Study on the feature of tourism perspective of rural residents:taking Hunan Province as a case
Received date: 2004-10-08
Revised date: 2005-04-01
Online published: 2005-08-15
Based on sampling surveys of 1,200 rural residents with questionnaires in Liuyang city, Huarong county, Xinling county and Fenghuang county of Hunan province from2001 to 2003, this paper makes a detailed analysis of the tourism perspectives on the 1,077 effective samples. Some conclusions are drawn as follows: In Hunan, more and more rural residents become to know tourism while only 1.9% of the samples "never heard about" tourism. However, there is difference in the four survey regions. In Liuyang and Fenghuang, rural residents know more tourism knowledge than the other two regions, because tourism has long been developed there. Rural residents have positive attitudes to tourism in Hunan. Most of them accept tourism as a product, but there are different tourism perspectives among different age groups and different regions in the province. The tourism assent rate related to residents gained from tourism. The residents' assent rate is higher in Fenghuang than the other regions, and the rate is the lowest in Huarong. Tourism motivation of rural residents is multiplicity, but their purpose of touring is simple. Tourism hobbies of rural residents are affected by age and economic level. Especially, in Hunan, tourism hobbies of rural residents are inclined to sightseeing and learning-technology tour. Scenic spots are the most popular sites for rural residents, and big cities and eastern region are other tourism destinations of the rural residents. Most of the rural residents have a desire to go out for travel. Rural residents have abundant and centralized time for travel, whereas their budgetary outlay is normally higher than their actual expenditure. Especially, the older residents are inclined to choose 2~7 days tour, but the youngsters are inclined to 4~7 days or over 7 days tour. The main limited factors for rural residents' touring are income, and farming season and housework are the limited factors for young and middle-aged rural residents. However, the older residents are worried about the security and traffic conditions. And the subjective factors including in-comprehend tourism and the negative effect.
ZHENG Qun-ming, ZHONG Lin-sheng . Study on the feature of tourism perspective of rural residents:taking Hunan Province as a case[J]. GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH, 2005 , 24(4) : 591 -600 . DOI: 10.11821/yj2005040014
[1] 郭焕成,等主编1海峡两岸观光休闲农业与乡村旅游发展.北京:中国矿业大学出版社,2004.
[2] 裴泽生.关于开发我国农村旅游市场的几点思考.旅游调研,2002,(6):25~28.
[3] 中华人民共和国国家旅游局.中国旅游年鉴2003.北京:中国旅游出版社,20041 33.
[4] 孙富海.农村的旅游市场开发.外向经济,1998,(2):43~45.
[5] 周燕,李祝舜.我国农民旅游市场开发初探.旅游学刊,2004,19(4):23~27.
[6] 张朋,曹新向,梁留科.关于开发农村居民旅游市场的思考.西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版),2004,4(1):19~23.
[7] Lankford S V,Howard D R.Developing a tourism impact at tit ude scale.Journal of Travel Research,1994,21(1):121~139.
[8] Johnson J D,Snepenger D J,Akis S.Resident s,perceptions of tourism develop ment.Annals of Tourism Research,1994,21(3):629~642.
[9] 章锦河.古村落旅游地居民旅游感知分析———以黟县西递为例.地理与地理信息科学,2003,19(2):105~109.
[10] 吴忠宏,洪常明,钟林生.居民对生态旅游认知与态度之研究:以澎湖列岛为例.旅游学刊,2005,20(1):57~62.
[11] 丁健,等.广州市居民出境旅游行为.地理研究,2004,23(5):705~714.
[12] 杨学燕,金海龙.居民出游决策行为与家庭结构的关系探讨———以宁夏回族自治区为例.旅游学刊,2004,19(4):14~18.
[13] 苏勤,等.基于态度与行为的我国旅游居民地的类型划分—以西递、周庄、九华山为例.地理研究,2004,23(1):104~114.
[14] 李燕琴,等.北京市生态旅游者的行为特征调查与分析—以百花山自然保护区为例.地理研究,2004,23(6):863~874.
[15] Ap J,Cro mpton J L.Resident s’st rategies for responding to tourism impact s.Journal of Travel Research,1993,32(1):47~50.
[16] 魏小安.中国“三农旅游”的发展.见:张广瑞,等主编.2003-2005中国旅游发展:分析与预测.北京:社会科学文献出版社,2005.
[17] 湖南省统计局编.湖南统计年鉴2002.北京:中国统计出版社,2002.81,403~405.
[18] 杨载田主编.中国旅游地理.北京:科学出版社,1999.260~268.
[19] 郑群明,贺小荣,陈耿.农村居民闲暇生活特征研究———以湖南省为例.人文地理,2004,19(1):17~21.
[20] 保继刚.旅游者行为研究.见:保继刚,等.旅游开发研究.北京:科学出版社,19961 49.
[21] 刘振礼,王兵.新编中国旅游地理.第二版1天津:南开大学出版社,20011 21.
[22] 国家旅游局政策法规司,等编.中国国内旅游抽样调查资料2002.北京:中国旅游出版社,20021 9,112,133.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |