Earth Surface Processes

China’s regional sustainable development status quo and its classification

Expand
  • 1. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China;
    2. Graduate School, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100039, China

Received date: 2002-12-08

  Revised date: 2003-03-28

  Online published: 2011-02-25

Abstract

The essential of sustainable development is the harmonization between population, resources and environment in order to gain the aim of social and economic sustainable development The region, especially at the provincial level, plays a very important role in the implementation of sustainable development strategy China's various provinces (regions) differ greatly both in terms of their natural resources endowment and in terms of their social and economic development To evaluate the sustainable status quo of each province and region properly is of great help to understand China's progress in sustainable development With the reference to various sustainable evaluation systems, a new synthesized sustainable evaluation system, which tries to assess the sustainable development status quo from the facet of economic development, social development, resources endowment & environmental status quo and sustainability is constructed in this article In the process of assigning weight to each factor, an Improved Analysis of Hierarchical Process (IAHP) is adopted, which can both reduce the objectivity of evaluation and simplify the calculation process According to this synthesized sustainable evaluation system, the sustainable status quo of China's 31 provinces (municipalities,autonomous regions) are assessed respectively Then, according to their evaluation score in sustainable development, these provinces (municipalities,autonomous regions) are divided into 6 different types: very high level type, including Shanghai, Beijing, Tianjin, Guangdong; high level type, including Zhejiang, Fujian, Heilongjiang, Liaoning, Jiangsu, Jilin and Shandong; upper middle level type, including Yunnan, Chongqing, Inner Mongolia, Hubei, Guangxi, Shanxi, Xinjiang, Hunan and Hainan; lower middle level type, including Sichuan, Qinghai, Hebei, Ningxia and Gansu; low level type, including Anhui, Henan, Shaanxi and Jiangxi; and very low level type, including Tibet and Guizhou The status quo of China's sustainable development unfold the degression trend of coastal area→along the border→middle part→middle→western part

Cite this article

JIA Ruo xiang, LIU Yi . China’s regional sustainable development status quo and its classification[J]. GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH, 2003 , 22(5) : 609 -617 . DOI: 10.11821/yj2003050009

References


[1] Walter Santagata. Cultural districts,property rights and sustainable economic growt h.I nternational Journal of U rbanand Regional Research,2002,26(1):9~24.
[2] Joseph Murphy,Andrew Gouldson1 Environmental policy and industrial innovation:integrating environment and economy t hrough ecological modernization.Geof orum,2000,31:33~44.
[3] David Counsell,Garret h Bruff1 Treat ment of t he environment in regional planning:a stronger line for sustainable development?Regional S t udies,2001,35(5):486~493.
[4] 王伟中,郭日生,黄晶.地方可持续发展导论.北京:商务印书馆,1999.26~27,387~388.
[5] 中国科学院可持续发展研究组.2000年中国可持续发展战略报告.北京:科学出版社,2001.24~26.
[6] 陆大道,刘毅,樊杰,等.1999中国区域发展报告.北京:商务印书馆,2000.230~254.
[7] 李利锋,郑度.区域可持续发展评价:进展与展望.地理科学进展,2002,21(3):237~245.
[8] The World Bank1 Expanding t he Measure of Wealt h:Indicators of Environmentally Sustainable Development.NewYork:The World Bank,1997123~341
[9] Dale Jaamieson1 Sustainabilit y and beyond1 Ecological Economics,1998,24:183~192.
[10] Trzyna T C(eds1).A Sustainable World:Defining and Measuring Sustainable Development.London:Eart hscan,1995117.
[11] 毛汉英.山东省可持续发展指标体系初步探讨.地理研究,1996,15(4):16~23.
[12] 周海林.国内外可持续发展指标(体系)研究综述.见:中国21世纪议程管理中心,哈尔滨市人民政府. 2000可持续发展指标国际研讨会文集.哈尔滨:黑龙江人民出版社,2000.68~82.
[13] 郑度.21世纪人地关系研究前瞻.地理研究,2002,21(1):9~13.
[14] Liverman D M,Hanson M,Brown B J,et al1 Global sustainabilit y:toward measurement.Envi ron mental M anagement,1998,12(2):133~143.
[15] 曾磊,雷军,鲁奇.我国城乡关联度评价指标体系构建及区域比较分析.地理研究,2002,21(6):763~772.
[16] 中国能源战略研究课题组.中国能源战略研究(2000-2050年)(分报告).北京:中国电力出版社,1997.1084.
[17] 李新运,孙瑛,常勇,等.山东省区域可持续发展评估及协调对策.人文地理,1998,13(4):65~69.

Outlines

/