Perspectives on the cultural heritage conservation and development
Received date: 2005-01-06
Revised date: 2005-05-18
Online published: 2005-08-15
The contradiction between economic development and cultural heritage conservation is common everywhere. On the one hand, tourism can not be developed at the cost of destroying rare cultural relics while on the other , we shouldn't stop developing tourism for the sake of cultural heritage conservation.Here we reiterated the "China Policy", which is the requirement for fulfilling human culture succession and sustainable development. In grotto culture protection, some problems have been solved, such as the harm of crowded people to fresco and painted sculpture, wind and sand erosion, etc. But there are many other social and natural environmental problems, one of which is the erosion of flood to the base of grotto. Ancient city sites are helpful for paleo-environmental reconstruction. The abundant information from archeological excavation, together with natural environmental change and culture spreading, might contribute to a new way to explain and demonstrate ancient cultures. Explaining the enigmas of many ancient city sites also need to start with virtual paleo-environment. The reconstruction of old buildings should follow the principle of "repair as their origins". Besides, adapting the old buildings to modern environmental and ecological functions should also be considered. New technology and material can be used in some cases. There are several successful examples of applications of remote sensing monitoring to archeological excavation and cultural heritage conservation. We suggested that grid technology used in the field of archeology should be further popularized. And multi-level grid management information systems should be built up to improve cultural heritage conservation and development.
CHEN Shu-peng, HUANG Chong . Perspectives on the cultural heritage conservation and development[J]. GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH, 2005 , 24(4) : 489 -498 . DOI: 10.11821/yj2005040001
[1] 李雅萍,吴佳佳.别让“开发”毁了世界遗产.经济时报,2004-6-26(2).
[2] 新华社.中国保护世界遗产进步巨大.人民日报(海外版),2004-6-28(4).
[3] 朱迪丝,H.罗布任斯基.步履蹒跚的文化演变.(美)纽约时报,2004-7-15.
[4] 竹腰雅彦.中国担心文化遗产资格被取消.参考消息,2004-7-26(8).
[5] 胡锦涛.世界遗产大会贺辞.人民日报(海外版),2004-6-29(3).
[6] 秦京午.世界地质公园大会开幕.人民日报(海外版),2004-6-28(4).
[7] 荣新江.敦煌学十八讲.北京:北京大学出版社,2001.
[8] 王艳明.我国专家发现莫高窟被破坏的主要原因.科学时报,2004-7-28(2).
[9] 曹海英,张莹.保护敦煌遗书.人民日报(海外版),2004-6-25(8).
[10] 柴福善.魏碑精品在龙门.人民日报(海外版),2004-7-24(8).
[11] 李一氓.中国古代文化史讲座.南宁:广西师范大学出版社,2003.
[12] 侯外庐.中国古代社会史论.石家庄:河北教育出版社,2003.
[13] 席泽宗.科学史十讲.上海:复旦大学出版社,2003.
[14] 杨宝成.殷墟文化研究.武汉:武汉大学出版社,2002.
[15] 李学勤.中国古代文明十讲.上海:复旦大学出版社,2003.
[16] 江林易.夏商周文明初探.杭州:浙江大学出版社,2002.
[17] 赵华.细数近期考古重大发现.人民日报(海外版),2004-6-15(5).
[18] 陈德安.古蜀王国的圣地.成都:四川人民出版社,2003.
[19] 苏三.三星堆文化大猜想.北京:中国社会科学院出版社,2004.
[20] 刘少匆.三星堆文化探秘及《山海经》断想.北京:昆仑出版社,2001.
[21] 赵晓辉,韩乔.布达拉宫,维修不损文物价值.人民日报(海外版),2004-7-24(4).
[22] 丁肇文,周明杰.北京历史文化名城保护有法可依.北京晚报,2004-7-31(2).
[23] 徐城北.永定门城楼复建记.北京青年报,2004-6-18(B2).
[24] 边江,冯国.周公庙遗址考古用上高科技.人民日报,2004-6-26(4).
[25] 郭华东.城市与考古,中国雷达遥感图像分析.北京:科学出版社,1999.
[26] 孟昭凯.牛河梁,红山文化遗址———中国世界文化遗产预备项目.人民日报(海外版),2004-6-30(8).
[27] 唐克美.贺兰山岩画的保护措施亟待加强.北京盟讯,2004-6,6(4).
[28] 李雅萍.高句丽让世遗名录更丰富1经济日报,2004-7-3(2).
[29] 吴惠民.无锡惠山祠堂群.人民日报(海外版),2004-6-30(8).
[30] 桂娟.二里头遗址发现夏代车辙.光明日报,2004-7-21(4).
[31] 谢连文,李降,邓国武.罗布泊盐湖古环境信息遥感研究方法1遥感信息,2003,(4):2～4.
[32] 屠傲凌.地面核磁共振测深法首次应用于考古.科学时报,200425218(B4).
[33] 徐剑梅.英国如何善待“长城”.参考消息,2004-7-1(10).
[34] 王俪阎.夏传九鼎之谜.人民日报(海外版),2004-7-24(8).
[35] 罗哲文.访墨西哥的世界遗产1现代城市研究,2004,(6):30～31.
[36] Italy-United State Workshop1 The Reconstruction of Archaeological Landscapes t hrough Digital Technologies1Boston,MA,USA. Nov.1-3,2001,(第216次香山科学会议,交流材料,P192-213).
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |