The comparison of the CH 4 flux diurnal variation characteristics and diurnal uptake flux in different phenologies in Leymus Chinense grassland in Inner Mongolia,China
Received date: 2004-06-28
Revised date: 2004-09-20
Online published: 2004-12-15
Using the static chamber method, the diurnal variation of CH 4 fluxes of the undisturbed community and soil were studied through the experiment in situ at different phenologies of Leymus Chinense grassland in Xilin river basin of Inner Mongolia. According to the results of field experiment, we analyzed the characteristics of diurnal variation of undisturbed community and soil CH 4 flux and the statistic relationship between CH 4 fluxes and environmental factors (e.g. air temperature, surface soil temperature, soil moisture) together with the ecological factors(e.g. aboveground biomass, underground biomass, litter biomass)by correlation analysis and multiple stepwise regression method. The main research results were as follows: The fluxes of undisturbed community and soil CH 4 were all negative and the Leymus Chinense grassland was the sink of air CH 4. There was great difference among diurnal variation patterns of CH 4 flux in different phenologies and the effect of temperature condition on diurnal variation of CH 4 flux wasn't remarkable except the post-fruiting vegetative stage. The difference between undisturbed community CH 4 fluxes and corresponding soil CH 4 fluxes wasn't significant except in post-fruit vegetative stage of 2002 and in flowering stage. And for the difference of undisturbed community CH 4 flux among different phenologies, the difference between flowering stage and post grain-filling stage, flowering stage and post-fruiting vegetative stage of 2001, post grain-filling stage and post-fruiting vegetative stage of 2002 reached the significance of 0.01 or 0.05, but the differences of undisturbed community CH 4 flux between any other two phenologies and the differences of soil CH 4 flux between any two phenologies were all not significant. The results of multiple regression analysis indicated that the changes of underground biomass at 0-20cm depth could account for 95.0% of the variance of the community CH 4 flux and 99.0% of the change of soil CH 4 flux of different phenologies. The change of the ratio of soil CH 4 diurnal uptake flux and the total community diurnal uptake flux was affected markedly by the change of litterfall biomass.
QI Yu-chun, DONG Yun-she, GENG Yuan-bo, YANG Xiao-hong, LIU Li-xin, LI Ming-feng, LIU Xing-ren . The comparison of the CH 4 flux diurnal variation characteristics and diurnal uptake flux in different phenologies in Leymus Chinense grassland in Inner Mongolia,China[J]. GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH, 2004 , 23(6) : 795 -804 . DOI: 10.11821/yj2004060009
[1] 陶波,葛全胜,李克让,等.陆地生态系统碳循环研究进展.地理研究,2001,20(5):564~575.
[2] 刘纪远,于贵瑞,王绍强,等.陆地生态系统碳循环及其机理研究的地球信息科学方法初探.地理研究,2003,22(4):397~405.
[3] 周涛,仪垂祥,史培军,等.陆地表层碳循环与温度反馈机制研究.地理研究,2002,21(1):45~53.
[4] IPCC.Climate change 2001:The Scientific Basis.Cont ribut ion of Work Group I to the Third A ssessent Report of the Int ergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.Cambridge University Press,2001.
[5] Chan A S,Parkin T B.Evaluation of potent ial inhibit ors of met hanogenesis and met hane oxidat ion in a landfill cover soil.SoilBiol.Biochem,2000,32(11/12):1581~1590.
[6] Topp E,Pattey E.Soil as sources and sinks for atmospheric methane.Canadian Journal of Soil Science,1997,77:167~178.
[7] Whalen S C.Rapid methane oxidation in a landf ill cover soil.Appl.Environ.Microbio.,1990,56:3405~3411.
[8] Mosier A R,Schime D,Valentine D,et al.Methane and nitrous oxide fluxes in nat ive,fertilized and cultivated grassland.Nature,1991,(350):330~332.
[9] Duenas C,Fernandez M C,Carretero J,et al.M ethane uptake in soils of southern Spain estimat ed by two different techniques:static chamber and 222 radon flux and soil air concentration profiles.Atmospheric Environment,1996,30(4):545~552.
[10] 裴浩,李云鹏,敖艳红.草地枯草被与土壤含水量.中国草地,1996,(1):36~38.
[11] 郭继勋,孙刚,姜世成.松嫩平原羊草草原凋落物层群落学作用的研究.植物生态学报,2000,24(4):473~476.
[12] 郭继勋.枯枝落叶对草原生态环境的影响.中国草地,1989,(6):17~20.
[13] 董云社,彭公炳,李俊.温带森林土壤CO2、CH4、N2O时空特征.地理学报,1996,51(增刊):120~128.
[14] 陈佐忠.锡林河流域地形与气候概况.见:中国科学院内蒙古草原生态系统定位站编.草地生态系统研究第三集.北京:科学出版社,1988.13~22.
[15] 李博,雍世鹏,李忠厚.锡林河流域植被及其利用.见:中国科学院内蒙古草原生态系统定位站编.草地生态系统研究第三集.北京:科学出版社,1988.84~184.
[16] 齐玉春,罗辑,董云社,等.贡嘎山山地暗针叶林带森林土壤温室气体N2O、CH4排放研究.中国科学(D辑),2002,32(11):934~941.
[17] 徐星凯,周礼恺.土壤源CH4氧化的主要因子与减排措施.生态农业研究,1999,7(2):18~22.
[18] 王跃思,薛敏,黄耀,等.内蒙古天然与放牧草原温室气体排放研究.应用生态学报,2003,14(3):372~376.
[19] Striegl R G.Diffusional l imit s to the consumption of atmospheric methane by soils.Chemosphere,1993,26:715~720.
[20] Adamsen A P S,King G M.M ethane consumption in t emperate and subarctic forest soils:rat es,vert icle zonation and response t owater and nitrogen.A ppl.Environ.M icrobiol,1993,59:485~490.
[21] Mosier A R,Schime D,Valent ine D,et al.Methane and nitrous oxide fluxes in native,fert ilized and cult ivated grasslands.Nature,1991,(350):330~332.
[22] Dorr H,Katruf f L,Levin I.Soil t exture parameterization of the methane uptake in aerated soils.Chemosphere,1993,26(1-4):697~713.
[23] Crill P M,Martikainen P J,Nykanen H,et al.Temperature and N f ertilization ef fects on met hane oxidation in a drained peat landsoil.Soil Biology and Biochemist ry,1994,26(10):1331~1339.
[24] Klemedtsson A K,Klemedt sson L.Methane uptake in Swedish forest soil in relation to limiting and extra N deposition.Biol.Fert.Soils,1997,25:296~301.
[25] Steinkamp R,Butt erbach bahl K,Papen H.Methane oxidation by soil of an N limit ed and N fertilized Spruce forest in the BlackForest,Germany.Soil Biol.Biochem.,2001,33:145~153.
[26] Castro M S,St eudler P A,M elillo J M,et al.Factors controlling atmospheric methane consumpt ion by temperate forest soils.Global Biogeochemical Cycles,1995,9:1~10.
[27] 丁维新,蔡祖聪.植物在CH产生、氧化和排放中的作用.应用生态学报,2003,14(8):1379~1384.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |