研究, 2003, 18(2):77~81.
[11] 张文忠,刘旺,孟斌,等.北京市区居住环境的区位优势度分析. 地理学报, 2005, 60(1):115~121.
[12] 袁跃.试论宜居城市的判别标准. 经济科学,2005, (4):126~128.
[13] 李丽萍,郭宝华. 关于宜居城市的理论探讨. 城市发展研究,2006, 2(13):76~80.
[14] 张文忠. 城市内部居住环境评价的指标体系和方法. 地理科学,2007,27 (1):17~23.
[15] 张文忠,尹卫红,张景秋,等.中国宜居城市研究报告.北京:社会科学文献出版社,2006.
[16] 张文忠.宜居北京评价的实证研究.北京规划建设,2007,(1):25~30.
[17] Tobler W A. A Computer Movie Simulating Urban Growth in the Detroit Region. Economic Geography, 1970, 46(2): 234~240.
[18] Cliff A, Ord J. Spatial Autocorrelation. Pion, London,1973.
[19] Cliff A, Ord J. Spatial processes: models and applications. Pion, London,1981.
[20] 王劲峰,李连发,葛咏,等. 地理信息空间分析的理论体系探讨.地理学报, 2000, 55(1):92~103.
[21] Matheron G. Kriging , or polynomial interpolation procedures. Canadian Mining and Metallurgical Bulletin, 1967, 60: 1041~1045.
[22] 周一星, 孟延春. 北京的郊区化及其对策. 北京: 科学出版社, 2000.
[23] 冯健,周一星.北京都市区的社会空间结构及其演化(1982~2000). 地理研究,2003,22(4):465~483.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |