The development of Western economic geography and its implications for geographers on both sides of the Taiwan Strait
Received date: 2004-04-13
Revised date: 2004-07-23
Online published: 2004-10-15
Since the 1950s, Western economic geography has undergone major paradigmatic transformations, influenced in part by institutional and technical changes in global economic production. Mainstream economic geography has witnessed major epistemological shifts away from earlier "mere description" to logical positivism, and from meta-theorization aiming at scientific prediction to place- and region-centered analysis for hermeneutic understanding. A new economic geography has appeared characterized by institutionalism, "cultural turn" and pluralism. Geographers on both sides of the Taiwan Strait have not had significant interactions with mainstream economic geography. Not only should we be familiar with the theories of mainstream economic geography, we should also critique them and modify them using the findings of our fieldwork conducted on the Chinese mainland and in Taiwan. We should establish our own intellectual identity and internationalize our scholarship.
Laurence MA . The development of Western economic geography and its implications for geographers on both sides of the Taiwan Strait[J]. GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH, 2004 , 23(5) : 573 -581 . DOI: 10.11821/yj2004050001
[1] Liu Weidong,L u Dadao.Ret hinking t he development of economic geography in Mainland China.Environment andPlanning A,2002,(12):2107～2126.
[2] Wu Chuanjun.Historical development and recent trends of economic geographical studies in China.In:C J Wu,et al.,eds.Geography in China.Beijing:Science Press,1984.117～132.
[3] Ma L J C,Noble A G.Recent developments in Chinese geographical research.Geographical Review,1979,(1):63～78.
[4] Hartshorne R.The Nature of Geography.Lancaster,PA:Association of American Geographers.1939.
[5] James P E,Jones C F,eds.American Geography:Inventory and Prospect.Syracuse,N Y:Syracuse University Press.1954.
[6] Johnston R J.Geography and Geographers:Anglo2American Human Geography since 1945.London:Arnold,1997.
[7] Scott A J.Economic geography:t he great half2century.In:Clark G L,Feldman M P,Gertler M S,eds.The OxfordHandbook of Economic Geography.Oxford:Oxford Universit y Press,2000.18～44.
[8] Barnes T J.Ret heorizing economic geography:from t he quantitative revolution to t he‘cultural turn’.Annals,Associa2tion of American Geographers,2001,(3):546～65.
[9] 马润潮.人文主义与后现代化主义之兴起及西方新区域地理学之发展.地理学报,1999,54(4):365～72.
[10] Golledge R G,Stimson R J.Spatial Behavior:A Geographic Perspective.New York:Guilford Press.1997.
[11] McDowell L,Sharpe J.Space,Gender,Knowledge:Feminist Readings.London:Arnold,1997.
[12] Rose G.Feminism and Geography.Minneapolis:University of Minnesota Press,1993.
[13] Peet R.Modern Geographical Thought.Oxford:Blackwell Publishers,1998.
[14] Peet R,Thrift N,eds.New Models in Geography:The Political2economic Perspective.2 vols.London:Unwin Hy2man,1989.
[15] Dear M.The post modern challenge:reconstructing human geography.Transactions,Institute of British Geographers,1988,13:262～274.
[16] Martin R.Editorial:The‘new economic geography’:challenge or irrelevance?Transactions,Institute of British Geog2raphers,1999,(24):387～391.
[17] 李小建.经济地理学近期研究的一个新方向分析.经济地理,2002,22(2):129～133.
[18] 李小建,李庆春.克鲁格曼的主要经济地理学观点分析.地理科学进展,1999,18(2):97～102.
[19] Martin R.The new‘geographical turn’in economics:some critical reflections.Cambridge Journal of Economics,1999,(23):65～91.
[20] Sheppard E.How‘economists’t hink:about geography,for example.Journal of Economic Geography,2001,(1):131～136.
[21] Amin A.Moving on:institutionalism in economic geography.Environment and Planning A,2001,33:1237～1241.
[22] Martin R.Institutional approaches in economic geography.In:Sheppard E,Barnes T J,eds.A Companion to Econom2ic Geography.Oxford:Blackwell Publishers,2000.77～94.
[23] 苗长虹,樊杰,张文忠.西方经济地理学区域研究的新视角———“新区域主义的兴起”.经济地理,2002,22(6):644～650.
[24] 庞效民.90年代西方经济地理学的文化研究趋向评述.经济地理,2000,20(5):5～8.
[25] Nort h D C.Institutions,Institutional Change and Economic Performance.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1990.
[26] Amin A,Thrift N.Globalization,institutional t hickness’and t he local economy.In:Healey P S,et al.eds.ManagingCities:The New Urban Contest.Chichester:Wiley,1995.91～108.
[27] Markusen A.Sticky places in slippery space:a typology of industricts.Economic Geography,1996,72:293～313.
[28] Granovetter M.Economic action and social structure:t he problem of embeddedness.American Journal of Sociology,1985,91:481～510.
[29] Mac Kinnon D,Cumbers A,Chapman K.Learning,innovation and regional development:a critical appraisal of recentdebates.Progress in Human Geography,2002,26:293～311.
[30] 王缉慈等.创新的空间———企业集群与区域发展.北京:北京大学出版社,2001.
[31] 朱华晟.浙江产业群———产业网络、成长轨迹与发展动力.杭州:浙江大学出版社,2003.
[32] 李小建.公司地理论.北京:科学出版社,1999.
[33] Yeung H W C.Redressing t he geographical bias in social science knowledge.Environment and Planning A,2001,33:2～9.
[34] Yeung H W C,Lin G C S.Theorizing economic geographies of Asia.Economic Geography,2003,79(2):107～128.
[35] Mc Gee T G.Eurocentrism in geography:t he case of Asian urbanization.Canadian Geographer,1991,35:322～344.
[36] Swyngedouw E.Neit her global nor local:glocalization’and t he politics of scale.In:Cox K R,ed.Spaces of Globaliza2tion:Reasserting t he Power of t he Local.New York:Guilford Press,1997.137～166.
[37] Ma L J C.Urban transformation in China,1949～2000:a review and research agenda.Environment and Planning A,2002,34:1545～1569.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |