The spatial evaluation of urban residential suitability in Dalian
Received date: 2007-12-03
Revised date: 2008-02-15
Online published: 2008-05-25
Supported by
国家自然科学基金(40571048);国家自然科学基金重点项目(40635026)
In recent years, in order to create a better and more suitable space for living and work, and also for improving the living standard of people continuously, whether a city is amenity city has become the research focus of scholars. Hence attention should be paid to the research on spatial characteristics of urban residential suitability which are still inadequately dealt with.Study on the spatial structure of urban residential suitability and restrict factors has great theoretical and practical significance to urban development programming and city environmental planning. Therefore choosing convenience, health, safety, environment comfort level and convenience of going out to travel as the indexes, questionnaires are designed to investigate the residents who had stable life in Dalian for more than half a year. Then the spatial characteristics of urban residential suitability in Dalian are evaluated by AHP and Q cluster analysis method taking administrative divisions and functional regions as basic unit.And the analysis is based on the data of quantifiable questionnaires.We hope that it can provide reference for the urban construction of Dalian.The following conclusions are drawn: In citizens'opinion, some differences exist in urban residential suitability in different districts,and in downtown, the satisfaction descends gradually from the eastern coastal region to the northwestern urban-rural-integration-area. Comparatively speaking, the urban residential suitability in Zhongshan district is the best contrarily, Ganjingzi district in urban-rural-integration-area is ranked last in urban residential suitability evaluation. And in outer suburbs, urban residential suitability satisfaction in Lushunkou district and development zone is higher than Jinzhou district. At the same time, the result of clustering analysis of different functional regions shows that the area which is political, economic and commercial center of Dalian has the highest score of urban residential suitability; the intersections of urban and rural areas in northwest of the city have the lowest score; although the urban residential suitability in some of the outer suburbs is better, the difference is significant among indicators. On the whole, the score descends gradually from city center to suburbs in spatial pattern and divergences of indexes are also lager. It accords with the result of evaluation on district.
Key words: Dalian; urban; residential suitability; spatial evaluation
REN Xue-hui, LIN Xia, ZHANG Hai-jing, ZHANG Wen-zhong . The spatial evaluation of urban residential suitability in Dalian[J]. GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH, 2008 , 27(3) : 683 -692 . DOI: 10.11821/yj2008030021
[1] 张文忠.宜居北京评价的实证研究.北京规划建设,2007,(1):25~30.
[2] Evans P. Livable cities urban struggles for livelihood and sustainability. California, USA:University of California Press Ltd, 2002.32~34.
[3] Salzano E.Seven aims for the livable city in lennard. S H S von Ungern-Sternberg, H L Lennard(eds.).Making Cities Livable. International Making Cities Livable Conferences. California, USA:Gondolier Press, 1997.22~23.
[4] Timothy D Berg.Reshaping Gotham:The city livable movement and the redevelopment of New York city,1961~1998. Purdue University Graduate School.1998.17~18.
[5] Jian Ge,Hokao Kazunori. Residential environment index system and evaluation model established by subjective and objective methods. Journal of Zhejiang University Science, 2004, 5:1028~1034.
[6] Gideon E.D.Omuta.The quality of urban life and the perception of livability:A case study of neighborhoods in Benin city, Nigeria. Social Indicators Research, 1998, 20(4):25~26.
[7] 顾文选,罗亚蒙.宜居城市科学评价标准.北京规划建设, 2007,(1):7~10.
[8] 楚建群,董黎明.创造良好的城市宜居环境.北京规划建设, 2007,(1):15~17.
[9] 张文忠.宜居城市的内涵及评价指标体系探讨.城市规划学刊, 2007,(3):30~34.
[10] 刘维新.以"三大标准"看北京宜居之路.北京规划建设, 2007,(1):46~47.
[11] 周志田,等.中国适宜人居城市研究与评价.中国人口资源与环境, 2004,(1):27~29.
[12] 张文忠. 城市内部居住环境评价的指标体系和方法. 地理科学, 2007,l27(1):17~23.
[13] 陈静,尹卫红,张景秋.宜居城市与北京城市宜居性评价.北京联合大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2006, 4(2):15~19.
[14] 张文忠,尹卫红,张景秋,等.中国宜居城市研究报告.北京:社会科学文献出版社, 2006.15~18.
[15] 李丽萍,吴祥裕.宜居城市评价指标体系研究.中共济南市委党校学报, 2007,(1):16~21.
[16] 李雪铭,刘巍巍.城市居住小区环境归属感评价——以大连市为例.地理研究, 2006, 25(5):785~791.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |