Earth Surface Processes

Studies on the fractal structure of point-axis systems with spatial complexity

Expand
  • 1. Department of Geography, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China;
    2. Department of Geography, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China;
    3. Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China

Received date: 2002-11-10

  Revised date: 2003-03-31

  Online published: 2003-08-15

Abstract

Studies are preliminarily made on spatial structure of point-axis systems in the paper, which reveal that a point-axis system as a unique giant component (UGC) is in fact a fractal system. The theoretical starting point of the point-axis model in the aspect of spatial patterns is the triangular lattice that is the same as that of central place theory, but the configuration of developed point-axis systems is of irregularity based on random process to a certain extent. On the other hand, the point-axis model is as advanced as a new optimization design which signifies that an ideal point-axis system must have some kinds of optimum structure, especially the spatial structure with some kinds of ‘order’, the order may be what is called self-similarity that is always emerging ‘at the edge of chaos’ which is mathematically related to the concept of ‘self-organized criticality’. In reality a point-axis system usually appears concretely as an urban system depending on one or two ‘axes’such as seaboard, great rivers, railways and so on, and systems of cities and towns proved to be fractal systems. This implies that point-axis systems may have fractal structure. From the viewpoint of a general dynamic system that can be used to describe point-axis systems, an allometric growth equation is deduced out as x i ∝ x jα , from which, the relationship between measures and yardsticks of point-axis systems, M ( r )∝ r D , can be derived by means of the theorem of ergodicity. According to the measure-scale relationship, two kinds of fractal dimensions can be given to characterize point-axis systems. One is the point-distribution dimension that is defined by the formula N ( r )∝ r D , where r is a yardstick, N ( r ) is corresponding number of points in a point-axis system and D is fractal dimension. The other is the line-distribution dimension that can be defined by the formula L ( r )∝ r D , where L ( r ) is length of communication lines joining points together corresponding the yardstick r . In addition, the line-distribution dimension can also be defined by number of branches of the network of communication lines linking one point with another. The four growth stages of point-axis systems are reinterpreted using ideas from fractals, and theoretical results are applied to the system of cities and towns in North Henan including three urban subsystems. It is demonstrated and illustrated that the urban system as a UGC has fractal dimensionality, which only goes to prove that the hypothesis of self-similar point-axis system is correct empirically. A least squares computation of the quantities gives the values of the fractal dimension D =2.387 with a determination coefficient of 0.996 for Zhengzhou subsystem, D =1.747 with a determination coefficient of 0.997 for Kaifeng subsystem, and D =1.659 with a determination coefficient of 0.997 for Luoyang subsystem. As for the system on the whole, D =1.715 with a goodness of fit of 0.999. The results bring to light a great deal of temporal-spatial information on the development and evolution patterns of the point-axis system in Central Plains.

Cite this article

LIU Ji-sheng, CHEN Yan-guang, LIU Zhi-gan3 . Studies on the fractal structure of point-axis systems with spatial complexity[J]. GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH, 2003 , 22(4) : 447 -454 . DOI: 10.11821/yj2003040007

References


[1] 陆大道.区位论及区域研究方法.北京:科学出版社,1988.101~102.
[2] 陆玉麒.论点轴系统理论的科学内涵.地理科学,2002,22(2):136~143.
[3] 林鸿溢,李映雪.分形论———奇异性探索.北京:北京理工大学出版社,1992.45~46.
[4] Bossomaier T,Green D.沙地上的图案:计算机、复杂和生命.陈禹,等,译.南昌:江西教育出版社,1999.
[5] 陈彦光,刘继生.城市系统的异速生长关系与位序-规模法则———对Steindl模型的修正与发展.地理科学,2001,21(4):412~416.
[6] Batt y M,Longley P A.Fractal Cities:A Geometry of Form and Function1 London:Academic Press,Harcourt Brace&Company,Publishers,1994.44~45.
[7] Arlinghaus S. Fractals take a central place1 Geografiska Annaler,1985,67B,(2):83~881
[8] 陆大道.区域发展及其空间结构.北京:科学出版社,1995.137~141.
[9] Bak P. How Nature Works:t he Science of Self2Organized Criticalit y1 New York:Springer-Verlag,1996.
[10] Waldrop M M.复杂:诞生于秩序与混沌边缘的科学.陈玲译.北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,19971
[11] Allen P M1 Self-organization in t he urban system1 In:Schieve WC,Allen PM1 Self-Organization and Dissipative Structures:Applications in t he Physical and Social Sciences1 Austin:University of Texas Press,19821 142~146.
[12] Wilson A G. Comlex Spatial Systems:The Modelling Foundations of Urban and Regional Analysis1 Singapore:PearsonEducation Asia Pte Ltd.,2000.
[13] 周一星.城市地理学.北京:商务印书馆,1995.417.
[14] 单纬东,陈彦光.信阳地区城乡聚落体系的分形几何特征.地域研究与开发,1998,17(3):48~51.
[15] 宁越敏.论宋代在中国城市发展史上的地位.见:华东师范大学西欧北美地理研究所及城市和区域开发研究中心编.区域经济和城市发展研究.浙江教育出版社,1993.78~90.
[16] 李润田主编.河南省经济地理.北京:新华出版社,1987.37~39.
[17] 陆大道.关于地理学的“人地系统”理论研究.地理研究,2002,21(2):135~146.
[18] 刘继生,陈彦光.城镇体系空间结构的分形维数及其测算方法.地理研究,1999,18(2):171~178.
[19] Frankhouser P.Aspects fractals des structures urbains1 L’Espace Geographique,1990,19(1):45~69.
[20] 刘继生,陈彦光.交通网络空间结构的分形维数及其测算方法.地理学报,1999,54(5):471~478
[21] 刘继生,陈彦光.人地非线性相关作用的探讨.地理科学,1997,17(3):224~230.
[22] 黄仁宇.中国大历史.北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,1997.13~15.
[23] White R,Engelen G,Uljee I1 The use of constrained cellular automata for high2resolution modeling of urban-land dynamics1 Environment and Planning B:Planning and Design,1997,24:323~343.
[24] 刘继生,陈彦光.基于GIS的细胞自动机模型与人地关系的复杂性研究———关于人地关系研究的技术模式探讨.地理研究,2002,21(2):155~162.

Outlines

/