Based on statistics of industrial pollutant yields and discharge quantity in Jilin Province, the non-residual decomposition model was applied to quantify the net amount of environmental benefits of clean production and end-pipe treatment respectively. Environmental performances of end-of-pipe and pollution prevention strategies were further analyzed to explore an appropriate way of improving regional industrial ecological transition. The results showed that industrial symbiosis did not exert a positive effect on environment improvement. Technical factor promoted environmental performance improvement in clean production, while both technical factor and scale factor did in end-pipe treatment. Clean production was superior to end-pipe treatment in pollution volume reduction, which implied that prevention strategy dominated over end-of-pipe strategy, but the improvement of clean production tended to slow down. It is necessary to construct a proper industrial ecological system for the realization of environmental goals.
GAO Ying-chun, TONG Lian-jun, MA Yan-ji, LI Ming-sheng
. Environmental performance analysis of clean production and end-pipe treatment[J]. GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH, 2011
, 30(3)
: 505
-512
.
DOI: 10.11821/yj2011030011
[1] Lundberg K, Balfors B, Folkeson L. Framework for environmental performance measurement in a Swedish public sector organization. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2009,17(11):1017~1024.
[2] Ramos T B, Alves I, Subtil R, et al.The state of environmental performance evaluation in the public sector: The case of the Portuguese defence sector. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2009, 17(1):36~52.
[3] Zhou P, Ang B W, Poh K L. Measuring environmental performance under different environmental DEA technologies. Energy Economics, 2008,30(1):1~14.
[4] Srebotnjak T. The role of environmental statisticians in environmental policy: The case of performance measurement.Environmental Science and Policy, 2007,10(5):405~418.
[5] Mayer A L. Strengths and weaknesses of common sustainability indices for multidimensional systems.Environment International, 2008,34 (2):277~291.
[6] Lundberg K, Balfors B, Folkeson L. Framework for environmental performance measurement in a Swedish public sector organization. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2009,17(11):1017~1024.
[7] 关伟.区域水资源与经济社会耦合系统可持续发展的量化分析.地理研究,2007,26(4):685~692.
[8] Wagner M. How to reconcile environmental and economic performance to improve corporate sustainability: Corporate environmental strategies in the European paper industry. Journal of Environmental Management, 2005, 76(2) :105~118.
[9] Basu A J, Zyl D J A. Industrial ecology framework for achieving cleaner production in the mining and minerals industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2006,14(3-4):299~304.
[10] Wagner M. How to reconcile environmental and economic performance to improve corporate sustainability: Corporate environmental strategies in the European paper industry. Journal of Environmental Management, 2005,76(2):105~118.
[11] Kassinis G, Vafeas N. Environmental performance and plant closure. Journal of Business Research, 2009,62(4): 484~494.
[12] 高迎春,佟连军.区域工业污染物增长份额偏离分析.环境科学,2010,31(4):1114~1120.
[13] Sun J W.Change in energy consumption and energy intensity: A complete decomposition mode. Energy Economics, 1998,20(1): 85~100.
[14] 李凯,李明玉,郁培丽,等.辽宁省能源消费的因素分解——基于完全分解模型.东北大学学报(自然科学版),2007,28(11):1656~1659.
[15] 李名升,佟连军,仇方道.工业废水排放变化的因素分解与减排效果.环境科学,2009,30(3):707~712.
[16] 孙才志,王妍.辽宁省产业用水变化驱动效应分解与时空分异.地理研究,2010,29(2):244~252.
[17] Jasch C. Environmental performance evaluation and indicators. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2000, 8 (1):79~88.
[18] Chandak S P."Desire", demonstration in small industries for reducing waste. Industrial Environment, 1994,17(4):41~45.
