The research on basin ecological security in historical period: Taking Upper Fenhe River as a case
Received date: 2007-11-15
Revised date: 2008-03-11
Online published: 2008-05-25
Supported by
国家自然科学基金资助项目(40471033)
This article chooses the upper reaches of Fenhe River, which is an eco-fragile region, as the study area. Using "series cross profile" and "pressure-state-response" framework model, this article explores the main problem of the basin's ecological security in historical period. The study indicates that, in line with the social production in historical period, both human capacity to intervene on the environment and the ability to respond to environmental changes are low, hence presenting a fluctuation in ecological security in the historical period; research on the basin ecological security, the cultivated land quantity, the plantation quantity, the level of stock raising, the state's policies, the war frequency and so on in eco-fragile regions in historical periods should be the main indexes; in the "pressure-state-response" evaluation system, the pressure factor and the state factor indexes decreased, while the response factor indexes increased; and the emergence of civil control behavior proves the intensification of the ecological evolution from the other aspect. This paper restores and discusses the evolution state of ecological security of the upper reaches of Fenhe River in historical period. It is necessary for us to do more researches about how to quantify the ecological thresholds in different stages, and how to judge the ecological safety.
Key words： historical stage; basin; appraisal of ecological security
WANG Shang-yi, ZHANG Hui-zhi, MA Yi-juan, MENG Wan-zhong . The research on basin ecological security in historical period: Taking Upper Fenhe River as a case[J]. GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH, 2008 , 27(3) : 556 -564 . DOI: 10.11821/yj2008030009
[1] 陈星,周成虎.生态安全:国内外研究综述.地理科学进展,2005,24(6):8~24.
[2] 张慧芝,王尚义,曹志敏.流域生态安全研究的历史阶段划分——以汾河上游为例,太原师范学院学报(自然科学版),2007,6(3):1~6.
[3] 师忠东.汾河水污染控制研究.山西能源与节能,2005,38(3):28,29.
[4] 牛俊杰.赵景波.王尚义.汾河流域上游人工林地深层土壤干燥化探讨.地理研究,2007,26 (3):773~781.
[5] 李素清.张金屯.山西云顶山亚高山草甸群落生态分析. 地理研究,2007,26 (3):83~90.
[6] 王尚义,任世芳,孟万忠.六百年来汾河上游人口压力增长与环境状态演变之关系.地理研究,2007,26 (3):452~458.
[7] 陈国阶.论生态安全.重庆环境科学,2002,24(3):1~18.
[8] 曲格平.关注生态安全之一:生态环境问题已经成为国家安全的热门话题.环境保护,2002,(5):3~5.
[9] 杨京平 主编.生态安全的系统分析.北京:化学工业出版社,环境科学与工程出版中心,2002.131~132,129.
[10] 肖笃宁,陈文波,郭福良.论生态安全的基本概念和研究内容.应用生态学报,2002,13(3):354~358.
[11] Peter C, Schnlze. Overview: Measures of Environmental Performance and Ecosystem Condition. Washington DC: National Academy Press,1999.
[12] 王尚义,张慧芝.历史时期汾河上游生态环境演变研究——重大事件及史料编年.山西人民出版社, 2008.1.
[13] 邓辉,试论区域历史地理研究的理论和方法——兼论北方农牧交错带地区的历史地理综合研究.北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2001,38(1):117~123.
[14] 葛剑雄,华林甫.二十世纪的中国历史地理研究.历史研究,2002(3):145~165.
[15] 陈东景,徐中民.西北内陆河流域生态安全评价研究——以黑河流域中游张掖地区为例.干旱区地理,2002,25(3):219~224.
[16] 史念海.司马迁所规划的农牧地区分界线在黄土高原上的推移及其影响(下).中国历史地理论丛,1999,(3):219~224.
[17] 张海瀛.张居正改革与山西万历清丈研究.太原:山西人民出版社,1993.附录.
[18] 史念海.河山集第三集.上海:三联书店,1963.68.
[19] 钱穆.中国历代政治得失.北京:商务印书馆,2001.122.
[20] 葛剑雄 主编.中国人口史第一卷.上海:复旦大学出版社,2002.372,373.
[21] 李三谋.清代晋北农业概述.古今农业,1998,(1):10~16.
[22] 中国社会科学院考古研究所实验室.放射性碳素测定年代报告(五).
[23] 史念海.黄土高原历史地理研究.郑州:黄河水利出版社,2002.
[24] 娄烦县志.北京:中华书局,1999.234.
[25] 翟旺,杨丕文.管涔山林区森林与生态变迁史.太原:山西高校联合出版社,1994.93.
[26] 山西林业调查资料.中外经济周刊,1924(民国十三年).
[27] 安介生.清代山西境内"客民"刍议.晋阳学刊,1998,(6):90~95.
[28] 王尚义,张慧芝.明清时期汾河流域生态环境演变与民间控制.民俗研究,2006,(3):126~138.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |