Sensitivity analysis for primary factors of the forest net primary productivity in Changbaishan Natural Reserve based on process model
Received date: 2007-02-09
Revised date: 2007-11-13
Online published: 2008-03-25
Supported by
科技部项目(2006GB24160430);国家自然科学基金(40571109和40601060);十一五科技支撑项目(2006BAD04B04);国家863计划(2006AA10Z213);成都高原气象研究所开放基金(LPM2007013)
The sensitivity analysis of primary factors affecting the forest Net Primary Productivity (NPP) is important to estimate NPP accurately. In this paper, the sensitivity of NPP to primary parameters of BEPS (boreal ecosystem productivity simulator) was explored using uncertainty and sensitivity matrix (USM) at Changbaishan Natural Reserve in southeast Jilin province, China. Three input parameters for BEPS (leaf area index, temperature and precipitation) were selected for single factor analysis. The analysis was based on an uncertainty and sensitivity matrix with two fixed parameters and the third one was given with a change of +/-5% (or 0.5 degree), +/-10% (or 1 degree) and +/-20% (or 2 degree) respectively. The result shows that in Changbaishan Natural Reserve, forest net primary productivity increases with the increase of LAI, drops with the rise of temperature, and has no obvious relationship with precipitation. The sensitivity analysis of different vegetation classes, including coniferous forest, broadleaf forest and mixed forest, was also done. We find the coniferous forest has a strong adaptability to environment and less effect on the environmental changes. This study was just performed at one of the parameters with pre-setting changes, while the other two parameters are fixed at true values. Definitely, any parameter will respond to the change of other parameter. Hence the net forest primary productivity will change with them. Therefore, in the future, we need to strengthen the research of changing more parameters than one simultaneously to study the sensitivity of NPP to input parameters.
Key words： BEPS; NPP; sensitivity analysis; Changbaishan Natural Reserve
WANG Pei-juan, XIE Dong-hui, ZHANG Jia-hua, ZHU Qi-jiang . Sensitivity analysis for primary factors of the forest net primary productivity in Changbaishan Natural Reserve based on process model[J]. GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH, 2008 , 27(2) : 323 -331 . DOI: 10.11821/yj2008020010
[1] Privette J L, Myneni R B, Emery W J, et al. Optimal sampling conditions for estimating grassland parameters via reflectance model inversions. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing,1996,34(1):272~284.
[2] 李小文, 高峰, 王锦地, 等. 遥感反演中参数的不确定性与敏感性矩阵. 遥感学报,1997,1(1):5~14.
[3] Dufrêne E, Davi H, Franois C, et al. Modelling carbon and water cycles in a beech forest (Part I): Model description and uncertainty analysis on modelled NEE. Ecological Modelling, 2005,185:407~436.
[4] Gastellu-Etchegorry J P, Guillevic P, Zagolski F, et al. Modeling BRF and radiation regime of boreal and tropical forests: I. BRF. Remote Sensing of Environment,1999,68:281~316.
[5] 张霞, 朱启疆, 闵祥军. 陆面温度反演算法——劈窗算法的敏感度分析.遥感学报,2000,4(1):8~13.
[6] 毛克彪, 覃志豪, 宫鹏, 等. 劈窗算法LST精度评价和参数敏感性分析. 中国矿业大学学报,2005,34(3):318~322.
[7] Zhu W, Pan Y, He H, et al. Simulation of maximum light use efficiency for some typical vegetation types in China. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2006,51(4):457~463.
[8] Running S W, Coughlan J C. A general model of forest ecosystem processes for regional applications: I. Hydrologic balance, canopy gas exchange and primary production processes. Ecological Modeling, 1988, 42:125~154.
[9] Liu J, Chen J M, Cihlar J, et al. A process-based boreal ecosystem productivity simulator using remote sensing inputs. Remote Sensing of Environment,1997,62:158~175.
[10] Liu J, Chen, J M, Cihlar J, et al. Net primary productivity distribution in the BOREAS region from a process model using satellite and surface data. Journal of Geophysical Research, 1999, 104(22):27735~27754.
[11] Bonan G B, Pollard D, Thompson S L. Influence of subgrid-scale heterogeneity in leaf area index, stomatal resistance, and soil moisture on grid-scale land-atmosphere interactions. Journal of Climate,1993,6:1882~1897.
[12] Chen J M, Cihlar J. Retrieving leaf area index of boreal conifer forests using Landsat TM images. Remote Sensing of Environment,1996,55:153~162.
[13] Chen J M, Paul M R, Stith T G, et al. Leaf area index of boreal forests: Theory, techniques, and measurements. Journal of Geophysical Research,1997,102(D24):29429~29443.
[14] Potter C S, Wang S, Nikolov N T, et al. Comparison of boreal ecosystem model sensitivity to variability in climate and forest site parameters. Journal of Geophysical Research,2001,106(D24):33671~33688.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |