The spatial change of urban capital density and its mechanism in China: A case study of Lanzhou
Received date: 2008-03-22
Revised date: 2008-07-28
Online published: 2009-07-25
Supported by
教育部新世纪优秀人才计划、国家自然科学基金项目(40771064)和兰州大学引进人才基金资助
The theoretically spatial distributions of urban capital density of Market Economic Pattern, Command Economic Pattern, and (Chinese) Transforming Economic Pattern from command economy to market economy have been studied and compared. Then, using building cubage rate index, the demonstration of Lanzhou from its districts and different uses of buildings has been done by applying the data based on the high precision satellite image and methods of massive fieldwork lasting more than six months and of GIS technology and maths statistics lasting about 18 months. The conclusions below have been summarized. Firstly, the urban capital density of Market Economic Pattern goes down spatially from their centers to peripheries but one of Command Economic Pattern is balancing or descending slowly or even ascending. However, the trend of urban capital density of (Chinese) Transforming Economic Pattern from command economy to market economy is in the midst of them. Secondly, the urban spatial use of command economy in China presents commerce-residence-industry-agriculture from center to periphery that is greatly different from market economy. Whereas the same pattern still occurs in the period of Chinese Transforming Economic Pattern. Thirdly, the phenomena that high and lower building cubage rates coexist at small space scale widely in Lanzhou are related with difficult changes of land use and lower operation of market economy mechanism and so on. Finally, the trend of spatial distribution pattern of residential and commercial building cubage rates is now close to that of market economy owing to high marketing behavior of both residential building and commercial building where cubage rates are higher than the others.
YANG Yong-chun, LI Xin-jue . The spatial change of urban capital density and its mechanism in China: A case study of Lanzhou[J]. GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH, 2009 , 28(4) : 933 -946 . DOI: 10.11821/yj2009040008
[1] 匡文慧,张树文,张养贞,等.1900年以来长春市土地利用空间扩张机理分析.地理学报,2005,60(5):841~850.
[2] 刘盛和,吴传钧,沈洪泉.基于GIS 的北京城市土地利用扩展模式.地理学报,2000,55(4):407~416.
[3] 徐勇,马国霞,沈洪泉.北京丰台区土地利用变化及其经济驱动力分析.地理研究,2005,24(6):860~868.
[4] 张文忠,王传胜,吕旷,等.珠江三角洲土地利用变化与工业化和城市化的耦合关系.地理学报,2003,58(5):677~685.
[5] 黎夏,叶嘉安.基于神经网络的元胞自动机及模拟复杂土地利用系统.地理研究,2005,24(1):19~27.
[6] 冯健.杭州城市形态和土地利用结构的时空演化.地理学报,2003,58(5):343~353.
[7] 史培军,陈晋,潘耀忠.深圳市土地利用变化机制分析.地理学报,2000,55(2):151~160.
[8] Zhang Liquan, Wu Jianping, Zhen Yu, et al. A GIS-based gradient analysis of urban landscape pattern of Shanghai metropolitan area, China. Landscape and Urban Planning,2004, 69(1):1~16.
[9] 刘盛和,吴传钧,陈田.评析西方城市土地利用的理论研究.地理研究,2001,20(1):111~119.
[10] 朱晓华,蔡运龙.中国土地利用空间分形结构及其机制.地理科学,2005,25(6):671~677.
[11] Sudhira H S, Ramachandra T V, Jagadish K S.Urban sprawl: Metrics, dynamics and modelling using GIS. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 2004,5(1): 29~39.
[12] 闫小培,毛蒋兴.高密度开发城市的交通与土地利用互动关系——以广州为例.地理学报,2004,59(5):643~652.
[13] 叶嘉安.香港的经济结构转型与土地利用规划.地理学报,1997,52(增):39~51.
[14] 闫小培,毛蒋兴,普军.巨型城市区域土地利用变化的人文因素分析——以珠江三角洲地区为例.地理学报,2006,61(6):613~623.
[15] Qing Shen.Spatial technologies, accessibility, and the social construction of urban space.Computers, Environment and Urban Systems,1998, 22(5):447~464.
[16] 王兴中.中国内陆大城市土地利用与社会权力因素的关系——以西安为例.地理学报,1998,53(增):175~185.
[17] 顾朝林,甄峰,张京祥.集聚与扩散-城市空间结构新论.南京:东南大学出版社,2000.3~20.
[18] Véronique Dupont.Socio-spatial differentiation and residential segregation in Delhi: A question of scale.Geoforum,2004,35(2):157~175.
[19] Antrop M.Landscape change and the urbanization process in Europe.Landscape and Urban Planning, 2004,67(1):9~26.
[20] 杨青生,黎夏.基于粗集的知识发现与地理模拟——以深圳市土地利用变化为例.地理学报,2006,61(8):882~894.
[21] Ding Chengri.Managing urban growth for efficiency in infrastructure provision:Dynamic capital expantion and urban growth boundary model.Ph.D.Dissertation,1996.
[22] Mills E S.An aggregative model of resource allocation in a metropolitan area.American Economic Review,1967,57:197~210.
[23] Muth R F.Cities and Housing.Chicago:University of Chicago Press,1969.
[24] Alonso W.Location and Land Use.Cambridge:Harvard University Press,1964.7~53.
[25] Bruechner Jan.The structure of urban equilibria:A unified treatment of the Muth-Mills Model.In: Mills E S(ed. ).Handbook of Reginal and Urban Econimics,Vol.II.Elsevier Science Publisher B V,1987.
[26] 丁成日.土地政策与城市住房发展.城市发展研究,2002,9(2):85~92.
[27] 丁成日.空间结构与城市竞争力.地理学报,2004,59(增):85~92.
[28] 丁成日.中国城市的人口密度高吗?城市规划,2004,199(8):43~48.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |