Cultural relic-scape sensitivity evaluation and its sustainable use:a case study of Taxkorgan Stone Town in Xinjiang
Received date: 2005-11-15
Revised date: 2006-03-21
Online published: 2006-06-15
Cultural relic-scape is an important type of cultural landscape heritage and also an important type of landscape resource.But cultural landscapes were conserved totally in a simply way in the past and were not open to visitors.With the development of tourism,cultural relic-scape is becoming an important cultural tourism resources and attracting more and more visitors all over the world.Because of being neglected for a long time some cultural relic-scapes have been naturally damaged or disturbed by tourism,so it is necessary and meaningful to do more researches on relic-scape effective conservation and sustainable development.Cultural relic-scape sensitivity is the key factor influencing relic-scape conservation and sustainable developing models.The sensitivity evaluation is the basic research to sustainable development of cultural relic-scapes.The characteristics of landscape sensitivity are determined by landscape ecological sensitivity(LE),visional sensitivity(LV) and landscape architecture sensitivity(LA).Based on the evaluation of LA,LV and LA,the indexes of landscape sensitivity are calculated through the formula LS=3LE·LV·LA and divided into five levels which are dissensitive(1.0-2.0),low sensitivity(2.1-4.0),mid-sensitivity(4.1-6.0),higher sensitivity(6.1-8.0) and highest sensitivity(8.0-9.0).This paper,taking the Taxkorgan Stone Town in Xinjiang as case study and the sensitivity evaluation as start-point,based on landscape ecological sensitivity evaluation,landscape visional sensitivity evaluation and landscape architecture and its surroundings sensitivity evaluation,evaluate landscape sensitivity systematically.The main conclusions are:(1)The snow mountains are the main distant environment landscape and the river valley is the visional corridor to this region and with remarkable and sensitive characteristics.(2) The stone town relic-scape and the sandbanks are highly ecological sensitive,the relicscape and waterscape are highly visional sensitive and the relic town is made up by stones,mud and grasses and farmer's houses are most sensitive to landscape.According to the conclusions of sensitivity evaluations,the countermeasures of relic-scape sustainable development are discussed,which are effective conservation and sustainable development,dividing into key region,buildings controlling region,landscape coordinating region and original landscape conservation area,rational landscape capacity and tourist behavior standards,ways for entering and controlling of infrastructures and the ways of re-imaging historical culture landscape and sustainable development.
WANG Yun-cai, CHEN Tian, SHI Yi-shao . Cultural relic-scape sensitivity evaluation and its sustainable use:a case study of Taxkorgan Stone Town in Xinjiang[J]. GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH, 2006 , 25(3) : 517 -525 . DOI: 10.11821/yj2006030017
[1] U N ESCO关于保护景观和遗址的风貌与特性的建议1962
[2] U N ESCO关于国家一级保护文化和自然遗产的建议1972
[3] U N ESCO关于世界文化和自然遗产公约1972
[4] U N ESCO保护无形文化遗产公约2003
[5] Brian St one A ss ess ing t h e visual qualit y of ru ral landscape Landscape and U rban Planning,2004,69:121~128
[6] J ohn Fras er Th e Rural Landscape Balt imore:T he J ohns H op kins U niversit y Pr ess,1998 77~93
[7] T obias Pu rtauf Carabid comm unit ies in t he spat ial t emporal mosaic of a rural lands cape Landscape and U rbanPlanning,2004,67:195~193
[8] H annes Palang Rural landscape:past process and f ut ure strategies Landscape and U rban Planning,2005,70:3~8
[9] Paul Claval R eadi ng t he rural l ands cape Land scape an d U rban Planning,2005,70:9~19
[10] 卢松,等古村落旅游地旅游环境容量初探地理研究,2005,24(4):581~590
[11] 陆林徽州古村落的演化过程及其机理地理研究,2004,23(5):686~694
[12] 吴必虎中国的世界遗产地保护与旅游需求关系地理研究,2002,21(1):617~626
[13] 陶伟世界遗产中的古城研究方法与内容初探地理研究,2002,21(2):210~218
[14] 罗德启中国贵州民族村镇保护与利用建筑学报,2004,(6):7~10
[15] 王红贵州西江苗岭!景观评价、规划与利用建筑学报,2004,(12):60~62
[16] 李艳英福建南靖县石桥古村落保护和发展策略研究建筑学报,2004,(12):54~56
[17] 波贝再老挝古都琅勃拉帮城德遗产保护与发展城市规划,2004,(8):69~7.
[18] 曹丽娟从世界遗产到国家遗产、地方遗产体系城市规划,2004,(8):65~68
[19] 张耀辉三星堆遗址保护的实践与思考中华文化论坛,2005(1):9~1.
[20] 王云才论大都市郊区游憩景观规划与景观生态保护以北京市郊区游憩景观规划为例地理研究,2003,22(2):324~334
[21] 王云才流域游憩景观生态适宜性评价及其可持续利用地理学报,2005,60(4):645~655
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |