Change and spatial pattern of flood disaster risk
Received date: 2007-11-12
Revised date: 2008-02-14
Online published: 2008-05-25
Supported by
国家自然科学基金 (40701172) 、高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金资助项目(20070027018) 、淮河流域气象开放研究基金联合资助。
Flood disasters are among the world's most frequent and damaging types of disaster. Flood hazard, flood risk and disasters are the products of an interaction between environmental and social processes. Accurate comprehension of the condition and rule of flood disaster risk change is of critical importance for early warning and flood disaster administering.The study area, situated in the northeast of Kelantan Delta in Malaysia, is the main flood disaster area. In the other papers, the maps and data of flood disaster risk zones and flood risk index have been calculated using the Fuzzy Comprehensive Assessment (FCA) method. In this paper, the condition and rule of risk change in the past decade are analyzed based on risk zone data and risk index data of flood disasters in 1990 and 2000. The risk data of the two phases are overlaid and areas of risk zone changes are summarized. Risk dynamic degree, transition matrix of risk zone change, risk index change, and the mean of change are calculated. Some conclusions are drawn as follows: (1) The variation of risk zones is significant in the spatial pattern and time change from 1990 to 2000. (2) Highest risk zone and higher risk zone are increasing. Moderate risk zone and lower risk zone are decreasing. (3) Conversion among risk zones is lopsided. It is the main reason for the variation taking place in the spatial pattern of risk zones.(4) Mean risk index of 2000 is higher than that of 1990 in the whole area. Risk change is different in the local zones. (5) The change process of flood disaster risk is self-organized and complex. The self-organized character of flood disaster system is significant to reveal the internal universal phenomenon and mechanism.
Key words： flood disaster; risk change; spatial pattern
JIANG Wei-guo, SHENG Shao-xue, ZHU Xiao-hua, ZUO Wei . Change and spatial pattern of flood disaster risk[J]. GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH, 2008 , 27(3) : 502 -509 . DOI: 10.11821/yj2008030003
[1] 蒋卫国. 基于遥感与GIS的洪水灾害风险模糊评估及其演变驱动机制研究.北京师范大学博士论文,2006.16~99.
[2] Ross S Lunetta, Christopher D Elvidge. Remote Sensing Change Detection. Princeton, USA: Taylor and Frances Press. 1999.5~20.
[3] 李德仁.利用遥感影像进行变化检测.武汉大学学报(信息科学版),2003,28:7~12.
[4] 马建文,田国良,王长耀.遥感变化检测技术发展综述.地球科学进展,2004,19(2):192~196.
[5] 赵英时,等.遥感应用分析原理与方法.北京:科学出版社,2003.241~250.
[6] 陈云浩,李小兵,陈晋,史培军. 1983-1992年中国陆地植被NDVI演变特征的变化矢量分析.遥感学报,2002,6(1):12 ~18.
[7] 蒋卫国,陈云浩,李京.中国北方农牧交错带生态环境的空间格局演变.自然资源学报,2005,20(6): 871~878.
[8] 侯西勇,庄大方,于信芳.20世纪90年代新疆草地资源的空间格局演变.地理学报,2004,59(3): 409~417.
[9] Anselmo V, Galeati G, Palmieri S, et al.Flood risk assessment using an integrated hydrological and hydraulic modelling approach: A case study. Journal of Hydrology, 1996,175: 533~554.
[10] Ministry of Civil Defence & Emergency Management. Waiho River Flooding Risk Assessment Report. 2002. 1~51.http://www.civildefence.govt.nz/memwebsite.nsf/Files/MCDEMWaihoRiverRiskAssessment.
[11] Tawatchai Tingsanchali, Mohammed Fazlul Karim.Flood hazard and risk analysis in the southwest region of Bangladesh. Hydrological Process,2005,19:2055~2069.
[12] 赵士鹏.闽江上游地区山洪灾害风险评估.地理研究, 1997, 16(1):98~103.
[13] 黄诗峰,周成虎,万庆,等. 洪水灾害风险评价初析.地理研究, 1998,17(增刊): 71~77.
[14] 周成虎,万庆,黄诗峰.基于GIS的洪水灾害风险区划研究. 地理学报, 2000, 55(1):15~24.
[15] 唐川,朱静.基于GIS的山洪灾害风险区划.地理学报, 2005, 60(1): 87~94.
[16] Department Irrigation and Drainage (DID). National Register of River Basins. Final Report, Volume 2.8, Updating of Condition of Flooding in Malaysia, State Report for Kelantan. 2003.10~35.
[17] 高吉喜, 中村武洋,潘英姿.洪水易损性评价——洞庭湖地区案例研究.北京:中国环境科学出版社,2004.30~60.
[18] 蒋卫国, 王文杰,谢志仁.基于RS和GIS的三江平原湿地景观变化研究.地理与地理信息科学,2003,19(2):28~31.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |