The dynamic changes of ecological security in northern China
Received date: 2007-10-11
Revised date: 2008-03-03
Online published: 2008-09-25
Supported by
重庆市教育委员会科学技术研究项目(KJ070811);重庆师范大学博士科研启动基金(06XLB004);中国科学院杰出海外学者基金(2001-1-13)
Regulation and rebuilding of landscape structure are the keys to redevelop the regional safe ecological pattern. The eco-environment of the 13 provinces in northern China is relatively fragile. In order to understand the eco-environment feedback mechanism and seek a way to optimize landuse/cover spatial pattern under ecological security, the temporal and spatial dynamic changes of the ecological security in northern China during the 11-year period from 1989 to 1999 is analyzed based on the landscape ecology theoretic, semivariogram and GIS in this paper. The results show that: (1)The eco-environmental quality in the study area showed an obvious decreasing trend. The eco-environmental quality in the areas with high ecological security decreased more slowly on the whole. The main reasons are that the eco-environment is better,flexible and steady. So it has higher capability to resist the outside disturbances. (2)The level of ecological security in the east region was more secure than that in the west and central regions.For each sub-region, the level of ecological security in Northwest China was the lowest; Inner Mongolia was secondly; Shaanxi and Shanxi provinces that lie in the Loess Plateau were in the third place; North China was higher than the above three sub-regions; and the three provinces in Northeast China were the highest. (3)The changes of the indexes of ecological security could be divided into three types: ①the indexes of the level of ecological security increased firstly and then decreased, including Beijing, Liaoning, Shanxi and Qinghai; ②the indexes of the level of ecological security decreased and then increased, including Heilongjiang, Jilin, Inner Mongolia, Ningxia; ③the indexes of the level of ecological security decreased continuously, including Tianjin, Hebei, Shaanxi, Gansu, and Xinjiang. During the ten years, the levels of ecological security decreased at different speeds except Northeast China.
LI Yue-chen . The dynamic changes of ecological security in northern China[J]. GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH, 2008 , 27(5) : 1150 -1161 . DOI: 10.11821/yj2008050018
[1] 肖笃宁. 景观生态学:理论、方法及应用. 北京:中国林业出版社, 1991.
[2] Turner M G. Landscape ecology: The effect of pattern on process. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1989, 20: 171~197.
[3] 刘彦随,陈百明.中国可持续发展问题与土地利用/覆盖变化研究.地理研究, 2002, 21(3): 324~330.
[4] Costanza R, Norton B G, Haskell B D.Ecosystem Health: New Goal for Environmental Management. Washington D C: Island Press, 1992.
[5] Dobson, Andy P, et al. Hopes for the future: Restoration ecology and conservation ecology. Science, 1997, 277:515~524.
[6] 肖笃宁,陈文波,郭福良.论生态安全的基本概念与研究方法.应用生态学报, 2002,13(3):354~358.
[7] FAO Proceedings. Land Quality Indicators and Their Use in Sustainable Agriculture and Rural Development, Proceedings of the Workshop organized by the Land and Water Development Division FAO Agriculture Department, 1997, 2:5
[8] Tran L T, Knight C G, O’Nell R V, et al. Fuzzy decision analysis for integrated environmental vulunerability assessment of the Mid-Atlantic region. Environmental Management, 2002, 29(6):845~859.
[9] Rees W E. Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity: What urbun economics leaves out. Environ. Urban. , 1998,4:121~130.
[10] 杨庆媛.西南丘陵山地区土地整理与区域生态安全研究.地理研究, 2003, 22(6):698~708.
[11] 曾辉,刘国军. 基于景观结构的区域生态风险分.中国环境科学, 1999, 19(5):454~457.
[12] 王根绪,程国栋,钱鞠.生态安全评价研究中的若干问题.应用生态学报, 2003,14(9):1551~1556.
[13] 陈鹏,潘晓玲.干旱区内陆河流域区域景观生态风险分析.生态学杂志, 2003,22(4):116~120.
[14] Tobias P, Fernando J P, Harald S. Effects of land-use and landscape structure on holm oak recruitment and regeneration at farm level in Quercus iexL. Dehesas. Journal of Arid Environments,2004,57:345~364.
[15] 李晓燕,张树文.基于景观结构的吉林西部生态安全动态分析.干旱区研究, 2005,22(1):57~62.
[16] 张浩,汤晓敏,王寿兵,等.珠江三角洲快速城市化地区生态安全研究——以佛山市为例.自然资源学报,2006,21(4):615~624.
[17] 郭明,肖笃宁,李新.黑河流域酒泉绿洲景观生态安全格局分析.生态学报, 2006,26(2):457~466.
[18] 刘明华, 董贵华. RS和GIS支持下的秦皇岛地区生态系统健康评价. 地理研究, 2006,25(5):930~938.
[19] 马克明, 傅伯杰, 黎晓亚, 等.区域生态安全格局:概念与理论基础.生态学报, 2004,24(4):761~768.
[20] 欧阳志云, 王效科, 苗鸿.中国生态环境敏感性及其区域差异规律研究.生态学报, 2000,20(1):9~12.
[21] 李克让,曹明奎,於俐,等.中国自然生态系统对气候变化的脆弱性评估.地理研究, 2005,24(5):653~663.
[22] 史培军, 宋常青, 景贵飞.加强我国土地利用/覆盖变化及其对生态环境安全影响的研究.地球科学进展, 2002,17(2):161~168.
[23] 李月臣. 中国北方土地利用/覆盖变化问题研究.北京师范大学博士论文,2006.
[24] 许学工,林辉平,付在毅,等. 黄河三角洲湿地区域生态风险评价.北京大学学报(自然科学版), 2001,37(1):111~120.
[25] 王政权. 地统计学及在生态学中的应用. 北京:科学出版社, 1999.
[26] 郭旭东,傅伯杰,陈利顶,等.河北省遵化平原土壤养分的时空变异特征——变异函数与Kriging插值分析.地理学报, 2000, 55(5):555~566.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |