Earth Surface Processes

Spatio-temporal pattern of land use change and its eco-environmental response in Suzhou-Wuxi-Changzhou Region

Expand
  • School of Geographic and Oceanographic Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China

Received date: 2007-08-05

  Revised date: 2008-01-19

  Online published: 2008-05-25

Supported by

国家自然科学基金项目(40371106);江苏省研究生科研创新计划 (CX07B _042z);江苏省自然科学基金项目(KB2005080)。

Abstract

The Suzhou-Wuxi-Changzhou(S-X-C)region is one of the hottest spots for socio-economic development in China, the land use change and corresponding eco-environmental problems have intensified further. Taking 12 county-level cities and districts of the region as study units, the spatio-temporal distribution characteristics were revealed and eco-environmental situation was evaluated, based on Landsat TM data in 1980, 1995, 2000 and relevant statistical and investigation data on eco-environment. Further, this paper mainly analyzes the eco-environmental responses to spatio-temporal distribution of land use change. Results of the study show: (1) The dominant types of land use change from 1980 to 2000 are the land expansion for urban onstruction purpose and sharp decrease of cultivated land. The conversion of paddy fields to urban and rural construction land dispersed in every unit. However, the conversion of other different land types relatively concentrated in several main units. And the number of dominant types of land use change more from was greater 1995 to 2000 than that 15 yearsago. (2) As an index used to measure land use diversity, Dj showed that there were different land use structure in every unit, and the diversity degree between every two units was different but the difference showed a tendency of decreasing. The information entropy of land use structure was used to weigh land use system orderliness. On the one hand, it showed that land use system tended to be more and more disordered in the majority of units, on the other hand, the disordered degree becomes gredter more obvious with the development of society and economy. In addition, the index V indicated the similar character of land use change rate with land use system orderliness. (3) Eco-environmental situation tended to deteriorate gradually in most units, especially in the recent five years (1995-2000). There were distinct and different eco-environmental responses to land use change and its spatio-temporal distribution. The phenomenon was more outstanding in the main units of land use change. (4)In different units, the eco-environmental status responded differently to the orderliness and comprehensive change rate of land use. Moreover, the response and its differentiation increased to different degrees with the change of land use. In general, the paper emphasizes the response of eco-environment to land use change and its spatio-temporal distribution characteristics. It puts forward suggestions concerning the adjustment of land use planning, industrial policy and the optimization of land use pattern and improvement of land use mode, on the basis of simulation and prediction of land use change and its possible eco-environmental response.

Cite this article

TU Xiao-song, PU Li-jie . Spatio-temporal pattern of land use change and its eco-environmental response in Suzhou-Wuxi-Changzhou Region[J]. GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH, 2008 , 27(3) : 583 -594 . DOI: 10.11821/yj2008030012

References


[1] Barney Cohen.Urban growth in developing countries:A review of current trends and a caution regarding existing forecasts.World Development, 2004, 32(1):23~51.

[2] 刘盛和, 何书金.土地利用动态变化的空间分析测算模型.自然资源学报, 2002, 17(5):533~540.

[3] Martin Herold, Helen Couclelis, Keith Clarke.The role of spatial metrics in the analysis and modeling of urban land use change.Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 2005, 29(4):369~399.

[4] 田光进, 刘纪远, 庄大方, 等.基于遥感与GIS的20世纪90年代中国城镇用地时空特征.第四纪研究, 2003,23(4):421~427.

[5] Weber C Puissant A Urbanization pressure and modeling of urban growth: Example of the Tunis metropolitan area.Remote Sensing of Environment, 2003, 86(3):341~352.

[6] 宗跃光, 王蓉, 汪成刚, 等.城市建设用地生态适宜性评价的潜力—限制性分析——以大连城市化区为例.地理研究, 2007, 26(6):1117~1127.

[7] 刘彦随, 彭留英, 陈玉福.东北地区土地利用转换及其生态效应分析.农业工程学报, 2005, 21(11):175~178.

[8] 莫宏伟, 任志远, 谢红霞.农牧交错区土地利用动态与生态效应变化——以榆阳区为例.干旱区地理, 2005, 28(3):352~356.

[9] 吕昌河, 贾克敬, 冉圣宏, 等.土地利用规划环境影响评价指标与案例.地理研究, 2007,26(2):249~257.

[10] 喻峰, 李晓兵, 王宏, 等.皇甫川流域土地利用变化与生态安全评价.地理学报, 2006, 61(6):645~653.

[11] 蒋勇军, 袁道先, 章程, 等.典型岩溶农业区土地利用变化对土壤性质的影响——以云南小江流域为例.地理学报, 2005, 60 (5):751~760.

[12] 吕晓芳, 王仰麟, 张镱锂, 等.宁夏中部生态脆弱区土地利用变化及沙漠化响应——以宁夏盐池县为例.地理研究, 2007, 26(6):1157~1166.

[13] 李晓兵, 陈云浩, 王宏, 等.中国土地覆盖动态变化幅度的区域分异规律.地理科学, 2004, 24(3):271~275.

[14] 万荣荣, 杨桂山.太湖流域土地利用变化及其空间分异特征研究.长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(3):298~303.

[15] 索安宁, 巨天珍, 熊友才, 等.泾河流域土地利用区域分异与驱动力的关系.中国水土保持科学, 2006, 4 (6):75~80.

[16] 王静爱, 徐霞, 刘培芳.中国北方农牧交错带土地利用与人口负荷研究.资源科学,1999, 21(5):19~25.

[17] 郑袁明, 罗金发, 陈同斌, 等.北京市不同土地利用类型的土壤镉含量特征.地理研究, 2005, 24(4):542~548.

[18] 史培军, 刘宝元, 张科利, 等.土壤侵蚀过程与模型研究.资源科学, 1999, 21(5):9~18.

[19] 龚建周, 夏北成.1990年以来广州市土地覆被景观时空梯度分异.地理学报, 2007, 62(2):181~190.

[20] 白艳莹, 王效科, 欧阳志云, 等.苏锡常地区生态足迹分析.资源科学, 2003, 25(6):31~37.

[21] 周峰, 濮励杰, 彭补拙.苏锡常地区土地利用变化及其绩效分析.自然资源学报, 2006, 21(3):392~400.

[22] 谭永忠, 吴次芳.区域土地利用结构的信息熵分异规律研究.自然资源学报, 2003, 18(1):112~117.

[23] 陈彦光, 刘继生.城市土地利用结构和形态的定量描述:从信息熵到分数维.地理研究, 2001, 20 (2):146~152.

[24] 傅伯杰, 陈利顶, 马克明.黄土丘陵区小流域土地利用变化对生态环境的影响——以延安市羊圈沟流域为例.地理学报, 1999, 54(3):241~246.

[25] 虞孝感, 陈雯.城市更新与区域经济发展——以苏锡常为例.城市问题, 1995, 1:25~30.

Outlines

/