Studies on urban villages' renewal and governance have attracted much interest in human geographical research field since the 1990s. However, there is little literature focusing on the developing evolution, pattern and dynamic mechanism of urban villages based on the theoretical system of urban spatial structure, and there are very few scholars doing comparison studies between urban village and general urban spatial form. In this paper, Shenzhen, the most representative city on urban villages' development in China, is taken as a case to explore the characteristics and modes of urban villages' development. With census data of urban villages' construction in 1999 and 2004, spatial and temporal characteristics of 91 original administrative urban villages in Shenzhen Special Economic Zone (Shenzhen SEZ) on land area construction floor area and construction intensity have been analyzed and compared with developing mode of general urban space. It is indicated that urban villages match with general urban developing rules in three aspects. (1) Land sprawl is the most remarkable mode in initial development of urban villages. (2) In urban villages' rapidly developing era thereis, "distance-attenuation" tendency in construction intensity obviously accompanying with some anomalous fluctuation at several urban sections. (3) Renewal and redevelopment methods are carried out gradually since urban villages come in their maturely developing period. However, because of historical and institutional restriction, urban villages perform uniquely in original spatial distribution, spatial expanding mode in developing era, developing rate of spatial form evolution, etc. The results not only contribute to theoretical extension on the mode of general urban spatial structure and further exploring on theoretical values of studies on urban villages, but also imply that governments should establish rational and objective rules to govern urban villages and advance their smart growth according to urban economic development and different housing demands concerning different income levels. Urban villages should be neither redeveloped in full accordance with the ways that general urban spatial form faces, nor ignored with their developing demands and trends as a type of urban spatial form.
TONG De, FENG Chang-chun, DENG Jin-jie
. Spatial evolution and cause analysis of urban villages: A case study of Shenzhen Special Economic Zone[J]. GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH, 2011
, 30(3)
: 437
-446
.
DOI: 10.11821/yj2011030005
[1] 房庆方,马向明,宋劲松. 城中村:从广东看我国城市化进程中遇到的政策问题. 城市规划, 1999, 23(9): 18~20.
[2] 敬东. "城市里的乡村"研究报告——经济发达地区城市中心区农村城市化进程的对策. 城市规划, 1999, 23(9): 8~14.
[3] 魏立华, 闫小培. 中国经济发达地区城市非正式移民聚居区——"城中村"的形成与演进. 管理世界, 2005,(8): 48~57.
[4] Lin G C S. Peri-urbanism in globalizing China: A study of new urbanism in Dongguan. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 2006, 47(1): 28~53.
[5] Wang Y P, Wang Y l, Wu J S. Urbanization and informal development in China: Urban villages in Shenzhen. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 2009, 33(4): 957~973.
[6] Chan R C K, Yao Y M, Zhao X B. Self-help housing strategy for temporary population in Guangzhou, China. Habitat International, 2003, (27): 19~35.
[7] Leaf M. A tale of two villages: Globalization and peri-urban change in China and Vietnam. Cities, 2002, 19(1): 23~31.
[8] Leaf M. Chengzhongcun: China's urbanizing villages from multiple perspectives.In: Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Urban Development and Land Policy in China. 2006. 145~159.
[9] Liu X L, Liang W. Zhejiangcun: social and spatial implications of informal urbanization on the periphery of Beijing. Cities, 1997, 14(2): 95~108.
[10] Zhu J M. Urban development under ambiguous property rights: A case of China's transition economy. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 2002, 26(1): 41~57.
[11] Zhang L, Zhao S X B, Tian J P. Self-help in housing and Chengzhongcun in China's urbanization. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 2003, 27(4): 912~937.
[12] 顾朝林, 熊江波. 简论城市边缘区研究. 地理研究, 1989, 8(9): 95~99.
[13] 许学强, 胡华颖, 叶嘉安. 广州市社会空间结构的因子生态分析. 地理学报, 1989, 44(4): 385~396.
[14] 张建明, 许学强. 城乡边缘带研究的回顾与展望. 人文地理, 1997, 12(3): 5~8.
[15] 李培林. 巨变:村落的终结——都市里的村庄研究. 社会学月刊, 2002, (4): 168~179.
[16] 薛德升, 黄耿志. 管制之外的"管制":城中村非正规部门的空间集聚与生存状态——以广州市下渡村为例. 地理研究, 2008, 27(6): 1390~1399.
[17] 尹晓颖, 薛德升, 闫小培. "城中村"非正规部门形成发展机制——以深圳市蔡屋围为例. 经济地理, 2006, 26(6): 969~973.
[18] 黄怡. 城市社会分层与居住隔离. 上海: 同济大学出版社, 2006. 172~193.
[19] 吴明伟,吴晓. 我国城市化背景下的流动人口聚居形态研究——以江苏省为例. 南京: 东南大学出版社, 2005. 79~118.
[20] 张京祥, 赵伟. 二元规制环境中城中村发展及其意义的分析. 城市规划, 2007, 31(1): 63~67.
[21] 朱荣远,张立民,郭旭东. 表情复杂的中国城市化附生物——城中村:有关深圳市城中村调查研究的启示. 城市规划, 2006, 30(9): 84~88.
[22] 谢志岿. 村落向城市社区的转型——制度、政策与中国城市化进程中城中村问题研究. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社, 2005.
[23] 丁成日,宋彦,Gerrit Knaap,等. 城市规划与空间结构——城市可持续发展战略. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2005. 178.
[24] Brueckner J. A dynamic model of resource allocation in a metropolitan area. American Economic Review, 1981, (10): 1~14.
