Economic analysis on regional economic difference
Received date: 2001-01-08
Revised date: 2001-03-20
Online published: 2001-06-15
In this paper, we try to apply the economic model of economic growth and trade expansion (in the case of large country) to the economic analysis of regional economic difference in order to research the expansion course of regional economic difference At first, we introduce the economic model of economic growth and trade expansion (in the case of large country) briefly Secondly, we apply the economic model of economic growth and trade expansion (in the case of large country) to the regional economic analysis to set up the regional model of economic growth and trade expansion and use this model to research regional economic difference We find that the welfare of some regions begin to decrease correlatively due to economic growth and trade expansion in the regional labor division Thus we draw a conclusion that it is the term of trade that leads the regional economic difference to expand Thirdly, we inspect the conclusion with the figures of east and west of China Moreover we inspect the causal relationship between the term of trade and the regional economic difference through hypothesis testing of Granger causality and find out that there exists some causal relationship between the term of trade and the regional difference At last, we draw some conclusions as follows: (1) In the regional labor division, some regions are inevitably in a unfavorable state With economic growth and trade expansion, their terms of trade degenerate and welfare begin to decrease correlatively which led to expansion of regional economic difference (2) By inspection of the west and east of China, we find that there is causal relationship between the term of trade and regional economic difference (3) With the study of regional economic difference, we draw a conclusion that demand change is the main cause of degeneration of the term of trade Because the demand is in the base of industrial structure, so our study supports the conclusion that changes of industrial structure are the main impetus of regional economic growth
Key words: regional development; difference; economic analysis
HUA Jun, GU Chao lin . Economic analysis on regional economic difference[J]. GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH, 2001 , 20(3) : 322 -329 . DOI: 10.11821/yj2001030009
[1] 杨伟民.地区间收入差距变动的实证分析
[J].经济研究,1992,(1):70~74.
[2] 魏后凯.论我国区际收入差异的变动格局
[J].经济研究,1992,(4):61~65.
[3] 杨开忠.中国区域经济差异变动研究
[J].经济研究,1994,(12):28~33.
[4] 陈国阶.我国东中西部发展差异原因分析
[J].地理科学,1997,17(1):1~7.
[5] 中兼和津次.中国地区差异的结构及其机制
[J].管理世界,1994,(5):171~176.
[6] 覃成林.中国区域经济差异研究
[M].北京:中国经济出版社,1997154~108.
[7] 多米尼克.萨尔瓦多.国际经济学
[M].(张二震、仇向洋译).南京:江苏人民出版社,1992.126~151.
[8] 陈汉文.竞争中的合作
[M].成都:四川人民出版社,1987.101~121.
[9] Granger C. Investigating Causal Relations by Economic Models and Cross Spectral Met hods
[J]. Econometrics,1969,37:424~438.
[10] 李长风.经济计量学
[M].上海:上海财经大学出版社,1996. 168~191.
[11] 伍超标.计量经济学
[M].北京:中国统计出版社,1998.210~213.
[12] 翁君奕,徐华.非均衡增长与协调发展
[M].北京:中国发展出版社,1996.11~13.
[13] 赵建安.中国南北区域经济发展的互补性研究
[J].地理研究,1998,17(4):375~382.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |